Literature DB >> 21257996

Quality control in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: detection rates of gastric cancer in Oxford 2005-2008.

S Vradelis1, N Maynard, B F Warren, S Keshav, S P L Travis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) represents the sum of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) and early gastric cancer (EGC). Endoscopy (with biopsies) is the gold standard for detection of GC, but a false-negative rate of up to 19% is reported. AIM: To determine whether patients with GC had had an oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) in the year preceding diagnosis that might reasonably have been expected to detect the cancer, as a measure of quality assurance of endoscopic practice.
METHODS: Patients with histologically proven GC were identified from pathology records. Endoscopy reports and case notes were examined to identify any OGD before diagnosis, the interval and endoscopic findings. A false-negative OGD was defined as one where GC was neither suspected nor shown at pathology, but where a diagnosis of GC was made within 12 months.
RESULTS: Between January 2005 and February 2008, 9764 OGDs were performed. GC was diagnosed in 74 patients (male/female ratio 2.89; median age 76, range 38-95). Nine (12%) patients had EGC. There were no differences in age, sex or symptoms between the EGC and AGC group. Sixty-eight of the 74 patients with GC (92%) presented with alarm symptoms. Ten of the 74 had had an OGD within 12 months before definitive diagnosis; all these were planned because of suspicious lesions. Significantly fewer biopsies were performed at OGDs preceding definitive diagnosis (median 2 (0-10) vs 6 (2-12); p=0.002).
CONCLUSION: False-negative rates of 0% (within 12 months) and 8% (within 3 years) for diagnosis of GC are reassuring, but an inadequate number of biopsies compromises the quality assurance of endoscopy. GC presents without alarm symptoms in <10%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21257996     DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.2010.101832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  15 in total

1.  Symptom-histopathology relation in upper GI endoscopy.

Authors:  Emre Günay; Erkan Özkan; Hacı Mehmet Odabaşı; Hacı Hasan Abuoğlu; Cengiz Eriş; Mehmet Kamil Yıldız; Süleyman Atalay
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2013-09-01

2.  Endoscopic quality indicators for esophagogastroduodenoscopy in gastric cancer screening.

Authors:  Chan Hyuk Park; Bun Kim; Hyunsoo Chung; Hyuk Lee; Jun Chul Park; Sung Kwan Shin; Sang Kil Lee; Yong Chan Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Improving quality in endoscopy: are we nearly there yet?

Authors:  Andy Veitch; Matt Rutter
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-13

4.  Factors Associated with Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Occurrence After Endoscopy that Did Not Diagnose Cancer.

Authors:  Danny Cheung; Shyam Menon; Jonathan Hoare; Anjan Dhar; Nigel Trudgill
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Optimizing early upper gastrointestinal cancer detection at endoscopy.

Authors:  Andrew M Veitch; Noriya Uedo; Kenshi Yao; James E East
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 46.802

6.  Rates and Risk Factors for Interval Gastric Cancers at Screening Gastroscopy.

Authors:  Jin Hwa Park; Kang Nyeong Lee; Hang Lak Lee; Dae Won Jun; Jai Hoon Yoon; Oh Young Lee; Byung Chul Yoon; Ho Soon Choi
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  How commonly is upper gastrointestinal cancer missed at endoscopy? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shyam Menon; Nigel Trudgill
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2014-05-07

Review 8.  How to Improve the Quality of Screening Endoscopy in Korea: National Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Yu Kyung Cho
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2016-07-29

9.  Factors associated with oesophagogastric cancers missed by gastroscopy: a case-control study.

Authors:  Foong Way David Tai; Nicholas Wray; Reena Sidhu; Andrew Hopper; Mark McAlindon
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-07-11

10.  The optimal screening interval for gastric cancer using esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy in Japan.

Authors:  Daiki Kobayashi; Osamu Takahashi; Hiroko Arioka; Tsuguya Fukui
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.