Literature DB >> 21257369

Real-time adaptive microstimulation increases reliability of electrically evoked cortical potentials.

Dominik Brugger1, Sergejus Butovas, Martin Bogdan, Cornelius Schwarz.   

Abstract

Cortical neuroprostheses that employ repeated electrical stimulation of cortical areas with fixed stimulus parameters, are faced with the problem of large trial-by-trial variability of evoked potentials. This variability is caused by the ongoing cortical signal processing, but it is an unwanted phenomenon if one aims at imprinting neural activity as precisely as possible. Here, we use local field potentials measured by one microelectrode, located at a distance of 200 microns from the stimulation site, to drive the electrically evoked potential toward a desired target potential by real-time adaptation of the stimulus intensity. The functional relationship between ongoing cortical activity, evoked potential, and stimulus intensity was estimated by standard machine learning techniques (support vector regression with problem-specific kernel function) from a set of stimulation trials with randomly varied stimulus intensities. The smallest deviation from the target potential was achieved for low stimulus intensities. Further, the observed precision effect proved time sensitive, since it was abolished by introducing a delay between data acquisition and stimulation. These results indicate that local field potentials contain sufficient information about ongoing local signal processing to stabilize electrically evoked potentials. We anticipate that adaptive low intensity microstimulation will play an important role in future cortical prosthetic devices that aim at restoring lost sensory functions.
© 2011 IEEE

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21257369     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2011.2107512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  9 in total

Review 1.  Implantable neurotechnologies: electrical stimulation and applications.

Authors:  Sudip Nag; Nitish V Thakor
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Sensory percepts induced by microwire array and DBS microstimulation in human sensory thalamus.

Authors:  Brandon D Swan; Lynne B Gasperson; Max O Krucoff; Warren M Grill; Dennis A Turner
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  System identification of the nonlinear dynamics in the thalamocortical circuit in response to patterned thalamic microstimulation in vivo.

Authors:  Daniel C Millard; Qi Wang; Clare A Gollnick; Garrett B Stanley
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Estimation of diffusion coefficients from voltammetric signals by support vector and gaussian process regression.

Authors:  Martin Bogdan; Dominik Brugger; Wolfgang Rosenstiel; Bernd Speiser
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.514

5.  State-Dependent Decoding Algorithms Improve the Performance of a Bidirectional BMI in Anesthetized Rats.

Authors:  Vito De Feo; Fabio Boi; Houman Safaai; Arno Onken; Stefano Panzeri; Alessandro Vato
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  State-aware detection of sensory stimuli in the cortex of the awake mouse.

Authors:  Audrey J Sederberg; Aurélie Pala; He J V Zheng; Biyu J He; Garrett B Stanley
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Local Neuronal Responses to Intracortical Microstimulation in Rats' Barrel Cortex Are Dependent on Behavioral Context.

Authors:  Sergejus Butovas; Cornelius Schwarz
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  A tensor-product-kernel framework for multiscale neural activity decoding and control.

Authors:  Lin Li; Austin J Brockmeier; John S Choi; Joseph T Francis; Justin C Sanchez; José C Príncipe
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-14

9.  Implications of the Dependence of Neuronal Activity on Neural Network States for the Design of Brain-Machine Interfaces.

Authors:  Stefano Panzeri; Houman Safaai; Vito De Feo; Alessandro Vato
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.