Literature DB >> 21259308

Bayesian inference for disease prevalence using negative binomial group testing.

Nicholas A Pritchard1, Joshua M Tebbs.   

Abstract

Group testing, also known as pooled testing, and inverse sampling are both widely used methods of data collection when the goal is to estimate a small proportion. Taking a Bayesian approach, we consider the new problem of estimating disease prevalence from group testing when inverse (negative binomial) sampling is used. Using different distributions to incorporate prior knowledge of disease incidence and different loss functions, we derive closed form expressions for posterior distributions and resulting point and credible interval estimators. We then evaluate our new estimators, on Bayesian and classical grounds, and apply our methods to a West Nile Virus data set.
Copyright © 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21259308      PMCID: PMC3119490          DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201000148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biom J        ISSN: 0323-3847            Impact factor:   2.207


  7 in total

1.  The efficiency of pooling in the detection of rare mutations.

Authors:  J L Gastwirth
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Empirical Bayesian estimation of the disease transmission probability in multiple-vector-transfer designs.

Authors:  Christopher R Bilder; Joshua M Tebbs
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.207

3.  Bayesian inference for prevalence and diagnostic test accuracy based on dual-pooled screening.

Authors:  Timothy E Hanson; Wesley O Johnson; Joseph L Gastwirth
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Important experimental parameters for determining infection rates in arthropod vectors using pool screening approaches.

Authors:  Charles R Katholi; Thomas R Unnasch
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.345

5.  Estimating Disease Prevalence Using Inverse Binomial Pooled Testing.

Authors:  Nicholas A Pritchard; Joshua M Tebbs
Journal:  J Agric Biol Environ Stat       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 1.524

6.  Informative Retesting.

Authors:  Christopher R Bilder; Joshua M Tebbs; Peng Chen
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  West Nile virus infection rates in Culex nigripalpus (Diptera: Culicidae) do not reflect transmission rates in Florida.

Authors:  C Roxanne Rutledge; Jonathan F Day; Cynthia C Lord; Lillian M Stark; Walter J Tabachnick
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.278

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Sample size under inverse negative binomial group testing for accuracy in parameter estimation.

Authors:  Osval Antonio Montesinos-López; Abelardo Montesinos-López; José Crossa; Kent Eskridge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A Bayesian Approach to Modeling Risk of Hospital Admissions Associated With Schizophrenia Accounting for Underdiagnosis of the Disorder in Administrative Records.

Authors:  Eileen M Stock; James D Stamey; John E Zeber; Alexander W Thompson; Laurel A Copeland
Journal:  Comput Psychiatr       Date:  2018-02-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.