Literature DB >> 21254913

Ownership of uncertainty: healthcare professionals counseling and treating women from hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families who receive an inconclusive BRCA1/2 genetic test result.

Regina Kenen1, Audrey Ardern-Jones, Elly Lynch, Rosalind Eeles.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to understand more fully how healthcare professionals deal with the uncertainty intrinsic in counseling and treating women from hereditary breast/ovarian cancer families who receive inconclusive BRCA1/2 genetic test results (genetic tests that do not find a mutation to account for the family history).
METHODS: We conducted a small, qualitative, exploratory study using open-ended semistructured interviews of 12 geneticists, genetic counselor/nurses, oncologists, gynecologists, and breast surgeons at a major UK cancer center. We asked questions about how these professionals dealt with the large amount of uncertainty raised by an inconclusive result, how they communicated the uncertainty involved, their feelings about presenting medical management options based on information fraught with uncertainty, the role of the media, differences in perspectives by specialty, and personal feelings about the uncertainty.
RESULTS: Based on themes generated by the data, we proposed the concept "ownership of uncertainty" (sole, shared, diffused, normalized, transferred) to explain how the professionals in this study dealt with this high degree of uncertainty. A shared ownership of uncertainty was the dominant model during the presentation of information given by the professionals as part of their consultation with their patients. However, the final decision for management was left primarily to the woman seeking advice, even though several of the professionals reported feeling uneasy about this.
CONCLUSION: The concept "ownership of uncertainty" helps advance the understanding of how the healthcare professionals deal with the uncertainty intrinsic to an inconclusive BRCA1/2 genetic test result within the current social context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21254913      PMCID: PMC3064637          DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2010.0071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers        ISSN: 1945-0257


  30 in total

1.  Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up-and there's no going back.

Authors:  A Coulter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

2.  Do the print media "hype" genetic research? A comparison of newspaper stories and peer-reviewed research papers.

Authors:  Tania M Bubela; Timothy A Caulfield
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  The effects of problem-based learning during medical school on physician competency: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gerald Choon-Huat Koh; Hoon Eng Khoo; Mee Lian Wong; David Koh
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Medical knowledge overload: a disturbing trend for physicians.

Authors:  R E Hunt; R G Newman
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  1997

5.  Tolerance for uncertainty and perceived risk among women receiving uninformative BRCA1/2 test results.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Tiffani DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Sarah Rogers; Jessica Rispoli; Karen Brown; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.908

6.  Survival in prospectively ascertained familial breast cancer: analysis of a series stratified by tumour characteristics, BRCA mutations and oophorectomy.

Authors:  Pål Møller; Ake Borg; D Gareth Evans; Neva Haites; Marta M Reis; Hans Vasen; Elaine Anderson; C Michael Steel; Jaran Apold; David Goudie; Anthony Howell; Fiona Lalloo; Lovise Maehle; Helen Gregory; Ketil Heimdal
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-10-20       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Negotiating the diagnostic uncertainty of contested illnesses: physician practices and paradigms.

Authors:  Debra A Swoboda
Journal:  Health (London)       Date:  2008-10

Review 8.  Hereditary breast cancer: new genetic developments, new therapeutic avenues.

Authors:  Philippe M Campeau; William D Foulkes; Marc D Tischkowitz
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 9.  The pathology of inherited breast cancer.

Authors:  Jane E Armes; Deon J Venter
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.306

Review 10.  The converged experience of risk and disease.

Authors:  Robert A Aronowitz
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.911

View more
  2 in total

1.  An exploration of genetic counselors' needs and experiences with prenatal chromosomal microarray testing.

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt; Katherine Kellom; Alexandra Barbarese; W Andrew Faucett; Ronald J Wapner
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  "Nothing is absolute in life": understanding uncertainty in the context of psychiatric genetic counseling from the perspective of those with serious mental illness.

Authors:  Catriona Hippman; Zoe Lohn; Andrea Ringrose; Angela Inglis; Joanna Cheek; Jehannine C Austin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 2.537

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.