PURPOSE: To analyse the spectrum of bacterial keratitis isolates and their in vitro antibiotic susceptibilities over a 10-year period in Oxford, UK; and to compare the in vitro efficacy of ciprofloxacin with that of the combination of gentamicin and cefuroxime over the same period. METHODS: All culture-positive corneal scrapes received from the Oxford Eye Hospital between July 1999 and June 2009 were identified retrospectively using a local microbiology database. For analysis of trends over time, the data was split into two equal 5-year periods. Statistical analysis was done using the χ² and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: Over the 10-year study period, 467 corneal scrapes were performed of which 252 (54.0%) had positive bacterial cultures, growing a total of 267 organisms. The most commonly isolated bacteria were Staphylococci(40.1%) followed by Pseudomonasspecies (28.5%), other Gram-negative species (17.2%), Streptococci(7.1%), and Corynebacteria(6.0%). Between the first and second time periods there was an increase in the number of coagulase-negative Staphylococciand an increased resistance of the non-Pseudomonas Gram-negative group to chloramphenicol. Of the 189 isolates tested for sensitivity to both empirical antibiotic regimens, 176 (93.2%) were susceptible to ciprofloxacin whereas 188 (99.5%) were susceptible to either gentamicin or cefuroxime (P=0.0015). CONCLUSIONS: The spectrum of bacterial keratitis isolates and their in vitro antibiotic sensitivity patterns have generally remained stable over time. The combination of gentamicin and cefuroxime provides a broader spectrum of antimicrobial cover than ciprofloxacin monotherapy in Oxford, although both regimens continue to be appropriate choices for the initial management of this condition.
PURPOSE: To analyse the spectrum of bacterial keratitis isolates and their in vitro antibiotic susceptibilities over a 10-year period in Oxford, UK; and to compare the in vitro efficacy of ciprofloxacin with that of the combination of gentamicin and cefuroxime over the same period. METHODS: All culture-positive corneal scrapes received from the Oxford Eye Hospital between July 1999 and June 2009 were identified retrospectively using a local microbiology database. For analysis of trends over time, the data was split into two equal 5-year periods. Statistical analysis was done using the χ² and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: Over the 10-year study period, 467 corneal scrapes were performed of which 252 (54.0%) had positive bacterial cultures, growing a total of 267 organisms. The most commonly isolated bacteria were Staphylococci(40.1%) followed by Pseudomonasspecies (28.5%), other Gram-negative species (17.2%), Streptococci(7.1%), and Corynebacteria(6.0%). Between the first and second time periods there was an increase in the number of coagulase-negative Staphylococciand an increased resistance of the non-Pseudomonas Gram-negative group to chloramphenicol. Of the 189 isolates tested for sensitivity to both empirical antibiotic regimens, 176 (93.2%) were susceptible to ciprofloxacin whereas 188 (99.5%) were susceptible to either gentamicin or cefuroxime (P=0.0015). CONCLUSIONS: The spectrum of bacterial keratitis isolates and their in vitro antibiotic sensitivity patterns have generally remained stable over time. The combination of gentamicin and cefuroxime provides a broader spectrum of antimicrobial cover than ciprofloxacin monotherapy in Oxford, although both regimens continue to be appropriate choices for the initial management of this condition.
Authors: Regis P Kowalski; Deepinder K Dhaliwal; Lisa M Karenchak; Eric G Romanowski; Francis S Mah; David C Ritterband; Y Jerold Gordon Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Stephen Kaye; Stephen Tuft; Timothy Neal; Derek Tole; John Leeming; Francisco Figueiredo; Malcolm Armstrong; Peter McDonnell; Andrew Tullo; Christopher Parry Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-08-13 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: S Z Tan; A Walkden; L Au; C Fullwood; A Hamilton; A Qamruddin; M Armstrong; A K Brahma; F Carley Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2017-04-28 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Mathias Roth; Paul Goerke; Christoph Holtmann; Andreas Frings; Colin R MacKenzie; Gerd Geerling Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2022-06-10 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Michelle Y Peng; Vicky Cevallos; Stephen D McLeod; Thomas M Lietman; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer Journal: Cornea Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Bogusława Orzechowska-Wylęgała; Adam Wylęgała; Michał Buliński; Iwona Niedzielska Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-02-01 Impact factor: 3.411