Literature DB >> 21256246

Genotoxicity biomarkers in occupational exposure to formaldehyde--the case of histopathology laboratories.

Carina Ladeira1, Susana Viegas, Elisabete Carolino, João Prista, Manuel C Gomes, Miguel Brito.   

Abstract

Formaldehyde, classified by the IARC as carcinogenic in humans and experimental animals, is a chemical agent that is widely used in histopathology laboratories. The exposure to this substance is epidemiologically linked to cancer and to nuclear changes detected by the cytokinesis-block micronucleus test (CBMN). This method is extensively used in molecular epidemiology, since it provides information on several biomarkers of genotoxicity, such as micronuclei (MN), which are biomarkers of chromosomes breakage or loss, nucleoplasmic bridges (NPB), common biomarkers of chromosome rearrangement, poor repair and/or telomere fusion, and nuclear buds (NBUD), biomarkers of elimination of amplified DNA. The aim of this study is to compare the frequency of genotoxicity biomarkers, provided by the CBMN assay in peripheral lymphocytes and the MN test in buccal cells, between individuals occupationally exposed and non-exposed to formaldehyde and other environmental factors, namely tobacco and alcohol consumption. The sample comprised two groups: 56 individuals occupationally exposed to formaldehyde (cases) and 85 unexposed individuals (controls), from whom both peripheral blood and exfoliated epithelial cells of the oral mucosa were collected in order to measure the genetic endpoints proposed in this study. The mean level of TWA(8h) was 0.16±0.11 ppm (<detection limit until 0.51 ppm) and the mean of ceiling values was 1.14±0.74 ppm (0.18-2.93 ppm). All genotoxicity biomarkers showed significant increases in exposed workers in comparison with controls (Mann-Whitney test, p<0.002) and the analysis of confounding factors showed that there were no differences between genders. As for age, only the mean MN frequency in lymphocytes was found significantly higher in elderly people among the exposed groups (p=0.006), and there was also evidence of an interaction between age and gender with regards to that biomarker in those exposed. Smoking habits did not influence the frequency of the biomarkers, whereas alcohol consumption only influenced the MN frequency in lymphocytes in controls (p=0.011), with drinkers showing higher mean values. These results provide evidence of the association between occupational exposure to formaldehyde and the presence of genotoxicity biomarkers.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21256246     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  12 in total

1.  Chromosome-wide aneuploidy study of cultured circulating myeloid progenitor cells from workers occupationally exposed to formaldehyde.

Authors:  Qing Lan; Martyn T Smith; Xiaojiang Tang; Weihong Guo; Roel Vermeulen; Zhiying Ji; Wei Hu; Alan E Hubbard; Min Shen; Cliona M McHale; Chuangyi Qiu; Songwang Liu; Boris Reiss; Laura Beane-Freeman; Aaron Blair; Yichen Ge; Jun Xiong; Laiyu Li; Stephen M Rappaport; Hanlin Huang; Nathaniel Rothman; Luoping Zhang
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  Evaluating chromosomal damage in workers exposed to hexavalent chromium and the modulating role of polymorphisms of DNA repair genes.

Authors:  Erika Halasova; Tatiana Matakova; Ludovit Musak; Veronika Polakova; Lucia Letkova; Dusan Dobrota; Pavel Vodicka
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Estimation of formaldehyde occupational exposure limit based on genetic damage in some Iranian exposed workers using benchmark dose method.

Authors:  Rezvan Zendehdel; Masoomeh Vahabi; Roya Sedghi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Cytogenetic abnormality in exfoliated cells of buccal mucosa in head and neck cancer patients in the Tunisian population: impact of different exposure sources.

Authors:  Rim Khlifi; Fatma Trabelsi-Ksibi; Amine Chakroun; Ahmed Rebai; Amel Hamza-Chaffai
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Could formaldehyde induce mutagenic and cytotoxic effects in buccal epithelial cells during anatomy classes?

Authors:  D-C Lorenzoni; L-P Pinheiro; H-S Nascimento; C-S Menegardo; R-G Silva; W-G Bautz; J-F Henriques; K-L Almeida-Coburn; L-N da Gama-de-Souza
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2017-01-01

6.  Volatile Organic Compounds in Anatomical Pathology Wards: Comparative and Qualitative Assessment of Indoor Airborne Pollution.

Authors:  Massimo Cipolla; Alberto Izzotti; Filippo Ansaldi; Paolo Durando; Maria Teresa Piccardo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Role of Macronutrients and Micronutrients in DNA Damage: Results From a Food Frequency Questionnaire.

Authors:  Carina Ladeira; Elisabete Carolino; Manuel C Gomes; Miguel Brito
Journal:  Nutr Metab Insights       Date:  2017-02-16

Review 8.  The use of genotoxicity biomarkers in molecular epidemiology: applications in environmental, occupational and dietary studies.

Authors:  Carina Ladeira; Lenka Smajdova
Journal:  AIMS Genet       Date:  2017-08-11

Review 9.  Recent trend in risk assessment of formaldehyde exposures from indoor air.

Authors:  Gunnar Damgård Nielsen; Søren Thor Larsen; Peder Wolkoff
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.153

10.  New results on formaldehyde: the 2nd International Formaldehyde Science Conference (Madrid, 19-20 April 2012).

Authors:  Hermann M Bolt; Peter Morfeld
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 5.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.