Literature DB >> 23459495

Pharmacodynamics of ceftaroline against Staphylococcus aureus studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection.

Alasdair P MacGowan1, Alan R Noel, Sharon Tomaselli, Karen E Bowker.   

Abstract

An in vitro single-compartment dilutional pharmacokinetic model was used to study the pharmacodynamics of ceftaroline against Staphylococcus aureus (both methicillin-susceptible S. aureus [MSSA] and methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]). Mean serum free concentrations of ceftaroline (the active metabolite of the prodrug ceftaroline fosamil) dosed in humans at 600 mg every 12 h (q12h) were simulated, and activities against 12 S. aureus strains (3 MSSA strains and 9 MRSA strains, 3 of which had a vancomycin-intermediate phenotype) were determined. Ceftaroline produced 2.5- to 4.0-log10-unit reductions in viable counts by 24 h with all strains and a 0.5- to 4.0-log-unit drop in counts at 96 h. The antibacterial effect could not be related to the strain MIC across the ceftaroline MIC range from 0.12 to 2.0 μg/ml. In dose-ranging studies, the cumulative percentage of a 24-h period that the free drug concentration exceeded the MIC under steady-state pharmacokinetic conditions (fT(MIC)) of 24.5% ± 8.9% was associated with a 24-h bacteriostatic effect, one of 27.8% ± 9.5% was associated with a -1-log-unit drop, and one of 32.1% ± 8.1% was associated with a -2-log-unit drop. The MSSA and MRSA strains had similar fT(MIC) values. fT(MIC) values increased with increasing duration of exposure up to 96 h. Changes in ceftaroline population analysis profiles were related to fT(MIC). fT(MIC)s of <50% were associated with growth on 4× MIC recovery plates at 96 h of drug exposure. These data support the use of ceftaroline fosamil at doses of 600 mg q12h to treat S. aureus strains with MICs of ≤ 2 μg/ml. An fT(MIC) of 25 to 30% would make a suitable pharmacodynamic index target, but fTMIC values of ≥ 50% are needed to suppress the emergence of resistance and require clinical evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23459495      PMCID: PMC3716170          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01386-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  19 in total

1.  Evaluation of PPI-0903M (T91825), a novel cephalosporin: bactericidal activity, effects of modifying in vitro testing parameters and optimization of disc diffusion tests.

Authors:  Ronald N Jones; Thomas R Fritsche; Yigong Ge; Koné Kaniga; Helio S Sader
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Efficacy of human simulated exposures of ceftaroline administered at 600 milligrams every 12 hours against phenotypically diverse Staphylococcus aureus isolates.

Authors:  Rebecca A Keel; Jared L Crandon; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Pharmacodynamics of a new cephalosporin, PPI-0903 (TAK-599), active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in murine thigh and lung infection models: identification of an in vivo pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target.

Authors:  D Andes; W A Craig
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Activities of moxifloxacin against, and emergence of resistance in, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model.

Authors:  Alasdair P MacGowan; Chris A Rogers; H Alan Holt; Karen E Bowker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Postantibiotic effect of ceftaroline against gram-positive organisms.

Authors:  G A Pankuch; P C Appelbaum
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  In vivo pharmacodynamics of ceftobiprole against multiple bacterial pathogens in murine thigh and lung infection models.

Authors:  W A Craig; D R Andes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Binding of ceftaroline to penicillin-binding proteins of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  Hélène Moisan; Mireille Pruneau; François Malouin
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  In vitro activity of ceftaroline against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus in a hollow fiber model.

Authors:  Céline Vidaillac; Steve N Leonard; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Pharmacodynamics of the antibacterial effect and emergence of resistance to tomopenem, formerly RO4908463/CS-023, in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Authors:  Alasdair P MacGowan; Karen E Bowker; Alan R Noel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Pharmacodynamic profiling of ceftobiprole for treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections.

Authors:  Holly Kimko; Xu Xu; Partha Nandy; Mahesh N Samtani; Richard S Strauss; Partha Bagchi; Gary J Noel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Suppression of Emergence of Resistance in Pathogenic Bacteria: Keeping Our Powder Dry, Part 1.

Authors:  G L Drusano; Arnold Louie; Alasdair MacGowan; William Hope
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Penetration of Ceftaroline into the Epithelial Lining Fluid of Healthy Adult Subjects.

Authors:  Todd A Riccobene; Richard Pushkin; Alena Jandourek; William Knebel; Tatiana Khariton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Comparison of in vivo and in vitro pharmacodynamics of a humanized regimen of 600 milligrams of Ceftaroline Fosamil every 12 hours against Staphylococcus aureus at initial inocula of 106 and 108 CFU per milliliter.

Authors:  Wonhee So; Jared L Crandon; George G Zhanel; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Pharmacokinetics of ceftaroline in normal body weight and obese (classes I, II, and III) healthy adult subjects.

Authors:  Julie Ann Justo; Stockton M Mayer; Manjunath P Pai; Melinda M Soriano; Larry H Danziger; Richard M Novak; Keith A Rodvold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  A critical review on the clinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical trials of ceftaroline.

Authors:  Tony K L Kiang; Kyle J Wilby; Mary H H Ensom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  The Tipper-Strominger Hypothesis and Triggering of Allostery in Penicillin-Binding Protein 2a of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Authors:  Jennifer Fishovitz; Negin Taghizadeh; Jed F Fisher; Mayland Chang; Shahriar Mobashery
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 7.  Ceftaroline Fosamil: A Review in Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections and Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  In vitro activity of human-simulated epithelial lining fluid exposures of ceftaroline, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin against methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Shawn H MacVane; Wonhee So; David P Nicolau; Joseph L Kuti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Single- and Repeated-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Ceftaroline in Plasma and Soft Tissues of Healthy Volunteers for Two Different Dosing Regimens of Ceftaroline Fosamil.

Authors:  Peter Matzneller; Edith Lackner; Heimo Lagler; Beatrix Wulkersdorfer; Zoe Österreicher; Markus Zeitlinger
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  One Size Fits All? Application of Susceptible-Dose-Dependent Breakpoints to Pediatric Patients and Laboratory Reporting.

Authors:  Lindsey E Nielsen; Jeanne B Forrester; Jennifer Ellis Girotto; Aimee M Dassner; Romney Humphries
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.