Literature DB >> 21263352

Invasive cervical cancer and screening: what are the rates of unscreened and underscreened women in the modern era?

Akila Subramaniam1, Janelle M Fauci, Kellie E Schneider, Jenny M Whitworth, Britt K Erickson, Kenneth Kim, Warner K Huh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It has been reported that approximately 50% of invasive cervical malignancies are diagnosed in patients who have never been screened and that 10% of the remaining cervical cancer patients have not had a Pap smear in the 5 years before diagnosis. We sought to determine whether this holds true among a university-based gynecologic oncology patient population.
METHODS: After institutional review board approval, a retrospective chart review of women in a university-based gynecologic oncology group with cervical cancer from 2002 to 2007 was conducted. Patients' demographics, referral Pap smear, method of diagnosis, histology, clinical stage, treatment, and time since last Pap smear were collected. Descriptive statistics were used during data analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 419 women with cervical cancer were identified. Of these women, 67% of patients were white, 18% Hispanic, and 6% African-American. The most common referral Pap smear to our institution was high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (21%). Diagnosis was primarily made by cervical punch biopsy (47%). The most common histologic type was squamous cell carcinoma (70%). Of all patients, 80% were diagnosed with stage I and 9% with stage II cervical cancer, whereas stage III and IV were uncommon. The most common therapy was radical hysterectomy with lymph node dissection performed in 250 patients (60%). The length of time from last reported Pap smear to diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer ranged from 1 to 65 years, with a median of 3 years. Stage IA1 patients ranged from 1 to 12 years from last reported Pap with a median of 1 year (SD = 3.38), whereas stage III/IV patients ranged from 1 to 20 years since last screening, with a median of 4 years (SD = 6.39). Regarding length of time since last reported Pap smear, 235 patients (56%) were unable to report the length of time since their last Pap smear. Of those who reported their last Pap smear, 4 patients (1%) reported never having a Pap smear, 39 patients (9%) reported last Pap smear more than 10 years ago, and 10 patients (2%) reported a Pap smear more than 20 years ago. Of all patients, 85 (20%) reported a Pap smear within 2 years. Of these 85 patients, 71 patients (84%) were diagnosed at stage I, whereas more advanced stages were uncommon.
CONCLUSIONS: Traditionally, patients diagnosed with an invasive cervical malignancy are either unscreened or underscreened with cervical cytology. Our patient population was noncompliant with the screening measures. A fraction of our patients were compliant with screening within the last 2 years, yet still developed a cervical malignancy--albeit early stage disease. As such, our data suggest that compliance continues to be an issue. However, even with adherence to screening guidelines, cervical cancer continues to develop.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21263352      PMCID: PMC4465558          DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181f515a2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis        ISSN: 1089-2591            Impact factor:   1.925


  4 in total

Review 1.  Chapter 2: The burden of HPV-related cancers.

Authors:  D Maxwell Parkin; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Papanicolaou smear screening interval and risk of cervical cancer.

Authors:  K Shy; J Chu; M Mandelson; B Greer; D Figge
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Advancing age and cervical cancer screening and prognosis.

Authors:  G F Sawaya; H Y Sung; K A Kearney; M Miller; W Kinney; R A Hiatt; J Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.

Authors:  Bengt Andrae; Levent Kemetli; Pär Sparén; Lena Silfverdal; Björn Strander; Walter Ryd; Joakim Dillner; Sven Törnberg
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 13.506

  4 in total
  20 in total

1.  Opting out of cervical cancer screening: physicians who do not perform pap tests.

Authors:  Crystale Purvis Cooper; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Acceptability and usability of self-collected sampling for HPV testing among African-American women living in the Mississippi Delta.

Authors:  Isabel C Scarinci; Allison G Litton; Isabel C Garcés-Palacio; Edward E Partridge; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2013-02-12

3.  Prevalence of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus by RNA Assay in Home Self-Collected Samples Among Underscreened People in North Carolina.

Authors:  Fan Lee; Alexandra Bukowski; Lisa P Spees; Stephanie B Wheeler; Noel T Brewer; Busola Sanusi; Michael G Hudgens; Sarah Jackson; Lynn Barclay; Alicia Carter; Jennifer H Tang; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Association of insurance status and age with cervical cancer stage at diagnosis: National Cancer Database, 2000-2007.

Authors:  Stacey A Fedewa; Vilma Cokkinides; Katherine S Virgo; Priti Bandi; Debbie Saslow; Elizabeth M Ward
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Changing paradigms in the systemic treatment of advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Krista S Pfaendler; Krishnansu S Tewari
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Cervical Cancer Along with Unknown Cirrhosis: A Misdiagnosed Case.

Authors:  Soheila Aminimoghaddam; Fatemeh Mahmoudzadeh; Andisheh Maghsoudnia
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

7.  Controlling Human Papilloma Virus: A Public Health Perspective of Treatment of Anogenital Warts.

Authors:  Nadeem Tanveer
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-04-04

8.  New insights into cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Jonathan D Boone; Britt K Erickson; Warner K Huh
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 4.401

9.  Diagnosis of cervical cells based on fractal and Euclidian geometrical measurements: Intrinsic Geometric Cellular Organization.

Authors:  Signed E Prieto Bohórquez; Javier O Rodríguez Velásquez; S Catalina Correa Herrera; M Yolanda Soracipa Muñoz
Journal:  BMC Med Phys       Date:  2014-04-17

10.  Self-administered versus provider-directed sampling in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study (ACCSS): a qualitative investigation with Canadian First Nations women.

Authors:  Ingeborg Zehbe; Pamela Wakewich; Amy-Dee King; Kyla Morrisseau; Candace Tuck
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.