Literature DB >> 21264658

Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging with gadofosveset trisodium as a negative contrast agent for lymph node metastases assessment.

Tomohiro Yamashita1, Taro Takahara, Thomas C Kwee, Shuichi Kawada, Tomohiko Horie, Chie Inomoto, Kazunobu Hashida, Hiroshi Yamamuro, Kazunori Myojin, Peter R Luijten, Yutaka Imai.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of using intravenously administered gadofosveset trisodium as a negative contrast agent for lymph node (LN) assessment with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using a VX2 tumor model in rabbits.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: VX2 cells were injected in the right hind limb of five Japanese white rabbits to induce ipsilateral popliteal LN metastasis. DWI was performed before and every 7.5 min (until 1 h) after intravenous gadofosveset trisodium administration, at 1.5 T. Signal intensities (SIs) of right (metastatic) and left (nonmetastatic) popliteal LNs at each time point were measured and compared to each other using two-sided unpaired t-tests.
RESULTS: The SIs of metastatic lymph nodes were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than those of nonmetastatic LNs at each time point after intravenous gadofosveset trisodium administration. Although the SI of metastatic LNs was significantly higher (P = 0.0237) than that of nonmetastatic LNs before contrast injection, this difference became even more significant (P ≤ 0.0105) after gadofosveset trisodium administration.
CONCLUSION: The SI of metastatic LNs at DWI is less suppressed than that of nonmetastatic LNs after the intravenous administration of gadofosveset trisodium. Therefore, intravenously administered gadofosveset trisodium shows promise for use as a negative contrast agent for discriminating metastatic from nonmetastatic LNs at DWI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21264658     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-010-0513-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Radiol        ISSN: 1867-1071            Impact factor:   2.374


  21 in total

Review 1.  Current concepts in lymph node imaging.

Authors:  Maha Torabi; Suzanne L Aquino; Mukesh G Harisinghani
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Value of diffusion-weighted imaging to detect small malignant pelvic lymph nodes at 3 T.

Authors:  Catherine Roy; Guillaume Bierry; Andrea Matau; Gauthier Bazille; Rémy Pasquali
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Vasovist-enhanced MR angiography.

Authors:  Mathias Goyen; Kohkan Shamsi; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Interstitial MR lymphography with MS-325: characterization of normal and tumor-invaded lymph nodes in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Christoph U Herborn; Thomas C Lauenstein; Florian M Vogt; Randall B Lauffer; Jörg F Debatin; Stephan G Ruehm
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Aine Sakurada; Taro Takahara; Thomas C Kwee; Tomohiro Yamashita; Seiji Nasu; Tomohiko Horie; Marc Van Cauteren; Yutaka Imai
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Diffusion weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): technical improvement using free breathing, STIR and high resolution 3D display.

Authors:  Taro Takahara; Yutaka Imai; Tomohiro Yamashita; Seiei Yasuda; Seiji Nasu; Marc Van Cauteren
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

7.  Microcirculation of the lymph node with metastases.

Authors:  P G Herman; C S Kim; M A de Sousa; H Z Mellins
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Cancer statistics, 2009.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Yongping Hao; Jiaquan Xu; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Assessment of metastatic cervical adenopathy using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Nancy J Fischbein; Susan M Noworolski; Roland G Henry; Michael J Kaplan; William P Dillon; Sarah J Nelson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for nodal staging.

Authors:  Vincent Vandecaveye; Frederik De Keyzer; Vincent Vander Poorten; Piet Dirix; Eric Verbeken; Sandra Nuyts; Robert Hermans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  2 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in primary rectal cancer staging demonstrates but does not characterise lymph nodes.

Authors:  Luc A Heijnen; Doenja M J Lambregts; Dipanjali Mondal; Milou H Martens; Robert G Riedl; Geerard L Beets; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: protocol optimization, interpretation, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Savannah C Partridge; Elizabeth S McDonald
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 2.266

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.