Literature DB >> 19251938

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for nodal staging.

Vincent Vandecaveye1, Frederik De Keyzer, Vincent Vander Poorten, Piet Dirix, Eric Verbeken, Sandra Nuyts, Robert Hermans.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, as compared with turbo spin-echo MR imaging, for the detection of nodal metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the ethics committee, and patients gave written informed consent. Before undergoing surgery, 33 consecutive patients underwent 1.5-T MR imaging, including DW imaging performed with a wide range of b values (0-1000 sec/mm(2)). The apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of lymph nodes 4 mm or greater in short-axis diameter depicted on images obtained with b values of 0 and 1000 sec/mm(2) were calculated. After topographic correlation, the lymph nodes were evaluated microscopically with prekeratin immunostaining. The optimal ADC thresholds for discriminating between metastatic and benign lymph nodes were determined. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of DW imaging were calculated separately-on per-lymph-node and per-neck-level bases-for all lymph nodes and for supracentimeter and subcentimeter lymph nodes and were compared with corresponding turbo spin-echo MR imaging values.
RESULTS: Correlation of histopathologic and radiologic findings was possible for 301 lymph nodes. The ADC derived from the signal intensity averaged across images obtained with b values of 0 and 1000 sec/mm(2) (ADC(b0-1000)) was 1.19 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.22 (standard deviation) for benign lymph nodes and 0.85 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.27 for malignant lymph nodes (P < .0001). With an optimal ADC(b0-1000) threshold of 0.94 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec, 84% sensitivity, 94% specificity, and 91% accuracy for differentiation of malignant versus benign status of each lymph node and 94% sensitivity, 97% specificity, and 97% accuracy for differentiation at each neck level were achieved. Compared with turbo spin-echo imaging, DW imaging had higher sensitivity (76% vs 7%) but slightly lower specificity (94.0% vs 99.5%) for detection of subcentimeter nodal metastases.
CONCLUSION: DW imaging performed with ADC(b0-1000) values had higher accuracy than turbo spin-echo MR imaging in nodal staging, providing added value in the detection of subcentimeter nodal metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19251938     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2511080128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  97 in total

Review 1.  Biologic imaging of head and neck cancer: the present and the future.

Authors:  A Srinivasan; S Mohan; S K Mukherji
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging in oncology.

Authors:  Concepción González Hernando; Laura Esteban; Teresa Cañas; Enrique Van den Brule; Miguel Pastrana
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  [Post-therapeutic imaging strategies and follow-up in head and neck malignant tumours].

Authors:  R Aschenbach; D Esser
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping for staging patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Chieh Lin; Alain Luciani; Emmanuel Itti; Taoufik El-Gnaoui; Alexandre Vignaud; Pauline Beaussart; Shih-jui Lin; Karim Belhadj; Pierre Brugières; Eva Evangelista; Corinne Haioun; Michel Meignan; Alain Rahmouni
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: diffusion-weighted MR imaging for prediction and monitoring of treatment response.

Authors:  Ann D King; Frankie K F Mo; Kwok-Hung Yu; David K W Yeung; Hua Zhou; Kunwar S Bhatia; Gary M K Tse; Alexander C Vlantis; Jeffrey K T Wong; Anil T Ahuja
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Differential diagnosis of axillary inflammatory and metastatic lymph nodes in rabbit models by using diffusion-weighted imaging: compared with conventional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Junping Wang; Qian Liao; Yunting Zhang; Chunshui Yu; Renju Bai; Haoran Sun
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Diagnostic performance of ADCs in different ROIs for breast lesions.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Guan-Qiao Jin; Jun-Jie Liu; Dan-Ke Su; Ning-Bin Luo; Dong Xie; Shao-Lv Lai; Xiang-Yang Huang; Wei-Li Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

8.  Differentiation between benign and malignant orbital tumors at 3-T diffusion MR-imaging.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek; Sahar Elkhamary; Amani Mousa
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 9.  Clinical applications for diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Christina Tsien; Yue Cao; Thomas Chenevert
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.934

10.  Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and tractography of the brachial plexus: feasibility and initial experience in neoplastic conditions.

Authors:  Maria Isabel Vargas; Magalie Viallon; Duy Nguyen; Jacqueline Delavelle; Minerva Becker
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.