Literature DB >> 21262810

Selection of distinct Hox-Extradenticle interaction modes fine-tunes Hox protein activity.

Mehdi Saadaoui1, Samir Merabet, Isma Litim-Mecheri, Elise Arbeille, Nagraj Sambrani, Wim Damen, Carlo Brena, Jacques Pradel, Yacine Graba.   

Abstract

Hox genes encode transcription factors widely used for diversifying animal body plans in development and evolution. To achieve functional specificity, Hox proteins associate with PBC class proteins, Pre-B cell leukemia homeobox (Pbx) in vertebrates, and Extradenticle (Exd) in Drosophila, and were thought to use a unique hexapeptide-dependent generic mode of interaction. Recent findings, however, revealed the existence of an alternative, UbdA-dependent paralog-specific interaction mode providing diversity in Hox-PBC interactions. In this study, we investigated the basis for the selection of one of these two Hox-PBC interaction modes. Using naturally occurring variations and mutations in the Drosophila Ultrabithorax protein, we found that the linker region, a short domain separating the hexapeptide from the homeodomain, promotes an interaction mediated by the UbdA domain in a context-dependent manner. While using a UbdA-dependent interaction for the repression of the limb-promoting gene Distalless, interaction with Exd during segment-identity specification still relies on the hexapeptide motif. We further show that distinctly assembled Hox-PBC complexes display subtle but distinct repressive activities. These findings identify Hox-PBC interaction as a template for subtle regulation of Hox protein activity that may have played a major role in the diversification of Hox protein function in development and evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21262810      PMCID: PMC3038764          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1006964108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  38 in total

Review 1.  Hox clusters and bilaterian phylogeny.

Authors:  Guillaume Balavoine; Renaud de Rosa; André Adoutte
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.286

2.  The pentapeptide motif of Hox proteins is required for cooperative DNA binding with Pbx1, physically contacts Pbx1, and enhances DNA binding by Pbx1.

Authors:  P S Knoepfler; M P Kamps
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Extradenticle protein is a selective cofactor for the Drosophila homeotics: role of the homeodomain and YPWM amino acid motif in the interaction.

Authors:  F B Johnson; E Parker; M A Krasnow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-01-31       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Embryonic expression patterns of the Hox genes of the crayfish Procambarus clarkii (Crustacea, Decapoda).

Authors:  A Abzhanov; T C Kaufman
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.930

5.  Evolution of a transcriptional repression domain in an insect Hox protein.

Authors:  Ron Galant; Sean B Carroll
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-06       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Hox protein mutation and macroevolution of the insect body plan.

Authors:  Matthew Ronshaugen; Nadine McGinnis; William McGinnis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-06       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The segment identity functions of Ultrabithorax are contained within its homeo domain and carboxy-terminal sequences.

Authors:  S K Chan; R S Mann
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Evolutionary conservation of the structure and expression of alternatively spliced Ultrabithorax isoforms from Drosophila.

Authors:  H M Bomze; A J López
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The developmental effect of overexpressing a Ubx product in Drosophila embryos is dependent on its interactions with other homeotic products.

Authors:  A González-Reyes; G Morata
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-05-04       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Hox repression of a target gene: extradenticle-independent, additive action through multiple monomer binding sites.

Authors:  Ron Galant; Christopher M Walsh; Sean B Carroll
Journal:  Development       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  23 in total

1.  Variable motif utilization in homeotic selector (Hox)-cofactor complex formation controls specificity.

Authors:  Katherine M Lelli; Barbara Noro; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A conserved genetic mechanism specifies deutocerebral appendage identity in insects and arachnids.

Authors:  Prashant P Sharma; Oscar A Tarazona; Davys H Lopez; Evelyn E Schwager; Martin J Cohn; Ward C Wheeler; Cassandra G Extavour
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Disentangling the many layers of eukaryotic transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  Katherine M Lelli; Matthew Slattery; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 16.830

4.  Intrinsic DNA Shape Accounts for Affinity Differences between Hox-Cofactor Binding Sites.

Authors:  Tim Zeiske; Nithya Baburajendran; Anna Kaczynska; Julia Brasch; Arthur G Palmer; Lawrence Shapiro; Barry Honig; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 9.423

5.  Competition for cofactor-dependent DNA binding underlies Hox phenotypic suppression.

Authors:  Barbara Noro; Katherine Lelli; Liping Sun; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 6.  To Be Specific or Not: The Critical Relationship Between Hox And TALE Proteins.

Authors:  Samir Merabet; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 7.  Hox regulation of transcription: more complex(es).

Authors:  Franck Ladam; Charles G Sagerström
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.780

8.  The intrinsically disordered regions of the Drosophila melanogaster Hox protein ultrabithorax select interacting proteins based on partner topology.

Authors:  Hao-Ching Hsiao; Kim L Gonzalez; Daniel J Catanese; Kristopher E Jordy; Kathleen S Matthews; Sarah E Bondos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Distinct molecular strategies for Hox-mediated limb suppression in Drosophila: from cooperativity to dispensability/antagonism in TALE partnership.

Authors:  Nagraj Sambrani; Bruno Hudry; Corinne Maurel-Zaffran; Amel Zouaz; Rakesh Mishra; Samir Merabet; Yacine Graba
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Genetic and functional modularity of Hox activities in the specification of limb-innervating motor neurons.

Authors:  Julie Lacombe; Olivia Hanley; Heekyung Jung; Polyxeni Philippidou; Gulsen Surmeli; Jonathan Grinstein; Jeremy S Dasen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.