| Literature DB >> 21261885 |
J I Sanchez1, M Marzorati, C Grootaert, M Baran, V Van Craeyveld, C M Courtin, W F Broekaert, J A Delcour, W Verstraete, T Van de Wiele.
Abstract
Arabinoxylan-oligosaccharides (AXOS) are a recently newly discovered class of candidate prebiotics as - depending on their structure - they are fermented in different regions of gastrointestinal tract. This can have an impact on the protein/carbohydrate fermentation balance in the large intestine and, thus, affect the generation of potentially toxic metabolites in the colon originating from proteolytic activity. In this study, we screened different AXOS preparations for their impact on the in vitro intestinal fermentation activity and microbial community structure. Short-term fermentation experiments with AXOS with an average degree of polymerization (avDP) of 29 allowed part of the oligosaccharides to reach the distal colon, and decreased the concentration of proteolytic markers, whereas AXOS with lower avDP were primarily fermented in the proximal colon. Additionally, prolonged supplementation of AXOS with avDP 29 to the Simulator of Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem (SHIME) reactor decreased levels of the toxic proteolytic markers phenol and p-cresol in the two distal colon compartments and increased concentrations of beneficial short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) in all colon vessels (25-48%). Denaturant gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis indicated that AXOS supplementation only slightly modified the total microbial community, implying that the observed effects on fermentation markers are mainly caused by changes in fermentation activity. Finally, specific quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis showed that AXOS supplementation significantly increased the amount of health-promoting lactobacilli as well as of Bacteroides-Prevotella and Clostridium coccoides-Eubacterium rectale groups. These data allow concluding that AXOS are promising candidates to modulate the microbial metabolism in the distal colon. Journal compilationEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 21261885 PMCID: PMC3815425 DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2008.00064.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Biotechnol ISSN: 1751-7915 Impact factor: 5.813
Assessment of non‐digestibility of AXOS 3‐0.09 and AXOS 67‐0.58 in batch experiments simulating stomach and small intestine conditions.
| Incubation | Time (h) | xylose (mg l−1) | arabinose (mg l−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| AXOS 3 in stomach | 0 | 2.4 ± 0.3 | 1.9 ± 0.4 |
| 2 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.6 | |
| AXOS 67 in stomach | 0 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.3 |
| 2 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | |
| AXOS 3 in small intestine | 0 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.5 |
| 2 | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.5 | |
| AXOS 67 in small intestine | 0 | 1.9 ± 0.4 | 1.3 ± 0.3 |
| 2 | 1.5 ± 0.0 | 1.2 ± 0.3 |
The amount of released xylose and arabinose are reported as mg l−1. Data are means ± SD. The theoretical yield of sugars from AXOS 3‐0.09 is 49.56 and 4.38 mg l−1 xylose and arabinose respectively; from AXOS 67‐0.58 is 38.82 and 10.38 mg l−1.
Figure 1Concentration of AXOS (A), phenol (B) and p‐cresol (C) after successive batch incubations simulating the conditions of the ascending colon (18 h, pH 5.9), transverse colon (30 h, pH 6.2) and descending colon (22 h, pH 6.7) of the SHIME. Concentration of AXOS was determined as (Arabinose + Xylose) × 0.88. Initial AXOS concentration was 6.0 g l−1. AXOS preparations are reported in the legend and below the bars in terms of specific degree of polymerization and degree of substitution [i.e. for the diamond in (A), 3 and 0.09 respectively].
Concentration of SCFA, ammonium ions, phenol, p‐cresol and activity of AXOS‐degrading enzymes measured in the three vessels of the SHIME during the basal period (n ≥ 5), treatment with AXOS 29‐0.30 (n ≥ 9) and washout period (n ≥ 5).a
| Basal period | Treatment | Washout | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCFA (mmol l−1) | Acetate | 22.5 ± 3.1 | 25.4 ± 3.2 | 21.3 ± 3.2 |
| Propionate | 13.7 ± 2.1 | 17.0 ± 2.1 | 15.9 ± 1.7 | |
| Butyrate | 3.1 ± 1.4 | 5.8 ± 1.3 | 5.1 ± 0.9 | |
| Other SCFA | 1.1 ± 0.4 | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | |
| Total SCFA | 40.4 ± 7.1 | 50.2 ± 7.0 | 44.1 ± 5.9 | |
| Proteolytic markers (mg l−1) | Ammonium | 183 ± 48 | 292 ± 27 | 237 ± 2 |
| Phenol | 0.41 ± 0.13 | 0.55 ± 0.46 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | |
| p‐Cresol | ND | ND | ND | |
| AXOS‐degrading enzymes (AU) | β‐ | 3.1 ± 3.0 | 10.2 ± 7.0 | 2.5 ± 2.0 |
| α‐ | 5.1 ± 4.2 | 12.4 ± 7.6 | 20.1 ± 4.7 | |
| Endo‐1,4‐β‐xylanase | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 1.52 ± 0.70 | 1.30 ± 0.02 | |
| SCFA (mmol l−1) | Acetate | 26.8 ± 1.0 | 34.8 ± 5.3 | 30.4 ± 2.5 |
| Propionate | 16.7 ± 1.6 | 23.8 ± 2.0 | 22.9 ± 2.5 | |
| Butyrate | 3.5 ± 1.1 | 7.8 ± 1.3 | 7.1 ± 1.8 | |
| Other SCFA | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 2.9 ± 0.4 | 2.5 ± 0.6 | |
| Total SCFA | 49.5 ± 4.0 | 69.3 ± 9.0 | 62.9 ± 7.3 | |
| Proteolytic markers (mg l−1) | Ammonium | 296 ± 18 | 384 ± 73 | 364 ± 20 |
| Phenol | 6.27 ± 1.33 | 6.0 ± 1.0 | 4.55 ± 1.11 | |
| p‐Cresol | 0.41 ± 0.29 | 0.25 ± 0.21 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | |
| AXOS‐degrading enzymes (AU) | β‐ | 3.0 ± 3.2 | 25.6 ± 6.1 | 14.6 ± 5.0 |
| α‐ | 7.0 ± 5.0 | 58.4 ± 10.0 | 28.4 ± 20.2 | |
| Endo‐1,4‐β‐xylanase | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 2.0 ± 0.5 | 0.4 ± 0.03 | |
| SCFA (mmol l−1) | Acetate | 33.1 ± 3.5 | 37.3 ± 2.7 | 33.5 ± 1.9 |
| Propionate | 16.3 ± 2.7 | 22.7 ± 2.7 | 21.8 ± 0.8 | |
| Butyrate | 4.2 ± 1.2 | 8.0 ± 1.3 | 6.4 ± 1.7 | |
| Other SCFA | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 2.5 ± 1.1 | 3.2 ± 2.1 | |
| Total SCFA | 55.4 ± 7.6 | 70.5 ± 6.9 | 64.9 ± 6.5 | |
| Proteolytic markers (mg l−1) | Ammonium | 321 ± 8 | 431 ± 62 | 398 ± 30 |
| Phenol | 7.87 ± 1.20 | 6.39 ± 0.63 | 4.69 ± 1.27 | |
| p‐Cresol | 0.28 ± 0.10 | 0.21 ± 0.15 | 0.08 ± 0.09 | |
| AXOS‐degrading enzymes (AU) | β‐ | 4.2 ± 0.9 | 23.3 ± 4 | 8.0 ± 4.1 |
| α‐ | 19.1 ± 4.0 | 56.7 ± 6.1 | 31.6 ± 4.8 | |
| Endo‐1,4‐β‐xylanase | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 1.81 ± 0.70 | 0.90 ± 0.31 | |
Data are means ± SD.
Sum of valerate, isovalerate and isobutyrate.
Significantly different from basal period (Student's two‐tailed t‐test, P < 0.05).
ND, not detected.
Total aerobes and anaerobes microbial Log counts in the colon vessels of the SHIME reactor during basal period (n = 4), 3 weeks of treatment (n = 6) and washout period (n = 4).a
| Bacterial group | Period | CA | CT | CD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total aerobes | Basal | 8.2 ± 0.53 | 7.8 ± 0.69 | 7.6 + 0.65 |
| Treatment | 8.4 ± 0.69 | 8.4 ± 0.77 | 8.1 + 0.87 | |
| Washout | 7.7 ± 0.31 | 7.9 ± 0.21 | 7.5 + 0.18 | |
| Total anaerobes | Basal | 8.2 ± 0.34 | 8.0 ± 0.21 | 7.6 ± 0.39 |
| Treatment | 8.4 ± 0.75 | 8.4 ± 0.79 | 8.2 ± 0.86 | |
| Washout | 7.9 ± 0.29 | 8.3 ± 0.76 | 8.3 ± 0.82 |
Data are means ± SD.
CA, colon ascending; CD, colon descending; CT, colon transversum.
Figure 2DGGE fingerprint patterns for total bacteria on 45–60% denaturant gradient. Clustering analysis is based on the Pearson product–moment correlation coefficient and dendrograms were created by using UPGMA linkage. V1 refers to ascending colon, V2 to transverse colon and V3 to descending colon. Samples are named as follows: VxWy, where x represents the number of the vessel and y the week of the sampling. Dashed squares indicate subclusters of samples within the same colon compartment, following AXOS supplementation. Black full square and the arrow indicate the band that is enriched following AXOS supplementation.
Figure 3Concentrations of bifidobacteria (A), lactobacilli (B), Clostridium coccoides–Eubacterium rectale group (C) and Bacteroides–Prevotella group (D) in the intestinal suspension from the three colon vessels, derived from quantitative PCR. Black bars refer to the basal period; dark grey bars to the treatment period; light grey bars to the washout period. Below each bar is indicated a number, the percentage of the analysed group on the total of the microbial community. Asterisks indicate those bars that are significantly different from the basal period (P < 0.05).