Literature DB >> 21258925

Saccade control in natural images is shaped by the information visible at fixation: evidence from asymmetric gaze-contingent windows.

Tom Foulsham1, Robert Teszka, Alan Kingstone.   

Abstract

When people view images, their saccades are predominantly horizontal and show a positively skewed distribution of amplitudes. How are these patterns affected by the information close to fixation and the features in the periphery? We recorded saccades while observers encoded a set of scenes with a gaze-contingent window at fixation: Features inside a rectangular (Experiment 1) or elliptical (Experiment 2) window were intact; peripheral background was masked completely or blurred. When the window was asymmetric, with more information preserved either horizontally or vertically, saccades tended to follow the information within the window, rather than exploring unseen regions, which runs counter to the idea that saccades function to maximize information gain on each fixation. Window shape also affected fixation and amplitude distributions, but horizontal windows had less of an impact. The findings suggest that saccades follow the features currently being processed and that normal vision samples these features from a horizontally elongated region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21258925     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-010-0014-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  11 in total

1.  The Mechanism of Macular Sparing.

Authors:  Jonathan C Horton; John R Economides; Daniel L Adams
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 6.422

2.  Eye movements during visual search in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  Nicholas D Smith; Fiona C Glen; David P Crabb
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 2.209

3.  Can changes in eye movement scanning alter the age-related deficit in recognition memory?

Authors:  Jessica P K Chan; Daphne Kamino; Malcolm A Binns; Jennifer D Ryan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-05-12

4.  Start position strongly influences fixation patterns during face processing: difficulties with eye movements as a measure of information use.

Authors:  Joseph Arizpe; Dwight J Kravitz; Galit Yovel; Chris I Baker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Top-down influence on gaze patterns in the presence of social features.

Authors:  Aleya Felicia Flechsenhar; Matthias Gamer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Eye Movement Dynamics Differ between Encoding and Recognition of Faces.

Authors:  Joseph M Arizpe; Danielle L Noles; Jack W Tsao; Annie W-Y Chan
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-12

7.  Looking (for) patterns: Similarities and differences between infant and adult free scene-viewing patterns.

Authors:  Daan R van Renswoude; Maartje E J Raijmakers; Ingmar Visser
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 0.957

8.  Microsaccadic rate signatures correlate under monocular and binocular stimulation conditions.

Authors:  Peter Essig; Alexander Leube; Katharina Rifai; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 0.957

9.  Eye and head movements are complementary in visual selection.

Authors:  Grayden J F Solman; Tom Foulsham; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Attentional Selection of Social Features Persists Despite Restricted Bottom-Up Information and Affects Temporal Viewing Dynamics.

Authors:  Aleya Flechsenhar; Lara Rösler; Matthias Gamer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.