Literature DB >> 21256692

Evaluation of the "Consultation and Relational Empathy" (CARE) measure by means of Rasch-analysis at the example of cancer patients.

Markus Wirtz1, Maren Boecker, Thomas Forkmann, Melanie Neumann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study are: (1) analysis of unidimensionality of the German version of the "Consultation and Relational Empathy" (CARE) measure and (2) identification of moderating variables affecting the scale structure.
METHODS: The CARE-measure was evaluated by means of Rasch-analysis in a sample of N=326 cancer patients. Association of diagnosis and treatment as well as patients' characteristics was analyzed by person-fit measures and Differential Item Functioning.
RESULTS: Nine of the original 10 CARE items fit to the Rasch-model. For breast and prostate cancer, as well as for patients taking complementary and alternative medicine treatment, item biases affect the scale structure. Furthermore, older patients and patients with higher social support exhibit substantial deviations from model predictions.
CONCLUSIONS: Only the nine-item version of the CARE-measure allows for the unidimensional assessment of physician empathy. Especially for specific diagnosis and treatment groups, the CARE-items indicate variations in the underlying latent construct of physician empathy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The CARER-measure provides a theory-based and psychometrically sound basis for the assessment of PE. It can be used to enhance the fairness of the assessment and to further identify valuable information about the influence of patient characteristics on the structure of the construct PE.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21256692     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  9 in total

1.  Cancer worry and empathy moderate the effect of a survivorship-focused intervention on quality of life.

Authors:  Patricia A Parker; Smita C Banerjee; Matthew J Matasar; Carma L Bylund; Elizabeth Schofield; Yuelin Li; Paul B Jacobsen; Alan B Astrow; Howard Leventhal; Steven Horwitz; David Kissane
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Validity and reliability of a Korean version of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure.

Authors:  Kye-Yeung Park; Jinho Shin; Hoon-Ki Park; Yu Mi Kim; Seon Young Hwang; Jeong-Hun Shin; Ran Heo; Soorack Ryu; Stewart W Mercer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.263

3.  Physician empathy: definition, outcome-relevance and its measurement in patient care and medical education.

Authors:  Melanie Neumann; Christian Scheffer; Diethard Tauschel; Gabriele Lutz; Markus Wirtz; Friedrich Edelhäuser
Journal:  GMS Z Med Ausbild       Date:  2012-02-15

Review 4.  Measurement invariance across chronic conditions: a systematic review and an empirical investigation of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ™).

Authors:  Michael Schuler; Gunda Musekamp; Jürgen Bengel; Sandra Nolte; Richard H Osborne; Hermann Faller
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  Effectiveness of the addition of therapeutic alliance with minimal intervention in the treatment of patients with chronic, nonspecific low back pain and low risk of involvement of psychosocial factors: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (TalkBack trial).

Authors:  Felipe Ribeiro Cabral Fagundes; Caique de Melo do Espírito Santo; Francine Mendonça de Luna Teixeira; Thaís Vanelli Tonini; Cristina Maria Nunes Cabral
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Physician Empathy Interacts with Breaking Bad News in Predicting Lung Cancer and Pleural Mesothelioma Patient Survival: Timing May Be Crucial.

Authors:  Sophie Lelorain; Alexis Cortot; Véronique Christophe; Claire Pinçon; Yori Gidron
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Midwives' empathy and shared decision making from women's perspective - sensitivity of an assessment to compare quality of care in prenatal and obstetric care.

Authors:  Anja Alexandra Schulz; Markus Antonius Wirtz
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.105

8.  A Swedish version of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure.

Authors:  K Crosta Ahlforn; E Bojner Horwitz; W Osika
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.581

9.  The Effect of Robot Attentional Behaviors on User Perceptions and Behaviors in a Simulated Health Care Interaction: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Deborah L Johanson; Ho Seok Ahn; Bruce A MacDonald; Byeong Kyu Ahn; JongYoon Lim; Euijun Hwang; Craig J Sutherland; Elizabeth Broadbent
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 5.428

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.