Literature DB >> 21261274

Laser-induced forward transfer of polymer light-emitting diode pixels with increased charge injection.

James Shaw-Stewart1, Thomas Lippert, Matthias Nagel, Frank Nüesch, Alexander Wokaun.   

Abstract

Laser-induced forward transfer (LIFT) has been used to print 0.6 mm × 0.5 mm polymer light-emitting diode (PLED) pixels with poly[2-methoxy, 5-(2-ethylhexyloxy)-1,4-phenylene vinylene] (MEH-PPV) as the light-emitting polymer. The donor substrate used in the LIFT process is covered by a sacrificial triazene polymer (TP) release layer on top of which the aluminium cathode and functional MEH-PPV layers are deposited. To enhance electron injection into the MEH-PPV layer, a thin poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) layer on the Al cathode or a blend of MEH-PPV and PEO was used. These donor substrates have been transferred onto both plain indium tin oxide (ITO) and bilayer ITO/PEDOT:PSS (poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) poly(styrenesulfonate) blend) receiver substrates to create the PLED pixels. For comparison, devices were fabricated in a conventional manner on ITO substrates coated with a PEDOT:PSS hole-transporting layer. Compared to multilayer devices without PEO, devices with ITO/PEDOT:PSS/MEH-PPV:PEO blend/Al architecture show a 100 fold increase of luminous efficiency (LE) reaching a maximum of 0.45 cd/A for the blend at a brightness of 400 cd/m(2). A similar increase is obtained for the polymer light-emitting diode (PLED) pixels deposited by the LIFT process, although the maximum luminous efficiency only reaches 0.05 cd/A for MEH-PPV:PEO blend, which we have attributed to the fact that LIFT transfer was carried out in an ambient atmosphere. For all devices, we confirm a strong increase in device performance and stability when using a PEDOT:PSS film on the ITO anode. For PLEDs produced by LIFT, we show that a 25 nm thick PEDOT:PSS layer on the ITO receiver substrate considerably reduces the laser fluence required for pixel transfer from 250 mJ/cm(2) without the layer to only 80 mJ/cm(2) with the layer.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21261274     DOI: 10.1021/am100943f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces        ISSN: 1944-8244            Impact factor:   9.229


  5 in total

1.  Generation of Cost-Effective Paper-Based Tissue Models through Matrix-Assisted Sacrificial 3D Printing.

Authors:  Feng Cheng; Xia Cao; Hongbin Li; Tingting Liu; Xin Xie; Di Huang; Sushila Maharjan; Ho Pan Bei; Ameyalli Gómez; Jun Li; Haoqun Zhan; Haokai Shen; Sanwei Liu; Jinmei He; Yu Shrike Zhang
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 11.189

2.  Indium Tin Oxide-Free Inverted Organic Photovoltaics Using Laser-Induced Forward Transfer Silver Nanoparticle Embedded Metal Grids.

Authors:  Sergey M Pozov; Kostas Andritsos; Ioannis Theodorakos; Efthymios Georgiou; Apostolos Ioakeimidis; Ayala Kabla; Semyon Melamed; Fernando de la Vega; Ioanna Zergioti; Stelios A Choulis
Journal:  ACS Appl Electron Mater       Date:  2022-06-02

3.  Additive and Photochemical Manufacturing of Copper.

Authors:  Winco K C Yung; Bo Sun; Zhengong Meng; Junfeng Huang; Yingdi Jin; Hang Shan Choy; Zhixiang Cai; Guijun Li; Cheuk Lam Ho; Jinlong Yang; Wai Yeung Wong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Modulation of Interfacial Adhesion Using Semicrystalline Shape-Memory Polymers.

Authors:  Soyoun Kim; Sanjay Lakshmanan; Jinhai Li; Mitchell Anthamatten; John Lambropoulos; Alexander A Shestopalov
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.882

Review 5.  3D Printing at Micro-Level: Laser-Induced Forward Transfer and Two-Photon Polymerization.

Authors:  Muhammad Arif Mahmood; Andrei C Popescu
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 4.329

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.