Literature DB >> 21257744

Proposed modification to the inhalable aerosol convention applicable to realistic workplace wind speeds.

Darrah K Sleeth1, James H Vincent.   

Abstract

The current convention for sampling inhalable aerosols was based on several mannequin studies performed in wind tunnels at wind speeds between 0.5 and 4 m s(-1). In reality, as we now know, the wind speed in most modern indoor working environments is generally at or below ∼0.2 m s(-1). Inhalability studies performed in calm air aerosol chambers have shown that human aspiration efficiency at essentially zero wind speed is not consistent with the existing inhalable aerosol convention, calling into question the universal applicability of the current standard. More recently, experiments were carried out in a new hybrid wind tunnel-calm air chamber at more representative workplace wind speeds, between ∼0.1 and 0.5 m s(-1), to fill in this knowledge gap. Comparing these new data to both the existing inhalable aerosol convention and a recently proposed alternative for low wind movement suggests that, while the existing inhalable aerosol convention remains appropriate for wind speeds above ∼0.2 m s(-1), the modified version is more appropriate for the range below ∼0.2 m s(-1).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21257744     DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/meq100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  5 in total

1.  Sampling efficiency of modified 37-mm sampling cassettes using computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  T Renée Anthony; Darrah Sleeth; John Volckens
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Computational fluid dynamics investigation of human aspiration in low-velocity air: orientation effects on mouth-breathing simulations.

Authors:  T Renée Anthony; Kimberly R Anderson
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2013-01-12

3.  Computational fluid dynamics investigation of human aspiration in low velocity air: orientation effects on nose-breathing simulations.

Authors:  Kimberly R Anderson; T Renée Anthony
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2014-03-24

4.  An empirical model of human aspiration in low-velocity air using CFD investigations.

Authors:  T Renée Anthony; Kimberly R Anderson
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Influence of secondary aspiration on human aspiration efficiency.

Authors:  K R Anderson; T Renee Anthony
Journal:  J Aerosol Sci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.433

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.