Literature DB >> 28452995

Twelve-year analysis of microbial keratitis trends at a UK tertiary hospital.

S Z Tan1,2, A Walkden1,2, L Au1,2, C Fullwood3,4, A Hamilton1, A Qamruddin5, M Armstrong5, A K Brahma1,2, F Carley1,2.   

Abstract

PurposeTo investigate the frequencies, trends, and in vitro drug susceptibilities of the causative pathogens in microbial keratitis in Manchester Royal Eye Hospital.Patients and methodsCorneal scrape results recorded by the microbiology service between 2004 and 2015 were extracted from an established database. A total of 4229 corneal scrape specimens were identified from an established database. First-line antibiotic treatment in our centre during the study period was ofloxacin and second line was cefuroxime and gentamicin.ResultsMean age was 45.9±21.0. A total of 1379 samples (32.6%) were culture positive. One hundred forty-eight (10.7%) specimens cultured multiple organisms. Of the 1539 organisms identified, 63.3% were Gram-positive bacteria, 27.3% Gram-negative bacteria, 7.1% fungi, and 2.3% Acanthamoebae. A decreasing trend in Gram-positive isolates was found together with a stable trend in Gram negatives and an increasing trend in Acanthamoeba and fungi. There appeared to be a significant increasing trend of Moraxella infection (P=0.001). In all, 83.1 and 90.8% of Gram-positive and -negative isolates tested were susceptible to ofloxacin, respectively. Cefuroxime covered 86.6% of Gram-positive and 61.4% of Gram-negative isolates, whereas gentamicin covered 88.8 and 96.5% of Gram-positive and -negative isolates, respectively.ConclusionWe found a change in the type of Gram-negative organisms isolated over time, with the Moraxella species on the rise. Reassuringly, no significant increase in resistance was observed in vitro for any of the commonly used antibiotics. Ofloxacin remains a good first-line antibiotic treatment but duo-therapy does have broader coverage and should be considered in non-responsive cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28452995      PMCID: PMC5584503          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2017.55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  33 in total

Review 1.  Acanthamoeba keratitis: diagnosis and treatment update 2009.

Authors:  John K G Dart; Valerie P J Saw; Simon Kilvington
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Assessment of real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of Acanthamoeba and prognosis determinants of Acanthamoeba keratitis.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Ikeda; Dai Miyazaki; Keiko Yakura; Asako Kawaguchi; Ryoko Ishikura; Yoshitsugu Inoue; Tsuyoshi Mito; Atsushi Shiraishi; Yuichi Ohashi; Shiro Higaki; Motoki Itahashi; Masahiko Fukuda; Yoshikazu Shimomura; Kenji Yagita
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Emerging fluoroquinolone resistance in bacterial keratitis: a 5-year review.

Authors:  M H Goldstein; R P Kowalski; Y J Gordon
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Update on fungal keratitis from 1999 to 2008.

Authors:  Elvin H Yildiz; Yasmine F Abdalla; Ahmed F Elsahn; Christopher J Rapuano; Kristin M Hammersmith; Peter R Laibson; Elisabeth J Cohen
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  Initial treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa contact lens-associated keratitis with topical chloramphenicol, and effect on outcome.

Authors:  Rabia Bourkiza; Stephen Kaye; Catey Bunce; Jayendra Shankar; Timothy Neal; Stephen Tuft
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Branhamella catarrhalis keratitis.

Authors:  D G Heidemann; E Alfonso; R K Forster; S Ullman; S P Holland; A Mendelsohn; D Miller
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-04-15       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Efficacy of ofloxacin vs cefazolin and tobramycin in the therapy for bacterial keratitis. Report from the Bacterial Keratitis Study Research Group.

Authors:  T P O'Brien; M G Maguire; N E Fink; E Alfonso; P McDonnell
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-10

8.  Clinical and Microbiological Profile of Bacterial Microbial Keratitis in a Portuguese Tertiary Referral Center-Where Are We in 2015?

Authors:  Carla Sofia Ferreira; Luis Figueira; Nuno Moreira-Gonçalves; Raúl Moreira; Luis Torrão; Fernando Falcão-Reis
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.018

9.  Distribution of bacterial keratitis and emerging resistance to antibiotics in China from 2001 to 2004.

Authors:  Chen Zhang; Yanchuang Liang; Shijing Deng; Zhiqun Wang; Ran Li; Xuguang Sun
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09

10.  Clinical outcomes of keratitis.

Authors:  Matthew D Green; Andrew J G Apel; Thomas Naduvilath; Fiona J Stapleton
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.207

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  The persistent dilemma of microbial keratitis: Global burden, diagnosis, and antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Lawson Ung; Paulo J M Bispo; Swapna S Shanbhag; Michael S Gilmore; James Chodosh
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 6.048

2.  A 10-year analysis of microbiological profiles of microbial keratitis: the North East England Study.

Authors:  Darren Shu Jeng Ting; Chris Settle; Stephen J Morgan; Oliver Baylis; Saurabh Ghosh
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Spectrum and resistance in bacterial infections of the ocular surface in a German tertiary referral center 2009-2019.

Authors:  Mathias Roth; Paul Goerke; Christoph Holtmann; Andreas Frings; Colin R MacKenzie; Gerd Geerling
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Incidence and Characteristics of Culture-Positive Microbial Keratitis at a Tertiary Eye Hospital in the UK.

Authors:  Luke Michaels; Jay Richardson; Andrew Walkden; Fiona Carley
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-10

5.  Comparison of culture, confocal microscopy and PCR in routine hospital use for microbial keratitis diagnosis.

Authors:  Jeremy J Hoffman; John K G Dart; Surjo K De; Nicole Carnt; Georgia Cleary; Scott Hau
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 4.456

Review 6.  Infectious keratitis: an update on epidemiology, causative microorganisms, risk factors, and antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Darren Shu Jeng Ting; Charlotte Shan Ho; Rashmi Deshmukh; Dalia G Said; Harminder S Dua
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Utility of investigation for suspected microbial keratitis: a diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  Stephen Tuft; Catey Bunce; Surjo De; John Thomas
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 4.456

8.  Association Between Season, Temperature and Causative Organism in Microbial Keratitis in the UK.

Authors:  Andrew Walkden; Catherine Fullwood; Shi Zhuan Tan; Leon Au; Malcolm Armstrong; Arun K Brahma; Jaya D Chidambaram; Fiona Carley
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Microbial Spectrum and Resistance Patterns in Ocular Infections: A 15-Year Review in East China.

Authors:  Chunhong Liu; Baixing Ding; Jian Ji; Zhujian Wang; Huiwen Chen; Wenjun Cao
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 10.  Global and Multi-National Prevalence of Fungal Diseases-Estimate Precision.

Authors:  Felix Bongomin; Sara Gago; Rita O Oladele; David W Denning
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.