Literature DB >> 21257054

Prevalence of gastrointestinal disorders recorded at postmortem inspection in white veal calves and associated risk factors.

M Brscic1, L F M Heutinck, M Wolthuis-Fillerup, N Stockhofe, B Engel, E K Visser, F Gottardo, E A M Bokkers, B J Lensink, G Cozzi, C G Van Reenen.   

Abstract

The study aimed at assessing the prevalence of poor rumen development, presence of rumen plaques, rumen papillae hyperkeratinization, and abomasal lesions in veal calves and to investigate risk factors for their occurrence at the farm level. Within a wide cross-sectional study, a sample of 170 veal farms representative of the European veal meat production systems was considered in the 3 major producing countries (99 in the Netherlands, 47 in France, and 24 in Italy). An average of 59 ± 10 (SD) rumens and abomasa belonging to calves from a single batch per farm were inspected at the abattoir by trained observers to assess the incidence of these gastrointestinal disorders. Potential risk factors for their occurrence related to farm management, housing, and to the feeding plan were obtained by a questionnaire submitted to the stockperson. Prevalence of poor rumen development (almost no papillae present), rumen plaques, and hyperkeratinization were 60.4, 31.4, and 6.1% of rumens, respectively, whereas abomasal lesions in the pyloric area were recorded in 74.1% of abomasa. Independent variables related to the feeding system confirmed to be the main risk factors for the occurrence of gastrointestinal disorders in veal calves. However, additional risk sources for each given problem were identified among housing and management variables. The provision of a low amount of solid feed (≤ 50kg of dry matter/head per cycle) was a relevant risk for rumen underdevelopment. Rumen wall alterations (plaques and hyperkeratinization) and abomasal lesions were instead associated with the administration of large quantities of solids (151-300 kg of dry matter/head per cycle) in calves receiving milk replacer during the entire fattening cycle. Among the types of solid feed, cereal grain acted as a preventive measure for low rumen development, whereas it was a risk factor for the occurrence of rumen plaques, papillae hyperkeratinization, and abomasal lesions. Some housing and management options adopted to improve veal calf welfare (i.e., higher space allowance and use of heating) were associated with lower risk for gastrointestinal disorders. Copyright Â
© 2011 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21257054     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  6 in total

1.  Risk factors for poor health outcomes for male dairy calves undergoing transportation in western Canada.

Authors:  Devon J Wilson; Jane Stojkov; David L Renaud; David Fraser
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Cryptosporidium infection in a veal calf cohort in France: molecular characterization of species in a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Jérôme Follet; Karine Guyot; Hélène Leruste; Anne Follet-Dumoulin; Ourida Hammouma-Ghelboun; Gabriela Certad; Eduardo Dei-Cas; Patrice Halama
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.683

3.  The Effect of Steps to Promote Higher Levels of Farm Animal Welfare across the EU. Societal versus Animal Scientists' Perceptions of Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Xavier Averós; Miguel A Aparicio; Paolo Ferrari; Jonathan H Guy; Carmen Hubbard; Otto Schmid; Vlatko Ilieski; Hans A M Spoolder
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Scientific Opinion on the welfare of cattle kept for beef production and the welfare in intensive calf farming systems.

Authors: 
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2012-05-15

5.  Chopped or long roughage: what do calves prefer? Using cross point analysis of double demand functions.

Authors:  Laura E Webb; Margit Bak Jensen; Bas Engel; Cornelis G van Reenen; Walter J J Gerrits; Imke J M de Boer; Eddie A M Bokkers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Using routinely collected data to evaluate risk factors for mortality of veal calves.

Authors:  I M G A Santman-Berends; A J G de Bont-Smolenaars; L Roos; A G J Velthuis; G van Schaik
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.670

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.