Literature DB >> 21263054

Pharmacodynamics of razupenem (PZ601) studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection.

Alasdair P MacGowan1, Alan Noel, Sharon Tomaselli, Heather Elliott, Karen Bowker.   

Abstract

Simulations of administration of razupenem at 1 g every 12 h by 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion were performed in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection. The antibacterial effect of this razupenem dosing regimen against six strains of Staphylococcus aureus (one methicillin-sensitive S. aureus [MSSA] strain [MIC, 0.015 μg/ml] and five methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA] strains [MIC range, 0.09 to 3 μg/ml]) and five strains of Enterobacteriaceae (three Escherichia coli strains [two containing extended-spectrum β-lactamases {ESBLs}] and two Enterobacter sp. strains [one with an AmpC enzyme and the other with a raised razupenem MIC; MIC range, 0.09 to 6 μg/ml]) was assessed. Against the MSSA and MRSA strains, razupenem produced a >3.5-log-unit reduction in viable count after 24 h. There were no changes in population profiles. In a second series of experiments, over 5 days there was rapid initial clearance of MRSA from the model followed by regrowth after 48 h. MRSA colonies appeared on 2× MIC recovery medium after 72 h with strain 33820 (MIC, 3.0 μg/ml) and at 120 h with strain 27706 (MIC, 1.5 μg/ml). Against E. coli and Enterobacter spp., razupenem produced a >3.5-log-unit reduction in bacterial counts for all strains except that with an MIC of 6 μg/ml, where razupenem had a notably poorer antibacterial effect. Population profiles were unchanged after 48 h of exposure to razupenem except for Enterobacter strain 34425 (MIC, 6.0 μg/ml), where colonies were recovered from media containing 2×, 4×, and 8× MIC. In dose-ranging studies with MRSA strains, the percentage of the dosing interval that the free drug concentration remained higher than the pathogen MIC (fT>MIC) for a 24-h bacteriostatic effect was 5.0% ± 1.4%, and that for a 1-log-unit reduction in count was 12.5% ± 5.8%. Population profiles indicated growth on 2× MIC recovery medium at fT>MIC values of 1 to 35% but not at a value of >35%. In a similar set of experiments with Enterobacteriaceae, the fT>MIC for a 24-h bacteriostatic effect was 34.2% ± 7.6% and that for a 1-log-unit reduction in count was 42.5% ± 7.8%. Population analysis profiles indicated growth on recovery media with 2×, 4×, and 8× MIC at fT>MICs in the range of 1 to 69% but rarely at values of ≥ 70%. In conclusion, razupenem at simulated human doses of 1 g i.v. every 12 h has a marked antibacterial effect on MSSA and MRSA strains with MICs of ≤ 3.0 μg/ml and Enterobacteriaceae with MICs of ≤ 0.4 μg/ml. fT>MIC targets of ≥ 35% for MRSA and ≥ 70% for Enterobacteriaceae should provide significant antibacterial effects combined with low risks of changing pathogen antibiotic population profiles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21263054      PMCID: PMC3067199          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00936-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  9 in total

1.  Pharmacodynamic profile of ertapenem against Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli in a murine thigh model.

Authors:  Dana Maglio; Mary Anne Banevicius; Christina Sutherland; Chinedum Babalola; Charles H Nightingale; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Bacterial strain-to-strain variation in pharmacodynamic index magnitude, a hitherto unconsidered factor in establishing antibiotic clinical breakpoints.

Authors:  Alasdair P MacGowan; Rosy Reynolds; Alan R Noel; Karen E Bowker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Pharmacodynamics of dalbavancin studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic system.

Authors:  Karen E Bowker; Alan R Noel; Alasdair P MacGowan
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2006-08-05       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of SM-216601, a new broad-spectrum parenteral carbapenem.

Authors:  Yutaka Ueda; Katsunori Kanazawa; Ken Eguchi; Koji Takemoto; Yoshiro Eriguchi; Makoto Sunagawa
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Activities of moxifloxacin against, and emergence of resistance in, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model.

Authors:  Alasdair P MacGowan; Chris A Rogers; H Alan Holt; Karen E Bowker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Activity of the anti-MRSA carbapenem razupenem (PTZ601) against Enterobacteriaceae with defined resistance mechanisms.

Authors:  David M Livermore; Shazad Mushtaq; Marina Warner
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Pharmacodynamics of SMP-601 (PTZ601) against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in neutropenic murine thigh infection models.

Authors:  Ken Eguchi; Katsunori Kanazawa; Yoshiro Eriguchi; Yutaka Ueda
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Resistance selection studies comparing the activity of razupenem (PTZ601) to vancomycin and linezolid against eight methicillin-resistant and two methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains.

Authors:  Catherine Clark; Klaudia Kosowska-Shick; Pamela McGhee; Bonifacio Dewasse; Linda Beachel; Peter C Appelbaum
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Pharmacodynamics of the antibacterial effect and emergence of resistance to tomopenem, formerly RO4908463/CS-023, in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Authors:  Alasdair P MacGowan; Karen E Bowker; Alan R Noel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 5.191

  9 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Suppression of Emergence of Resistance in Pathogenic Bacteria: Keeping Our Powder Dry, Part 1.

Authors:  G L Drusano; Arnold Louie; Alasdair MacGowan; William Hope
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Development of novel antibacterial drugs to combat multiple resistant organisms.

Authors:  Matteo Bassetti; Elda Righi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Pharmacodynamics of the antibacterial effect of and emergence of resistance to doripenem in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model.

Authors:  Karen E Bowker; Alan R Noel; Sharon G Tomaselli; Heather Elliott; Alasdair P Macgowan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Pharmacodynamics of ceftaroline against Staphylococcus aureus studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection.

Authors:  Alasdair P MacGowan; Alan R Noel; Sharon Tomaselli; Karen E Bowker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Pharmacodynamics of Ceftolozane plus Tazobactam Studied in an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic Model of Infection.

Authors:  Alasdair P MacGowan; Alan R Noel; Sharon G Tomaselli; Donna Nicholls; Karen E Bowker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Novel β-lactamase inhibitors: a therapeutic hope against the scourge of multidrug resistance.

Authors:  Richard R Watkins; Krisztina M Papp-Wallace; Sarah M Drawz; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 7.  Emerging Treatment Options for Infections by Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Positive Microorganisms.

Authors:  Despoina Koulenti; Elena Xu; Andrew Song; Isaac Yin Sum Mok; Drosos E Karageorgopoulos; Apostolos Armaganidis; Sotirios Tsiodras; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-01-30

8.  Pharmacodynamics of Flucloxacillin in a Neutropenic Murine Thigh Infection Model: A Piece of the Puzzle towards Evidence-Based Dosing.

Authors:  Eveline E Roelofsen; Brenda C M de Winter; Heleen van der Spek; Susan Snijders; Birgit C P Koch; Sanne van den Berg; Anouk E Muller
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-03

Review 9.  New antibiotics for bad bugs: where are we?

Authors:  Matteo Bassetti; Maria Merelli; Chiara Temperoni; Augusta Astilean
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.944

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.