S A Carp1, G P Dai, D A Boas, M A Franceschini, Y R Kim. 1. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
Abstract
Cerebral blood flow (CBF) during stepped hypercapnia was measured simultaneously in the rat brain using near-infrared diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) and arterial spin labeling MRI (ASL). DCS and ASL CBF values agree very well, with high correlation (R=0.86, p< 10(-9)), even when physiological instability perturbed the vascular response. A partial volume effect was evident in the smaller magnitude of the optical CBF response compared to the MRI values (averaged over the cortical area), primarily due to the inclusion of white matter in the optically sampled volume. The 8.2 and 11.7 mm mid-separation channels of the multi-distance optical probe had the lowest partial volume impact, reflecting ~75 % of the MR signal change. Using a multiplicative correction factor, the ASL CBF could be predicted with no more than 10% relative error, affording an opportunity for real-time relative cerebral metabolism monitoring in conjunction with MR measurement of cerebral blood volume using super paramagnetic contrast agents.
Cerebral blood flow (CBF) during stepped hypercapnia was measured simultaneously in the rat brain using near-infrared diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) and arterial spin labeling MRI (ASL). DCS and ASLCBF values agree very well, with high correlation (R=0.86, p< 10(-9)), even when physiological instability perturbed the vascular response. A partial volume effect was evident in the smaller magnitude of the optical CBF response compared to the MRI values (averaged over the cortical area), primarily due to the inclusion of white matter in the optically sampled volume. The 8.2 and 11.7 mm mid-separation channels of the multi-distance optical probe had the lowest partial volume impact, reflecting ~75 % of the MR signal change. Using a multiplicative correction factor, the ASLCBF could be predicted with no more than 10% relative error, affording an opportunity for real-time relative cerebral metabolism monitoring in conjunction with MR measurement of cerebral blood volume using super paramagnetic contrast agents.
The cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption (CMRO2) is a
physiological parameter closely linked to neural activation [1, 2], as well as to
various disease states [3-6]. A
key element necessary for CMRO2 monitoring is a measure of cerebral blood
flow (CBF). While bolus injection methods, using tracers such as radioactive [7] and fluorescent [8,9] microspheres have
proven quantitative accuracy, they only measure CBF at a few discrete timepoints. In
addition to these steady state CBF measurements, accurate assessment of dynamic CBF
changes with good temporal resolution provides a way to further understand
neurohemodynamic coupling and metabolic parameters. Currently, continuous CBF
monitoring can be achieved using Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) [10,11],
Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound (TCD) [12] or
MRI-based Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) [13,14]. However, TCD can only
give blood flow in large vessels, while LDF is an invasive technique requiring
opening of the scalp and skull for probe placement. On the other hand, ASL provides
an effective method for mapping CBF; however, the technique is lacking in temporal
resolution and sensitivity.Diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) [15-17], also known as Diffusing Wave Spectroscopy (DWS)
[18] is a novel method for non-invasive
CBF measurement at depth with excellent temporal resolution and sensitivity,
especially effective in rodents, piglets and neonates. DCS cerebral blood flow
measurements have been validated against LDF [19, 20], fluorescent microspheres
[21], Xenon-CT [22], TCD [23, 24] and MRI-ASL [25, 26]. Outside the
brain, DCS has also been validated against MRI-ASL for calf-muscle blood flow [27]. These encouraging results suggest DCS
could be used for continuous non-invasive CBF estimation, and may be integrated with
functional MRI methods for brain measurements.In this work, we validate DCS against ASL measurements of CBF in the rat-brain using
a graded hypercapnic challenge. We show strong linear correlation between DCS and
ASL measures of blood flow and demonstrate DCS can be used together with a partial
volume correction factor to recover the ASL data. We discuss the sources of the
partial volume effect and suggest ways to minimize its size. Thus, we provide
further proof of the feasibility of using DCS in conjunction with functional MRI in
the brain.We used a total of seven adult male Sprague Dawley rats (Charles River, MA, USA;
weight between 250 and 350 grams). Both left and right femoral veins (for
infusion of anesthetics and contrast agent administration, respectively) and
right femoral artery (for blood pressure monitoring and blood gas analysis) were
catheterized. Animals were initially anesthetized with 2.0% isoflurane in 100%
O2, then tracheotomized and mechanically ventilated with 1.5%
isoflurane in 70% N2O/30% O2 for the duration of surgery.
Body temperature was measured with a rectal probe. Before the optical/MRI
experiment, the anesthetic regimen was switched from the halothane gas mixture
used for surgery to continuous infusion of
α-chloralose (30 mg/kg/h), preceded by a loading
bolus (~20 mg/kg). Concurrently with α-chloralose
administration, rats were paralyzed with an intravenous bolus of pancuronium (1
mg/kg), which was followed by continuous infusion (~ 1.25 mg/kg/h) of
pancuronium. Body temperature, blood oxygen saturation level, heart rate and
blood pressure were monitored and carefully maintained at normal levels
throughout the experiment. A temperature-controlled water blanket was placed
under the rat’s torso to maintain body temperature at 37.0
°C. A sufficient time was allowed for the anesthetic transition
before the optical/MRI measurements. Blood gases (pO2 and
pCO2) as well as pH were verified to be within normal ranges before
the animal was inserted in the scanner cavity. Blood gas monitoring did not
continue during the scans due to concerns over the need to use a lengthy
(>1.5m) arterial sampling line as well as a lack of manpower to take
and process samples while operating the optical and MR equipment. An additional
two rats were later used as a control set using the same animal preparation
procedure up through and including placing the rat in the scanner bore. However,
we did not run the scanner or the optical measurement, thus being able to access
the rat inside the scanner cage and allowing for a short (0.3 m) arterial line.
Average blood gas values from these animals were used to estimate CO2
reactivity in the main group under the assumption of similar behavior between
the two sets.The animals were mechanically ventilated at all times. The hypercapnic challenge
involved exposure to a premixed gas consisting of 2.5, 5 or 7.5% CO2
and 92.5, 95, 97.5% air, respectively. Each trial involved a 5 minutes baseline
(100% air), 15 minutes stepped hypercapnia (5 minutes each at 2.5, 5, and 7.5%
CO2, respectively), followed by a 5 minute return to baseline.
Each trial was repeated twice for each animal. Optical and MR acquisitions were
continuously performed during the entire length of both trials.We constructed a diffuse correlation spectrometer (DCS) system similar to the one
developed by the Yodh group at Univ. of Pennsylvania [25]. A solid-state long coherence length laser at 785 nm
(CrystaLaser RCL-785-080-S) was coupled to a 62.5μm
multi-mode gradient index fiber and delivered to the tissue. The diffusely
reflected light was collected by four single-mode optical fibers and detected by
four photon-counting avalanche photodiodes (PC-APD, Perkin Elmer
SPCM-AQR-14-FC). The intensity auto correlation function of each channel was
computed by a digital correlator (Correlator.com Flex32-8ch) over a delay time
range of 200 ns - 0.5 s. A correlation curve was acquired approx. 1.5 times per
second. To improve the accuracy of the blood flow estimation the optical
properties of the tissue were measured at the same time using a frequency domain
near infrared spectrometer (FD-NIRS ) [28, 29] using one source and four
detector fiber bundles co-located with the DCS fibers, as described in section
§2.4. The multi-distance FD-NIRS measurement was used to quantify the
scattering and absorption coefficients by fitting said measurements to the
standard diffusion approximation model for light transport in a semi-infinite
turbid medium. The instruments operated in a time-interleaved fashion, where in
each 15 second time interval, DCS data was acquired for 9 seconds at 1.5 Hz,
followed by FD-NIRS data acquired for 6 seconds at 12.5 Hz.MRI measurements were performed using a horizontal bore 9.4 T Bruker/Magnex
system, equipped with a home-built rat head surface RF transmitter and receiver
coil, approximately 30 mm in diameter. A surface coil was used for brain imaging
and a neck coil for perfusion labeling. Coil-to-coil electromagnetic interaction
was actively decoupled. Simultaneous BOLD and CBF measurements were made using
the two-coil continuous arterial spin-labeling method with single-shot, GE
(TR/TE=3700/13 ms) echo planar imaging (EPI) acquisition (three 1 mm slices with
inter-slice separation of 1 mm, FOV=2.3×2.3 cm2,
64×64 matrix). Paired images were acquired alternately with and
without arterial spin labeling.A combined optical probe/MR coil assembly was fabricated to fit in the animal
holder tube of the Bruker MRI system (Fig.
1). A plastic stereotactic frame held the animal’s head fixed
during the experiment. Both optical systems delivered and collected light
through co-located source and detector fibers at 5.3, 8.2, 11.7 and 15.5 mm
source-detector separations. The optical probe made of thermoplastic material is
rigidly attached with two screws to the MR coil, thus giving reliable
positioning of the optical fibers in the MR field of view. The acquisition start
time was recorded to the second for all three instruments (DCS, FD-NIRS, MRI) as
well as the gas change timing. It is expected that an approximately 30 second
delay occurs before the gas change reaches the animal due to the length of the
breathing gas lines.
Fig. 1.
Multi-modality probe design. a) Photograph of MRI head coil and
optical probe assembly on a rat, ready to be inserted into the
scanner bore; a separate ASL labeling coil is placed under the neck
area. b) Schematic of optical probe, with fibers connected to both
the FD-NIRS and the DCS system inserted at each location. Source
position is shown in red, while detector positions are in blue, with
source-detector separations of 5.3, 8.2, 11.7, and 15.5 mm,
respectively
Four animals were used in the data analysis. Data from the other three could not
be used because of hardware problems that resulted in poor labeling coil
performance and subsequent low quality ASL images.The diffusion correlation equation offers the theoretical framework for
analyzing the DCS data. As detailed by Boas et al. [15, 16] and
further validated by Cheung et al., Culver et al. and Durduran et al. [19,20, 25], the normalized
intensity temporal auto-correlation function,
g2(τ) is given
by:Multi-modality probe design. a) Photograph of MRI head coil and
optical probe assembly on a rat, ready to be inserted into the
scanner bore; a separate ASL labeling coil is placed under the neck
area. b) Schematic of optical probe, with fibers connected to both
the FD-NIRS and the DCS system inserted at each location. Source
position is shown in red, while detector positions are in blue, with
source-detector separations of 5.3, 8.2, 11.7, and 15.5 mm,
respectivelywhere β is the coherence factor,
r and r are
the source and detector positions, respectively,
τ is the correlation time,
μ′ is
the reduced scattering coefficient,
μ is the absorption coefficient,
k0 is the wavenumber for the laser light,
PRBC is the probability of scattering from a
moving scatterer (most likely a red blood cell), and <
Δr2(τ)
> is the mean square displacement of the moving scattering
particles. Several studies [19,25] have shown that DCS correlation
profiles from living tissues can be fit well by assuming particle
displacement follows Brownian motion dynamics:where D is the Brownian diffusion coefficient.
Since PRBC is generally unknown, it is grouped
together with D to form a blood flow index as
CBFDCS = DRBC. To
obtain the time-course of CBFDCS we first recover the absorption
and scattering optical properties from the FD-NIRS instrument. These are
then interpolated across the DCS timepoints and used in fitting Eqs. (1), (2) to the experimental
measurements for each DCS source-detector pair individually.CBF maps have been created by subtracting tagged images from their untagged
counterparts for each slice, resulting in a frame rate of one image every
7.4 seconds. Regions of interest were defined in the cortex in an area 2 mm
wide under the location of the optical fibers. Because baseline blood flow
was close to the system noise level, temporal traces were normalized to the
average of the second half of the first 2.5% CO2 period.The level of correlation of normalized time courses obtained from the two
modalities was quantified using the Pearson product-moment correlation
coefficient. Further, we calibrated the optical partial volume effect size
over the entire measurement set, and estimated the accuracy in recovering
ASLCBF measures from the DCS data.ASL slice showing optical fiber locations (blue) and region-of-interest
for averaging of MRI CBF (magenta)Figure 2 shows a time-average of the
middle ASL slice in one of the animals. The region of interest (ROI) used to
obtain the MRI data is shown as a magenta rectangular overlay, while the
location of the line of optical fibers is indicated using a blue filled
rectangle above the MRI ROI. Figure 3
displays the average CO2 response from N=4 stepped hypercapnia
periods collected from multiple rats. Both MRI-ASL and DCS are included, and
separate time-courses are plotted for each of the DCS channels (error bars
represent standard errors). Values plotted are normalized to the average of the 2 half of the 2.5% CO2hypercapnia period, since the MRI-ASL
data of that segment had the lowest standard deviation. A progressive increase
in cerebral blood flow is noted for both measurement methods, as expected. The
DCSCBF increase is lower compared to the ASLCBF, with the smallest increase
displayed by the most superficially sensitive channel and very similar
time-courses observed for the other three larger separation channels, with a
small decrease at the largest separation. A summary of the observed relative CBF
values is given in Table 1 (data
averaged over the 2 half of each CO2 level). The variations in optical
absorption and scattering are much smaller than the increase in blood flow.
Fig. 2.
ASL slice showing optical fiber locations (blue) and region-of-interest
for averaging of MRI CBF (magenta)
Fig. 3.
Average normalized CBF time course for N=4 hypercapnia periods, from both
ASL (black) and the 4 optical channels with 5.3 (blue), 8.2 (red), 11.7
(green) and 15.5 (magenta) mm separations, respectively; vertical bars
indicate gas changes from 0→2.5 %
CO2,2.5→5% CO2, 5→7.5%
CO2 and 7.5→0% CO2
Table 1.
Average relative CBF during stepped hypercapnia. Averages taken over the
second half of each hypercania period. Baseline value for MRI-ASL is
italicized to indicate lower confidence because of the lower SNR of the
corresponding raw data.
CO2
level
0%
2.5%
5%
7.5%
DCS Ch.1 (5.3 mm)
72%
100%
118%
133%
DCS Ch.2 (8.2 mm)
71%
100%
124%
154%
DCS Ch.3 (11.7 mm)
75%
100%
124%
155%
DCS Ch.4 (15.5 mm)
78%
100%
122%
150%
MRI-ASL
68%
100%
150%
224%
Average normalized CBF time course for N=4 hypercapnia periods, from both
ASL (black) and the 4 optical channels with 5.3 (blue), 8.2 (red), 11.7
(green) and 15.5 (magenta) mm separations, respectively; vertical bars
indicate gas changes from 0→2.5 %
CO2,2.5→5% CO2, 5→7.5%
CO2 and 7.5→0% CO2The average changes with respect to the 0% CO2 baseline at
λ =785 nm are -0.76 ± 0.07%, 0.63
± 0.64% and 2.41 ± 1.16%, respectively for
μ, and 1.23 ± 0.07%,
2.41 ± 0.14% and 3.40 ±0.16%, respectively for
μs′ at 2.5%, 5% and 7.5%
inspired CO2 volume fraction.Average relative CBF during stepped hypercapnia. Averages taken over the
second half of each hypercania period. Baseline value for MRI-ASL is
italicized to indicate lower confidence because of the lower SNR of the
corresponding raw data.While blood gases were not available for the animals reported in Table 1, the average pCO2
values in the two animal control set were 38.2±4.2 mmHg,
43.2±4.7 mmHg, 54±6.3 mmHg, and 68.5±6.3 mmHg
(mean ± stdev) for baseline, 2.5%, 5% and 7.5% CO2 respectively
(average of 3 stepped hypercapnia trials on each rat). Making the assumption
that these animals behaved similarly to the ones used as the main group, the
CO2 reactivity appears to be 3.74% /mmHg pCO2 from the
DCS data (average of ch.2 and 3) and 4.91% /mmHg pCO2 for the ASL
data.DCS-ASL correlation scatter plot.Figure 4 shows a scatter plot of relative
CBF values measured with MRI-ASL and DCS during a representative stepped
hypercapnia experiment, using the same normalization reference as the previous
section. The DCS data represents an average of the two mid-separation DCS
channels, which show the highest relative amount of response to hypercapnia.
There is good linear agreement between the two methods, with a correlation
coefficient R=0.86, and probability of no-correlation p<
10-9. Table 2 summarizes
the ratios between the fractional rCBF changes measured with DCS versus those
measured with MRI-ASL. These ratios are calculated between 2.5% and 5%
CO2 and between 2.5% and 7.5% CO2 levels, respectively and
averaged over the same 4 stepped hypercapnia experiments used to generate Fig. 3. Note that, as shown in Table 2, DCS appears to always
underestimate the ASLCBF change, more so at higher CBF values. The two
mid-separation DCS channels (with inter-fiber distances of 8.2 and 11.7 mm
respectively) reflect the ASL measurement best, with an average correction
coefficient of 1.33 (i.e.
rCBFASL/〉rCBFDCS〈=1.33).
Finally, Table 3 gives the relative
error encountered when using the the above correction coefficient to predict the
ASL measured flow change from the mid-separation DCS data. Note that over the
range of cerebral blood flows resulting from 2.5% to 7.5% hypercapnia,
calibrated DCS measurements can predict MRI ASLrCBF values with no more than
±10% relative error.
Fig. 4.
DCS-ASL correlation scatter plot.
Table 2.
Percent of MRI relative CBF change reflected by the DCS relative CBF
change. Values less than 100% denote rCBFDCS underestimates
rCBFASL
CO2 level
DCS Ch.1
DCS Ch.2
DCS Ch.3
DCS Ch.4
5%
+79%
+83%
+83%
+81%
7.5%
+59%
+69%
+69%
+67%
Table 3.
Error in predicting rCBF (normalized to CBF during the second half of the
2.5% CO2 period)
CO2
level
2.5%
5%
7.5%
Prediction
Rel. Err.
Prediction
Rel. Err.
Prediction
Rel. Err.
DCS Ch.2
100%
N/A
165%
9.93%
205%
-8.58%
DCS Ch.3
100%
N/A
165%
9.93%
206%
-7.98%
MRI-ASL
100%
N/A
150%
N/A
224%
N/A
Percent of MRI relative CBF change reflected by the DCS relative CBF
change. Values less than 100% denote rCBFDCS underestimates
rCBFASLError in predicting rCBF (normalized to CBF during the second half of the
2.5% CO2 period)CBF measurement during physiological instability. a) CBF time course from
DCS (blue) and ASL (red) data; b) ASL vs DCS correlation plotFigure 5 shows the relative CBF traces
from ASL and the average of the mid-separation DCS channels (Ch. 2 and Ch. 3)
during a stepped hypercapnia experiment affected by physiological instability.
Specifically, the rat experienced a cortical spreading depression (CSD) wave
evident in the full-frame time-resolved blood flow MR images (not shown). The
temporal features of the two methods remain well aligned, while the scatter plot
again indicates strong correlation, despite the CSD episode.
Fig. 5.
CBF measurement during physiological instability. a) CBF time course from
DCS (blue) and ASL (red) data; b) ASL vs DCS correlation plot
4. Discussion
Cerebral blood flow measurements are an essential component of cerebral oxygen
metabolism monitoring. Diffuse correlation spectroscopy is the first optical method
with the ability to quantify blood flow in thick tissue without the need for a
contrast agent. Substantial effort has been expended to validate DCS [19-27] including previous validation
against MRI ASL for calf muscle blood flow [27], cortical motor activation [25]
and cerebral blood flow in neonates [26].This study further validates DCS against ASL in the multi-layered environment of the
intact rat brain. The DCS optical measure of blood flow, represented by the product
DRBC exhibits good linear
correlation with ASL data averaged over the field of view of the optical probe. This
correlation is maintained even in the presence of physiological instability,
suggesting a link between the optical and MR flow measures at a fundamental level,
as expected. While the linear relationship between rCBFDCS and
rCBFASL allows a simple multiplicative correction factor to be used
to recover ASL variation values from DCS data, with good results as shown above, the
significant underestimation of ASLCBF by DCS warrants further analysis.There are two main possible sources of discrepancy - partial volume effects
contaminating the cortical DCS signal and differences in the nature of the flow
measurement between DCS and ASL. While analysis driven by segmented MRI structural
images is beyond the scope of the current article, to further understand the
magnitute of potential partial volume effects we might have encountered, we
performed a set of Monte Carlo simulations on a flat layered geometry that mimicked
the rat head. We used morphological data from the Paxinos and Watson rat brain atlas
[30], the same probe fiber locations used
for the hypercapnia experiments, a standard set of brain optical properties [31], and estimates of brownian diffusion
coefficient for scalp and cortex from Li et al. [18]. Further we assumed that cortical blood flow doubles due to hypercapnic
stimulation, while white matter has half of both the baseline perfusion and the
CO2 reactivity of the gray matter [32-34]. We employed the Monte Carlo code developed by Boas et
al. [35]due to its ability to handle
heterogeneous optical properties with a modification to additionally report momentum
transfer accumulation along a photon path [36,37]. The simulated correlation
decay profiles were then fitted using the same approach outlined in
§2.5.1. From these simulations we found that all optical detectors
collect photons that have sampled a significant amount of white matter with the
proportion of white matter pathlength varying between 40% (Ch.1) to 70% (Ch.4).
Further, scalp and skull account for 10–20% of the photon pathlenghts,
leading to a 2% (Ch. 4) to 7% (Ch. 1) underestimation of cerebral blood flow.
Finally, the only way to explain a significantly lower flow variation in the
shortest source-detector separation as seen in our experimental data is to assume an
air gap between the probe and the scalp of the rat. Such a 1–2 mm air gap
likely occured due to the weight of the optical fibers bending the probe as the rat
tube was inserted into the MR bore. Aside from the probable presence of the air gap,
the main conclusions from the Monte Carlo simulations are that the most significant
partial volume effect is due to the inclusion of a substantial amount of white
matter in the photon migration path, while the skin and skull partial volume effect,
even though present, has a minor impact. The influence of lower white matter
baseline blood flow and CO2 reactivity helps explain three important
features of our results: a lower CBF increase seen by DCS compared to the cortically
averaged MR ASL blood flow, a slightly reduced CBF response to CO2
observed at the largest source-detector separation (Ch. 4) which is affected by the
largest white matter partial volume effect, and the increasing discrepancy vs. ASL
at 7.5% CO2 compared to the 5% CO2 level that likely results
from the further increased perfusion contrast between the cortex and white matter at
high inspired CO2 concentration. The reduced CBF reponse at larger fiber
separations has also been observed in the rat brain by Cheung et al. [19] for a 9 mm source-detector separation. Many
of these caveats are related to the probe design and can be alleviated for future
rat experiments by improving the rigidity of the probe and by reducing source
detector separations. Note that we chose a fairly large probe fiber spacing to be
able to maintain the accuracy of the diffusion approximation model used for FD-NIRS
data analysis. However, Monte Carlo simulations and/or finite element methods could
be used to relax this requirement and maintain accurate optical property recovery at
short source detector distances.Although the ability to explain many features of our results by using Monte Carlo
simulations in a layered geometry is encouraging, these simulations predict at most
a 15% reduction in measured DCSCBF vs. actual cortical blood flow for our probe
fiber spacing in a typical rat, less than the 25% underestimation observed vs
ASL-MRI. Further, the overall 0–7.5% CO2 transition was
accompanied by an average DCSCBF increase to 212% of the baseline, higher than the
177% level reported by Cheung et al. [19] and
Culver et al. [38] for a similar carbon
dioxide level (8%), and the estimated 3.74% per mmHg pCO2 reactivity is
at the upper end of literature values which range between 2% and 4% per mmHg
pCO2 [39-41] (with
the caveat that it was calculated using two different sets of animals). Finally,
whereas Kim et al. [22] validated DCSCBF
measurements against Xenon CT in an adult population noting only a 10%
proportionality mismatch, Durduran et al. [26] presented DCSCBF validation data against MRI ASL in a neonatal
population where the MRI ASL relative changes were 1.3 times bigger than the DCS
relative CBF increase (as shown in Fig. 5 of
the cited reference). Considering the totality of these observations - on one hand
significant underestimation of ASLCBF measures by DCS, and the good agreement of
DCSCBF with Xenon CT as well as literature CO2 reactivity on the other
hand - suggests there are perhaps structural differences in the way DCS and MRI-ASL
measure tissue perfusion, related to their different mechanisms of sensitivity to
flow. For example the ASL data may be affected by a perfusion related reduction in
transit time, as well as hypercapnia induced blood oxygenation changes that modify
local T2* and thus image intensity [42]. Another potential source of error in the DCSCBF estimate relates to
the way contributions from blood volume and blood flow velocity are reflected in the
PRD quantity used as a blood flow index. CBF
changes are the product of vessel cross-sectional area changes (linearly related to
PR under the assumption of
constant length of the vessel network) and flow velocity changes (reflected by
D). Since D is
representative of root mean square displacement of scatterers in the blood, and not
of their linear movement, it can be argued that the
PRD
product underestimates the impact of blood volume changes by a factor of
thus further explaining the underestimation of ASLCBF by the DCS
method.Combined DCS and FD-NIRS measurements can be used to estimate changes in cerebral
metabolism using Fick’s law, which is often expressed as
rCMRO2=rOEF.rCBF, where OEF is the oxygen extraction fraction, equal to
the difference between the blood oxygen saturation on the arterial vs. venous side
of a tissue region, and the prefix “r” stands for relative
change. The use of a compartmental model that assumes the measured tissue hemoglobin
oxygen saturation is a mixture of arterial, capillary and venous blood [19,43]
in conjunction with DCS and NIRS data not corrected for partial volume effects has
been met with success in several studies where CMRO2 changes occur on a
larger spatial scale, such as hypercapnia [19, 26], ischemia [20], or early brain development [23]. On the other hand, where metabolic changes
are highly localized, such as during cerebral functional activation partial volume
correction of the optical data appears necessary to obtain accurate CMRO2
data [25].The goal of the current publication is to suggest that DCS calibration against
MRI-ASL can enable multi-modal MRI-optical continuous CMRO2 monitoring
during brain functional experiments, with potential improved relative metabolism
quantification accuracy compared to current methods. The ability of the ASL
technique to obtain fairly detailed perfusion images permits the calibration of the
DCS flow measurement for a specific tissue volume that matches the area where
functional activation occurs. Specifically, a stepped hypercapnia challenge can be
performed at the beginning of the experimental protocol, leading to a set of
correction coefficients that can convert DCS measurements into corresponding ASL
blood flow changes for any particular cerebral region of interest. Then, the
standard protocol for MR imaging of CMRO2 can be followed, usually
requiring the injection of a contrast agent for the determination of the cerebral
blood volume. The DCS data can then be directly substituted for relative flow in the
rCMRO2 calculation, instead of using an assumed blood-volume
blood-flow relationship such as the Grubb power law [44], which may result in significant errors in the assumed flow changes
[45, 46]. A further advantage of using DCS for CBF quantification is the high
temporal resolution of the optical methods, combined with good SNR for measurements
at baseline flow rates. This is due to the fact that auto-correlation decay due to
baseline flow is still much faster than the decay due to any other source of
biological or environmental fluctuation (DCS measurements taken post mortem show a
correlation decay 3–4 orders of magnitude slower than before the animal
is sacrificed).
5. Conclusion
We have demonstrated a strong linear relationship between diffuse correlation
spectroscopy and MRI arterial spin labeling estimates of cerebral blood flow in the
rat brain. While DCS measures underestimate the ASL changes, a multiplicative
correction factor can be used to predict MRI flow changes from the DCS data. We
propose that using stepped hypercapnia for DCS-ASL flow calibration can be used to
enable multi-modal optical-MRI cerebral metabolism monitoring with improved accuracy
vs. current methodology due to simultaneous blood flow and blood volume
quantification as well as improved flow measurement noise, especially near baseline
values.
Authors: V L Babikian; E Feldmann; L R Wechsler; D W Newell; C R Gomez; U Bogdahn; L R Caplan; M P Spencer; C Tegeler; E B Ringelstein; A V Alexandrov Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Nadège Roche-Labarbe; Stefan A Carp; Andrea Surova; Megha Patel; David A Boas; P Ellen Grant; Maria Angela Franceschini Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Jie Lu; Guangping Dai; Yasu Egi; Shuning Huang; Seon Joo Kwon; Eng H Lo; Young Ro Kim Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-12-14 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Meeri N Kim; Brian L Edlow; Turgut Durduran; Suzanne Frangos; Rickson C Mesquita; Joshua M Levine; Joel H Greenberg; Arjun G Yodh; John A Detre Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: David R Busch; Ramani Balu; Wesley B Baker; Wensheng Guo; Lian He; Mamadou Diop; Daniel Milej; Venkaiah Kavuri; Olivia Amendolia; Keith St Lawrence; Arjun G Yodh; W Andrew Kofke Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: David R Busch; Regine Choe; Turgut Durduran; Daniel H Friedman; Wesley B Baker; Andrew D Maidment; Mark A Rosen; Mitchell D Schnall; Arjun G Yodh Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: David R Busch; Craig G Rusin; Wanda Miller-Hance; Kathy Kibler; Wesley B Baker; Jeffrey S Heinle; Charles D Fraser; Arjun G Yodh; Daniel J Licht; Kenneth M Brady Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2016-08-15 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Songfeng Han; Ashley R Proctor; Joseph B Vella; Danielle S W Benoit; Regine Choe Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2016-08-09 Impact factor: 3.732