OBJECTIVE: Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease comprises a large number of genetically distinct forms of inherited peripheral neuropathies. The relative uniform phenotypes in many patients with CMT make it difficult to decide which of the over 35 known CMT genes are affected in a given patient. Genetic testing decision trees are therefore broadly based on a small number of major subtypes (eg, CMT1, CMT2) and the observed mutation frequency for CMT genes. Since conventional genetic testing is expensive many rare genes are not being tested for at all. METHODS: Whole-exome sequencing has recently been introduced as a novel and alternative approach. This method is capable of resequencing a nearly complete set of coding exons in an individual. We performed whole-exome sequencing in an undiagnosed family with CMT. RESULTS: Within over 24,000 variants detected in 2 exomes of a CMT family, we identified a nonsynonymous GJB1 (Cx32) mutation. This variant had been reported previously as pathogenic in X-linked CMT families. Sanger sequencing confirmed complete cosegregation in the family. Affected individuals had a marked early involvement of the upper distal extremities and displayed a mild reduction of nerve conduction velocities. INTERPRETATION: We have shown for the first time in a genetically highly heterogeneous dominant disease that exome sequencing is a valuable method for comprehensive medical diagnosis. Further improvements of exon capture design, next-generation sequencing accuracy, and a constant price decline will soon lead to the adoption of genomic approaches in gene testing of Mendelian disease.
OBJECTIVE:Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease comprises a large number of genetically distinct forms of inherited peripheral neuropathies. The relative uniform phenotypes in many patients with CMT make it difficult to decide which of the over 35 known CMT genes are affected in a given patient. Genetic testing decision trees are therefore broadly based on a small number of major subtypes (eg, CMT1, CMT2) and the observed mutation frequency for CMT genes. Since conventional genetic testing is expensive many rare genes are not being tested for at all. METHODS: Whole-exome sequencing has recently been introduced as a novel and alternative approach. This method is capable of resequencing a nearly complete set of coding exons in an individual. We performed whole-exome sequencing in an undiagnosed family with CMT. RESULTS: Within over 24,000 variants detected in 2 exomes of a CMT family, we identified a nonsynonymous GJB1 (Cx32) mutation. This variant had been reported previously as pathogenic in X-linked CMT families. Sanger sequencing confirmed complete cosegregation in the family. Affected individuals had a marked early involvement of the upper distal extremities and displayed a mild reduction of nerve conduction velocities. INTERPRETATION: We have shown for the first time in a genetically highly heterogeneous dominant disease that exome sequencing is a valuable method for comprehensive medical diagnosis. Further improvements of exon capture design, next-generation sequencing accuracy, and a constant price decline will soon lead to the adoption of genomic approaches in gene testing of Mendelian disease.
Authors: Anita S D Saporta; Stephanie L Sottile; Lindsey J Miller; Shawna M E Feely; Carly E Siskind; Michael E Shy Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Gregory M Cooper; Eric A Stone; George Asimenos; Eric D Green; Serafim Batzoglou; Arend Sidow Journal: Genome Res Date: 2005-06-17 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: L J Bone; N Dahl; M W Lensch; P F Chance; T Kelly; E Le Guern; S Magi; G Parry; H Shapiro; S Wang Journal: Neurology Date: 1995-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Wei Wang; Chen Wang; D Brian Dawson; Erik C Thorland; Patrick A Lundquist; Bruce W Eckloff; Yanhong Wu; Saurabh Baheti; Jared M Evans; Steven S Scherer; Peter J Dyck; Christopher J Klein Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-04-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Michael J Bamshad; Sarah B Ng; Abigail W Bigham; Holly K Tabor; Mary J Emond; Deborah A Nickerson; Jay Shendure Journal: Nat Rev Genet Date: 2011-09-27 Impact factor: 53.242
Authors: Claudia Gonzaga-Jauregui; Tamar Harel; Tomasz Gambin; Maria Kousi; Laurie B Griffin; Ludmila Francescatto; Burcak Ozes; Ender Karaca; Shalini N Jhangiani; Matthew N Bainbridge; Kim S Lawson; Davut Pehlivan; Yuji Okamoto; Marjorie Withers; Pedro Mancias; Anne Slavotinek; Pamela J Reitnauer; Meryem T Goksungur; Michael Shy; Thomas O Crawford; Michel Koenig; Jason Willer; Brittany N Flores; Igor Pediaditrakis; Onder Us; Wojciech Wiszniewski; Yesim Parman; Anthony Antonellis; Donna M Muzny; Nicholas Katsanis; Esra Battaloglu; Eric Boerwinkle; Richard A Gibbs; James R Lupski Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2015-08-06 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Ganesh J Swaminathan; Eugene Bragin; Eleni A Chatzimichali; Manuel Corpas; A Paul Bevan; Caroline F Wright; Nigel P Carter; Matthew E Hurles; Helen V Firth Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2012-09-08 Impact factor: 6.150