Literature DB >> 21258906

Does visual expertise improve visual recognition memory?

Karla K Evans1, Michael A Cohen, Rosemary Tambouret, Todd Horowitz, Erica Kreindel, Jeremy M Wolfe.   

Abstract

In general, humans have impressive recognition memory for previously viewed pictures. Many people spend years becoming experts in highly specialized image sets. For example, cytologists are experts at searching micrographs filled with potentially cancerous cells and radiologists are expert at searching mammograms for indications of cancer. Do these experts develop robust visual long-term memory for their domain of expertise? If so, is this expertise specific to the trained image class, or do such experts possess generally superior visual memory? We tested recognition memory of cytologists, radiologists, and controls with no medical experience for three visual stimulus classes: isolated objects, scenes, and mammograms or micrographs. Experts were better than control observers at recognizing images from their domain, but their memory for those images was not particularly good (D' ~ 1.0) and was much worse than memory for objects or scenes (D' > 2.0). Furthermore, experts were not better at recognizing scenes or isolated objects than control observers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21258906      PMCID: PMC3140200          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-010-0022-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  11 in total

1.  Hemispheric specialization and recognition memory for abstract and realistic pictures: a comparison of painters and laymen.

Authors:  Stine Vogt; Svein Magnussen
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Recognition memory for concrete, regular abstract, and diverse abstract pictures.

Authors:  Mathew W Bellhouse-King; Lionel G Standing
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2007-06

3.  Recall memory for visually presented chess positions.

Authors:  P W Frey; P Adesman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1976-09

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  Learning 10,000 pictures.

Authors:  L Standing
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Picture memory experiments.

Authors:  K Dallett; S G Wilcox; L D'Andrea
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-02

8.  "Memory effect" in observer performance studies of mammograms.

Authors:  Lara A Hardesty; Marie A Ganott; Christiane M Hakim; Cathy S Cohen; Ronald J Clearfield; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Expertise in pictorial perception: eye-movement patterns and visual memory in artists and laymen.

Authors:  Stine Vogt; Svein Magnussen
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  20 in total

1.  Radiologists remember mountains better than radiographs, or do they?

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Edith M Marom; Myrna C B Godoy; Diana Palacio; Tara Sagebiel; Sonia Betancourt Cuellar; Mark McEntee; Charles Tian; Patrick C Brennan; Tamara Miner Haygood
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-11-03

Review 2.  Informatics in radiology: what can you see in a single glance and how might this guide visual search in medical images?

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Karla Evans; Melissa L-H Võ; Francine L Jacobson; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Consistency of response and image recognition, pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  T M Haygood; M A Q Liu; E Galvan; R Bassett; W A Murphy; C S Ng; A Matamoros; E M Marom
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  The effect of expert knowledge on medical search: medical experts have specialized abilities for detecting serious lesions.

Authors:  Ryoichi Nakashima; Chisaki Watanabe; Eriko Maeda; Takeharu Yoshikawa; Izuru Matsuda; Soichiro Miki; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-10-01

5.  An expert advantage in detecting unfamiliar visual signals in noise.

Authors:  Zahra Hussain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Classification errors and response times over multiple distributed sessions as a function of category structure.

Authors:  Derek E Zeigler; Ronaldo Vigo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-10

7.  Gist processing in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Chia-Chien Wu; Nicholas M D'Ardenne; Robert M Nishikawa; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-12-18

8.  Modeling memory dynamics in visual expertise.

Authors:  Jeffrey Annis; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Internet-based measurement of visual assessment skill of trainee radiologists: developing a sensitive tool.

Authors:  Martin Thirkettle; Mandela Thyoka; Padmini Gopalan; Nadiah Fernandes; Tom Stafford; Amaka C Offiah
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  If you don't find it often, you often don't find it: why some cancers are missed in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Robyn L Birdwell; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.