Literature DB >> 33828784

Looking (for) patterns: Similarities and differences between infant and adult free scene-viewing patterns.

Daan R van Renswoude1, Maartje E J Raijmakers2, Ingmar Visser1.   

Abstract

Systematic tendencies such as the center and horizontal bias are known to have a large influence on how and where we move our eyes during static onscreen free scene viewing. However, it is unknown whether these tendencies are learned viewing strategies or are more default tendencies in the way we move our eyes. To gain insight into the origin of these tendencies we explore the systematic tendencies of infants (3 - 20-month-olds, N = 157) and adults (N = 88) in three different scene viewing data sets. We replicated com-mon findings, such as longer fixation durations and shorter saccade amplitudes in infants compared to adults. The leftward bias was never studied in infants, and our results indi-cate that it is not present, while we did replicate the leftward bias in adults. The general pattern of the results highlights the similarity between infant and adult eye movements. Similar to adults, infants' fixation durations increase with viewing time and the depend-encies between successive fixations and saccades show very similar patterns. A straight-forward conclusion to draw from this set of studies is that infant and adult eye movements are mainly driven by similar underlying basic processes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambient and focal processing; Infant eye movements; Scene perception; Systematic tendencies; eye tracking; saccades; scan path

Year:  2020        PMID: 33828784      PMCID: PMC7881888          DOI: 10.16910/jemr.13.1.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eye Mov Res        ISSN: 1995-8692            Impact factor:   0.957


  46 in total

1.  Left face matching bias: right hemisphere dominance or scanning habits?

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya; Catriona Havard
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2011-01

2.  Visual correlates of fixation selection: effects of scale and time.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Roland J Baddeley; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Stable individual differences across images in human saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Monica S Castelhano; John M Henderson
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2008-03

4.  Saccadic model of eye movements for free-viewing condition.

Authors:  Olivier Le Meur; Zhi Liu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Do infants have the horizontal bias?

Authors:  D R Van Renswoude; S P Johnson; M E J Raijmakers; I Visser
Journal:  Infant Behav Dev       Date:  2016-06-07

6.  The development of implicit learning from infancy to adulthood: item frequencies, relations, and cognitive flexibility.

Authors:  Dima Amso; Juliet Davidow
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.038

7.  Leftward biases in picture scanning and line bisection: a gaze-contingent window study.

Authors:  Tom Foulsham; Alexander Gray; Eleni Nasiopoulos; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Infants' center bias in free viewing of real-world scenes.

Authors:  Daan R van Renswoude; Linda van den Berg; Maartje E J Raijmakers; Ingmar Visser
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Fixation durations in scene viewing: Modeling the effects of local image features, oculomotor parameters, and task.

Authors:  Antje Nuthmann
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

10.  Gazepath: An eye-tracking analysis tool that accounts for individual differences and data quality.

Authors:  Daan R van Renswoude; Maartje E J Raijmakers; Arnout Koornneef; Scott P Johnson; Sabine Hunnius; Ingmar Visser
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.