Literature DB >> 21261423

Semantic integration as a boundary condition on inhibitory processes in episodic retrieval.

Leilani B Goodmon1, Michael C Anderson.   

Abstract

Recalling an experience often impairs the later retention of related traces, a phenomenon known as retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF). Research has shown that episodic associations protect competing memories from RIF (Anderson & McCulloch, 1999). We report 4 experiments that examined whether semantic associations also protect against RIF. In all experiments, robust RIF occurred when there were few associations between practiced and nonpracticed sets, but RIF was abolished when there were many. The benefits of semantic integration were independent of episodic integration strategies and were not mediated by intentional use of the associations. Rather, these results establish a new boundary condition on RIF--semantic integration--that has a potent impact on the magnitude of RIF and may explain variability in the RIF phenomenon. 2011 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21261423     DOI: 10.1037/a0021963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  15 in total

1.  Interoperation transfer in Chinese-English bilinguals' arithmetic.

Authors:  Jamie I D Campbell; Roxanne R Dowd
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

2.  Low involvement of preexisting associations makes retrieval-induced forgetting long lasting.

Authors:  Almudena Ortega; Carlos J Gómez-Ariza; Julia Morales; M Teresa Bajo
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-04-03

3.  A progress report on the inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting.

Authors:  Benjamin C Storm; Benjamin J Levy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-08

4.  Explanation can cause Forgetting: Memory Dynamics in the Generation of New Arguments.

Authors:  Julia S Soares; Benjamin C Storm
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-10

5.  Semantic relatedness retroactively boosts memory and promotes memory interdependence across episodes.

Authors:  James W Antony; America Romero; Anthony H Vierra; Rebecca S Luenser; Robert D Hawkins; Kelly A Bennion
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 8.713

6.  That's a good idea, but let's keep thinking! Can we prevent our initial ideas from being forgotten as a consequence of thinking of new ideas?

Authors:  Annie S Ditta; Benjamin C Storm
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-04-28

7.  Forgetting "Novel" but Not "Dragon": The Role of Age of Acquisition on Intentional and Incidental Forgetting.

Authors:  Alejandra Marful; Carlos J Gómez-Ariza; Analía Barbón; Teresa Bajo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  High working memory capacity predicts less retrieval induced forgetting.

Authors:  Jonathan T Mall; Candice C Morey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Opposing mechanisms support the voluntary forgetting of unwanted memories.

Authors:  Roland G Benoit; Michael C Anderson
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  On the reliability of retrieval-induced forgetting.

Authors:  Christopher A Rowland; Lauren E Bates; Edward L DeLosh
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.