PURPOSE: Although post-void residual urine (PVR) is frequently utilized clinically in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), mainly because of its procedural simplicity, its role as a clinical prognostic factor, predictive of treatment goals, is still under much dispute. We investigated the predictive value of PVR for BPH-related clinical events including surgery, acute urinary retention (AUR), and admission following urinary tract infection (UTI). METHODS: From January to June of 2006, patients over 50 years of age who were diagnosed with BPH for the first time at the outpatient clinic and were then treated for at least 3 years with medications were enrolled in this study. The variables of patients who underwent surgical intervention for BPH, had occurrences of AUR, or required admission due to UTI (Group 1, n=43) were compared with those of patients who were maintained with medications only (Group 2, n=266). RESULTS: Group 1 had a significantly higher PVR, more severe symptoms, and a larger prostate at the time of the initial diagnosis in both the univariate and the multivariate analysis. In the 39 patients who underwent BPH-related surgery, although there was a significant change in Qmax at the time of surgery (mean, 13.1 months), PVR and the symptom score remained unchanged compared with the initial evaluation. In the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve of Group 1 was in the order of prostate volume (0.834), PVR (0.712), and symptom score (0.621). When redivided by arbitrarily selected PVR cutoffs of 50 mL, 100 mL, and 150 mL, the relative risk of clinical BPH progression was measured as 3.93, 2.61, and 2.11. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that, in the symptomatic Korean population, increased PVR at baseline is a significant indicator of BPH-related clinical events along with increased symptom score or prostate volume.
PURPOSE: Although post-void residual urine (PVR) is frequently utilized clinically in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), mainly because of its procedural simplicity, its role as a clinical prognostic factor, predictive of treatment goals, is still under much dispute. We investigated the predictive value of PVR for BPH-related clinical events including surgery, acute urinary retention (AUR), and admission following urinary tract infection (UTI). METHODS: From January to June of 2006, patients over 50 years of age who were diagnosed with BPH for the first time at the outpatient clinic and were then treated for at least 3 years with medications were enrolled in this study. The variables of patients who underwent surgical intervention for BPH, had occurrences of AUR, or required admission due to UTI (Group 1, n=43) were compared with those of patients who were maintained with medications only (Group 2, n=266). RESULTS: Group 1 had a significantly higher PVR, more severe symptoms, and a larger prostate at the time of the initial diagnosis in both the univariate and the multivariate analysis. In the 39 patients who underwent BPH-related surgery, although there was a significant change in Qmax at the time of surgery (mean, 13.1 months), PVR and the symptom score remained unchanged compared with the initial evaluation. In the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve of Group 1 was in the order of prostate volume (0.834), PVR (0.712), and symptom score (0.621). When redivided by arbitrarily selected PVR cutoffs of 50 mL, 100 mL, and 150 mL, the relative risk of clinical BPH progression was measured as 3.93, 2.61, and 2.11. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that, in the symptomatic Korean population, increased PVR at baseline is a significant indicator of BPH-related clinical events along with increased symptom score or prostate volume.
Authors: Alan R Kristal; Kathryn B Arnold; Jeannette M Schenk; Marian L Neuhouser; Noel Weiss; Phyllis Goodman; Colleen M Antvelink; David F Penson; Ian M Thompson Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Esther Tanja Kok; Boris W Schouten; Arthur M Bohnen; Frans P M W Groeneveld; Siep Thomas; J L H Ruud Bosch Journal: J Urol Date: 2008-12-16 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Marcio Augusto Averbeck; Nelson Gianni de Lima; Gabriela Almeida Motta; Lauro Beltrão; Nury Jafar Abboud; Clarice Pereira Rigotti; William Nascimento Dos Santos; Steven Kitzberger Jaeger Dos Santos; Luis Fernando Batista da Silva; Ernani Luis Rhoden Journal: Int Braz J Urol Date: 2018 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.541
Authors: Jacklyn N Hellwege; Sarah Stallings; Eric S Torstenson; Robert Carroll; Kenneth M Borthwick; Murray H Brilliant; David Crosslin; Adam Gordon; George Hripcsak; Gail P Jarvik; James G Linneman; Parimala Devi; Peggy L Peissig; Patrick A M Sleiman; Hakon Hakonarson; Marylyn D Ritchie; Shefali Setia Verma; Ning Shang; Josh C Denny; Dan M Roden; Digna R Velez Edwards; Todd L Edwards Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-04-15 Impact factor: 4.379