Literature DB >> 29500265

Complementary Mechanisms for Degradation of Inulin-Type Fructans and Arabinoxylan Oligosaccharides among Bifidobacterial Strains Suggest Bacterial Cooperation.

Audrey Rivière1, Marija Selak1, Annelies Geirnaert2, Pieter Van den Abbeele2, Luc De Vuyst3.   

Abstract

Inulin-type fructans (ITF) and arabinoxylan oligosaccharides (AXOS) are broken down to different extents by various bifidobacterial strains present in the human colon. To date, phenotypic heterogeneity in the consumption of these complex oligosaccharides at the strain level remains poorly studied. To examine mechanistic variations in ITF and AXOS constituent preferences present in one individual, ITF and AXOS consumption by bifidobacterial strains isolated from the simulator of the human intestinal microbial ecosystem (SHIME) after inoculation with feces from one healthy individual was investigated. Among the 18 strains identified, four species-independent clusters displaying different ITF and AXOS degradation mechanisms and preferences were found. Bifidobacterium bifidum B46 showed limited growth on all substrates, whereas B. longum B24 and B. longum B18 could grow better on short-chain-length fractions of fructooligosaccharides (FOS) than on fructose. B. longum B24 could cleave arabinose substituents of AXOS extracellularly, without using the AXOS-derived xylose backbones, whereas B. longum B18 was able to consume oligosaccharides (up to xylotetraose) preferentially and consumed AXOS to a limited extent. B. adolescentis B72 degraded all fractions of FOS simultaneously, partially degraded inulin, and could use xylose backbones longer than xylotetraose extracellularly. The strain-specific degradation mechanisms were suggested to be complementary and indicated resource partitioning. Specialization in the degradation of complex carbohydrates by bifidobacteria present on the individual level could have in vivo implications for the successful implementation of ITF and AXOS, aiming at bifidogenic and/or butyrogenic effects. Finally, this work shows the importance of taking microbial strain-level differences into account in gut microbiota research.IMPORTANCE It is well known that bifidobacteria degrade undigestible complex polysaccharides, such as ITF and AXOS, in the human colon. However, this process has never been studied for strains coexisting in the same individual. To examine strain-dependent mechanistic variations in ITF and AXOS constituent preferences present in one individual, ITF and AXOS consumption by bifidobacterial strains isolated from the SHIME after inoculation with feces from one healthy individual was investigated. Among the 18 bifidobacterial strains identified, four species-independent clusters displaying different ITF and AXOS degradation mechanisms and preferences were found, indicating that such strains can coexist in the human colon. Such specialization in the degradation of complex carbohydrates by bifidobacteria present on the individual level could have in vivo implications for the successful implementation of ITF and AXOS, aiming at bifidogenic and/or butyrogenic effects.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arabinoxylan oligosaccharides; bifidobacteria; colon fermentation; inulin-type fructans; prebiotics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29500265      PMCID: PMC5930331          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02893-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  67 in total

1.  Microbial community development in a dynamic gut model is reproducible, colon region specific, and selective for Bacteroidetes and Clostridium cluster IX.

Authors:  Pieter Van den Abbeele; Charlotte Grootaert; Massimo Marzorati; Sam Possemiers; Willy Verstraete; Philippe Gérard; Sylvie Rabot; Aurélia Bruneau; Sahar El Aidy; Muriel Derrien; Erwin Zoetendal; Michiel Kleerebezem; Hauke Smidt; Tom Van de Wiele
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  The gut flora as a forgotten organ.

Authors:  Ann M O'Hara; Fergus Shanahan
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Development of an ion-exchange chromatography method for monitoring the degradation of prebiotic arabinoxylan-oligosaccharides in a complex fermentation medium.

Authors:  Audrey Rivière; Sebastiaan Eeltink; Christophe Pierlot; Tom Balzarini; Frédéric Moens; Marija Selak; Luc De Vuyst
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  The genome sequence of Bifidobacterium longum reflects its adaptation to the human gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Mark A Schell; Maria Karmirantzou; Berend Snel; David Vilanova; Bernard Berger; Gabriella Pessi; Marie-Camille Zwahlen; Frank Desiere; Peer Bork; Michele Delley; R David Pridmore; Fabrizio Arigoni
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Bifidobacterial inulin-type fructan degradation capacity determines cross-feeding interactions between bifidobacteria and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii.

Authors:  Frédéric Moens; Stefan Weckx; Luc De Vuyst
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 5.277

Review 6.  Bifidobacteria: their impact on gut microbiota composition and their applications as probiotics in infants.

Authors:  Diana Di Gioia; Irene Aloisio; Giuseppe Mazzola; Bruno Biavati
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Selective carbohydrate utilization by lactobacilli and bifidobacteria.

Authors:  D Watson; M O'Connell Motherway; M H C Schoterman; R J Joost van Neerven; A Nauta; D van Sinderen
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 8.  Pathogenic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  James B Kaper; James P Nataro; Harry L Mobley
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 60.633

9.  Cross-feeding by Bifidobacterium breve UCC2003 during co-cultivation with Bifidobacterium bifidum PRL2010 in a mucin-based medium.

Authors:  Muireann Egan; Mary O'Connell Motherway; Michelle Kilcoyne; Marian Kane; Lokesh Joshi; Marco Ventura; Douwe van Sinderen
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Comparative Genomics Revealed Genetic Diversity and Species/Strain-Level Differences in Carbohydrate Metabolism of Three Probiotic Bifidobacterial Species.

Authors:  Toshitaka Odamaki; Ayako Horigome; Hirosuke Sugahara; Nanami Hashikura; Junichi Minami; Jin-Zhong Xiao; Fumiaki Abe
Journal:  Int J Genomics       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 2.326

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Pseudomonad reverse carbon catabolite repression, interspecies metabolite exchange, and consortial division of labor.

Authors:  Heejoon Park; S Lee McGill; Adrienne D Arnold; Ross P Carlson
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Multiple stable states in microbial communities explained by the stable marriage problem.

Authors:  Akshit Goyal; Veronika Dubinkina; Sergei Maslov
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 3.  Evolutionary Insights Into Microbiota Transplantation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Xiaoli Wang; Jingwen Zhao; Yuanhang Feng; Zelin Feng; Yulin Ye; Limin Liu; Guangbo Kang; Xiaocang Cao
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 6.073

Review 4.  Probiotics and prebiotics in intestinal health and disease: from biology to the clinic.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Sanders; Daniel J Merenstein; Gregor Reid; Glenn R Gibson; Robert A Rastall
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 5.  The impact of the Fungus-Host-Microbiota interplay upon Candida albicans infections: current knowledge and new perspectives.

Authors:  Christophe d'Enfert; Ann-Kristin Kaune; Leovigildo-Rey Alaban; Sayoni Chakraborty; Nathaniel Cole; Margot Delavy; Daria Kosmala; Benoît Marsaux; Ricardo Fróis-Martins; Moran Morelli; Diletta Rosati; Marisa Valentine; Zixuan Xie; Yoan Emritloll; Peter A Warn; Frédéric Bequet; Marie-Elisabeth Bougnoux; Stephanie Bornes; Mark S Gresnigt; Bernhard Hube; Ilse D Jacobsen; Mélanie Legrand; Salomé Leibundgut-Landmann; Chaysavanh Manichanh; Carol A Munro; Mihai G Netea; Karla Queiroz; Karine Roget; Vincent Thomas; Claudia Thoral; Pieter Van den Abbeele; Alan W Walker; Alistair J P Brown
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 16.408

6.  Colonic In Vitro Model Assessment of the Prebiotic Potential of Bread Fortified with Polyphenols Rich Olive Fiber.

Authors:  Lorenzo Nissen; Flavia Casciano; Elena Chiarello; Mattia Di Nunzio; Alessandra Bordoni; Andrea Gianotti
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Characterisation of a Hydroxycinnamic Acid Esterase From the Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum Taxon.

Authors:  Sandra M Kelly; John O'Callaghan; Mike Kinsella; Douwe van Sinderen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 8.  Shaping the Infant Microbiome With Non-digestible Carbohydrates.

Authors:  Stella Verkhnyatskaya; Michela Ferrari; Paul de Vos; Marthe T C Walvoort
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Revisiting the Metabolic Capabilities of Bifidobacterium longum susbp. longum and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis from a Glycoside Hydrolase Perspective.

Authors:  Guillermo Blanco; Lorena Ruiz; Hector Tamés; Patricia Ruas-Madiedo; Florentino Fdez-Riverola; Borja Sánchez; Anália Lourenço; Abelardo Margolles
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-05-13

10.  Genotyping and plant-derived glycan utilization analysis of Bifidobacterium strains from mother-infant pairs.

Authors:  Zeyu Kan; Baolong Luo; Jingjing Cai; Yan Zhang; Fengwei Tian; Yongqing Ni
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.