Literature DB >> 21257070

Evidence of biases in genetic evaluations due to genomic preselection in dairy cattle.

C Patry1, V Ducrocq.   

Abstract

A genomic preselection step of young sires is now often included in dairy cattle breeding schemes. Young sires are selected based on their genomic breeding values. They have better Mendelian sampling contribution so that the assumption of random Mendelian sampling term in genetic evaluations is clearly violated. When these sires and their progeny are evaluated using BLUP, it is feared that estimated breeding values are biased. The effect of genomic selection on genetic evaluations was studied through simulations keeping the structure of the Holstein population in France. The quality of genetic evaluations was assessed by computing bias and accuracy from the difference and correlation between true and estimated breeding values, respectively, and also the mean square error of prediction. Different levels of heritability, selection intensity, and accuracy of genomic evaluation were tested. After only one generation and whatever the scenario, breeding values of preselected young sires and their daughters were significantly underestimated and their accuracy was decreased. Genomic preselection needs to be accounted for in genetic evaluation models. Copyright Â
© 2011 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21257070     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  16 in total

Review 1.  Genomic prediction in animals and plants: simulation of data, validation, reporting, and benchmarking.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Mario P L Calus; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Gustavo de Los Campos; John M Hickey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genomic prediction of breeding values using previously estimated SNP variances.

Authors:  Mario Pl Calus; Chris Schrooten; Roel F Veerkamp
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  Impact and utility of shallow pedigree using single-step genomic BLUP for prediction of unbiased genomic breeding values.

Authors:  G R Gowane; Rani Alex; Anupama Mukherjee; Vikas Vohra
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 1.893

4.  Impact of genomic preselection on subsequent genetic evaluations with ssGBLUP using real data from pigs.

Authors:  Ibrahim Jibrila; Jeremie Vandenplas; Jan Ten Napel; Rob Bergsma; Roel F Veerkamp; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 5.100

5.  Accounting for genomic pre-selection in national BLUP evaluations in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Clotilde Patry; Vincent Ducrocq
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Single-step genomic evaluation of Russian dairy cattle using internal and external information.

Authors:  Andrei A Kudinov; Esa A Mäntysaari; Timo J Pitkänen; Ekaterina I Saksa; Gert P Aamand; Pekka Uimari; Ismo Strandén
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 3.271

7.  Investigating the impact of preselection on subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluation of preselected animals.

Authors:  Ibrahim Jibrila; Jan Ten Napel; Jeremie Vandenplas; Roel F Veerkamp; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  Systematic genotyping of groups of cows to improve genomic estimated breeding values of selection candidates.

Authors:  Laura Plieschke; Christian Edel; Eduardo C G Pimentel; Reiner Emmerling; Jörn Bennewitz; Kay-Uwe Götz
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.297

Review 9.  Single-Step Genomic Evaluations from Theory to Practice: Using SNP Chips and Sequence Data in BLUPF90.

Authors:  Daniela Lourenco; Andres Legarra; Shogo Tsuruta; Yutaka Masuda; Ignacio Aguilar; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Bias and accuracy of dairy sheep evaluations using BLUP and SSGBLUP with metafounders and unknown parent groups.

Authors:  Fernando L Macedo; Ole F Christensen; Jean-Michel Astruc; Ignacio Aguilar; Yutaka Masuda; Andrés Legarra
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.