Literature DB >> 14550440

Weak correlation between bladder outlet obstruction and probability to void to completion.

Ries Kranse1, Ron van Mastrigt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the weak correlation between bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), as diagnosed using the provisional International Continence Society nomogram for the definition of BOO in men, and postvoid residual urine volume.
METHODS: The relationship between voiding to completion and several indexes for bladder outlet resistance and bladder contractility was studied in 131 pressure flow studies in male patients using multivariate logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: The International Continence Society nomogram and the related BOO index weakly predict for postvoid residual urine volume (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.63 and 0.64, respectively). The BOO index primarily measures bladder outlet resistance. If the nomogram or BOO index is augmented with bladder contractility information, the postvoid residual urine volume can be predicted significantly better (eg, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [0.89] for the combination of the BOO index and bladder contractility information).
CONCLUSIONS: The weak correlation between BOO and postvoid residual urine volume is related to the fact that emptying the bladder to completion depends on bladder contractility, as well as bladder outlet resistance. It is possible to estimate the probability to void to completion quite accurately on the basis of bladder outlet resistance and bladder contractility. We named this probability "relative bladder outlet resistance." A high probability of a postvoid residual urine volume may be assumed to indicate "relative BOO." By its very nature, the correlation between "relative BOO" and postvoid residual urine volume is good.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14550440     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00575-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

Review 1.  Is multichannel urodynamic assessment necessary before considering a surgical treatment of BPH? Pros and cons.

Authors:  Xavier Biardeau; Mohamed A Elkoushy; Shachar Aharony; Mostafa Elhilali; Jacques Corcos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  The role of invasive and non-invasive urodynamics in male voiding lower urinary tract symptoms.

Authors:  Brian A Parsons; Elizabeth Bright; Ahmed M Shaban; Anne Whitehouse; Marcus J Drake
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Urine flow acceleration is superior to Qmax in diagnosing BOO in patients with BPH.

Authors:  Jian-Guo Wen; Lin-Gang Cui; Yi-Dong Li; Xiao-Ping Shang; Wen Zhu; Rui-Li Zhang; Qing-Jun Meng; Sheng-Jun Zhang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-01

Review 4.  The Use of Urodynamics Assessment Before the Surgical Treatment of BPH.

Authors:  Ahmed El-Zawahry; Shaheen Alanee; Angela Malan-Elzawahry
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Clinical Implications of Residual Urine in Korean Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Patients: A Prognostic Factor for BPH-Related Clinical Events.

Authors:  Young Hwii Ko; Ji Yun Chae; Seung Min Jeong; Jae Il Kang; Hong Jae Ahn; Hyung Woo Kim; Sung Gu Kang; Hoon Ah Jang; Jun Cheon; Je Jong Kim; Jeong Gu Lee
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 2.835

6.  Non-invasive clinical parameters for the prediction of urodynamic bladder outlet obstruction: analysis using causal Bayesian networks.

Authors:  Myong Kim; Abhilash Cheeti; Changwon Yoo; Minsoo Choo; Jae-Seung Paick; Seung-June Oh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.