Literature DB >> 36210357

Impact and utility of shallow pedigree using single-step genomic BLUP for prediction of unbiased genomic breeding values.

G R Gowane1, Rani Alex1, Anupama Mukherjee1, Vikas Vohra2.   

Abstract

In unstructured dairy programs, pedigree is usually shallow, which leads to biased prediction of breeding values using best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP). The objective of this study was to come out with a genomic prediction strategy that can utilize shallow pedigree information and predict unbiased and more accurate GEBV for sex-limited traits in a small population using single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP). The data and models for a population under selection were simulated. Out of current 10 generations, 10th generation with 1000 candidates served as validation population. For the complete pedigree scenario, pedigree (P)BLUP estimated breeding values (EBV) were unbiased with accuracy (r) of 0.35 ± 0.02 and 0.26 ± 0.01 for 0.3 and 0.1 h2 scenario, respectively. For the shallow pedigree, biased prediction of breeding values and low accuracies were obtained with linear decline in the accuracy of EBV for removal of information on more distant pedigree. Accuracy and bias (ρ) for scenario with removing 4 distant generations from pedigree were 0.30 ± 0.02 and 0.55 ± 0.03, respectively, in moderate h2 scenario. Use of Genomic (G)BLUP, especially with "extreme phenotypic contrast selective genotyping," (TB) resulted in higher accuracy for a small reference of females; however, GEBV were highly biased. We observed that ssGBLUPF, where the numerator relationship matrix is corrected for inbreeding, resulted in more accurate and unbiased estimates of GEBV across shallow pedigree scenario, with TB all female reference (missing 4 distant generations: r = 0.50 ± 0.02; ρ = 0.96 ± 0.02). We recommend use of ssGBLUPF with two tailed selectively genotyped all female reference in shallow pedigree scenarios, to obtain unbiased and accurate GEBV for sex-limited traits, when resources are limited.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genomic selection; Prediction bias; Selective genotyping; Shallow pedigree; Simulation; Single-step GBLUP

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36210357     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-022-03340-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.893


  23 in total

1.  Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model.

Authors:  C R Henderson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Including different groups of genotyped females for genomic prediction in a Nordic Jersey population.

Authors:  H Gao; P Madsen; U S Nielsen; G P Aamand; G Su; K Byskov; J Jensen
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score.

Authors:  I Aguilar; I Misztal; D L Johnson; A Legarra; S Tsuruta; T J Lawlor
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  Multiple-trait mapping of quantitative trait loci after selective genotyping using logistic regression.

Authors:  J M Henshall; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Effect of selection and selective genotyping for creation of reference on bias and accuracy of genomic prediction.

Authors:  Gopal R Gowane; Sang Hong Lee; Sam Clark; Nasir Moghaddar; Hawlader A Al-Mamun; Julius H J van der Werf
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Selection for female fertility using censored fertility traits and investigation of the relationship with milk production.

Authors:  O González-Recio; R Alenda; Y M Chang; K A Weigel; D Gianola
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Short communication: Characterization of the genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in 2 divergent selection lines of dairy cows.

Authors:  G Banos; M P Coffey
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Inbreeding depression on female fertility and calving ease in Spanish dairy cattle.

Authors:  O González-Recio; E López de Maturana; J P Gutiérrez
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Characteristics of linkage disequilibrium in North American Holsteins.

Authors:  Jarmila Bohmanova; Mehdi Sargolzaei; Flavio S Schenkel
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes.

Authors:  Samuel A Clark; John M Hickey; Hans D Daetwyler; Julius H J van der Werf
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.