Literature DB >> 21264628

Disruption of visual feature binding in working memory.

Taiji Ueno1, Richard J Allen, Alan D Baddeley, Graham J Hitch, Satoru Saito.   

Abstract

In a series of five experiments, we studied the effect of a visual suffix on the retention in short-term visual memory of both individual visual features and objects involving the binding of two features. Experiments 1A, 1B, and 2 involved suffixes consisting of features external to the to-be-remembered set and revealed a modest but equivalent disruption on individual and bound feature conditions. Experiments 3A and 3B involved suffixes comprising features that could potentially have formed part of the to-be-remembered set (but did not on that trial). Both experiments showed greater disruption of retention for objects comprising bound features than for their individual features. The results are interpreted as differentiating two components of suffix interference, one affecting memory for features and bindings equally, the other affecting memory for bindings. The general component is tentatively identified with the attentional cost of operating a filter to prevent the suffix from entering visual working memory, whereas the specific component is attributed to the particular fragility of bound representations when the filter fails.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21264628     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-010-0013-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  18 in total

1.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  E K Vogel; G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Temporal integration between visual images and visual percepts.

Authors:  James R Brockmole; Ranxiao Frances Wang; David E Irwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Is visual short-term memory object based? Rejection of the "strong-object" hypothesis.

Authors:  Ingrid R Olson; Yuhong Jiang
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-10

4.  Exploring the suffix effect in serial visuospatial short-term memory.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; Sébastien Tremblay; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

5.  Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes.

Authors:  Tal Makovski; Rachel Sussman; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  The role of attention in visual and auditory suffix effects.

Authors:  G J Hitch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1975-09

7.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Feature binding, attention and object perception.

Authors:  A Treisman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.

Authors:  S J Luck; E K Vogel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding?

Authors:  Richard J Allen; Alan D Baddeley; Graham J Hitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2006-05
View more
  13 in total

1.  The role of attention in remembering important item-location associations.

Authors:  Alexander L M Siegel; Alan D Castel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-11

2.  Asymmetric binding in serial memory for verbal and spatial information.

Authors:  Katherine Guérard; Candice C Morey; Sébastien Lagacé; Sébastien Tremblay
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-04

3.  What does visual suffix interference tell us about spatial location in working memory?

Authors:  Richard J Allen; Judit Castellà; Taiji Ueno; Graham J Hitch; Alan D Baddeley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-01

4.  Retrieval from long-term memory reduces working memory representations for visual features and their bindings.

Authors:  Amanda E van Lamsweerde; Melissa R Beck; Emily M Elliott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-02

5.  Feature binding and the processing of global-local shapes in bilingual and monolingual children.

Authors:  Milvia Cottini; Laura Pieroni; Pietro Spataro; Antonella Devescovi; Emiddia Longobardi; Clelia Rossi-Arnaud
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-04

6.  From short-term store to multicomponent working memory: The role of the modal model.

Authors:  Alan D Baddeley; Graham J Hitch; Richard J Allen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05

7.  Contingency blindness: location-identity binding mismatches obscure awareness of spatial contingencies and produce profound interference in visual working memory.

Authors:  Chris M Fiacconi; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-08

8.  Intraobject and extraobject memory binding across early development.

Authors:  Kevin P Darby; Per B Sederberg; Vladimir M Sloutsky
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2022-03-21

9.  Mask similarity impacts short-term consolidation in visual working memory.

Authors:  Lisa Durrance Blalock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

10.  Executive and perceptual distraction in visual working memory.

Authors:  Richard J Allen; Alan D Baddeley; Graham J Hitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.