Literature DB >> 21251839

The Twin Peg Oxford partial knee replacement: the first 100 cases.

Stephen H White1, Sharon Roberts, Peter W Jones.   

Abstract

We present the clinical results of the first 100 patients who received the Twin Peg Oxford partial knee replacement which has a 15° extra femoral surface for contact in deep flexion, and has two pegs for more secure fixation. We measured the clinical outcome 2 years after the medial unicompartmental arthroplasty using patient and surgeon derived outcome measures. The results showed a mean Oxford Knee Score of 41, a mean American Knee Society Objective Score of 93 and a Functional Score of 84, a mean range of motion of 130° and a high satisfaction rate. Results were significantly better in male patients. There were no deaths, infections, dislocations, fractures or revisions. There were no pathological radiolucencies suggestive of early loosening. We conclude that the Twin Peg Oxford partial knee replacement shows excellent clinical and radiological results at 2 years. For surgeons who have concern over the risk of femoral loosening with the single peg Oxford knee, or seek an improved surface area of contact in full flexion, this implant offers an excellent alternative.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21251839     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2010.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  7 in total

1.  Cam impingement of the posterior femoral condyle in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Murat Bozkurt; Ramazan Akmese; Nurdan Cay; Çetin Isik; Yenel Gurkan Bilgetekin; Merve Gulbiz Kartal; Osman Tecimel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Early Results of Oxford Mobile Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) with the Microplasty Instrumentation: An Indian Experience.

Authors:  Sahil Gaba; Naman Wahal; Deepak Gautam; Hemant Pandit; Vijay Kumar; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2018-07

3.  Outcomes and early revision rate after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: prospective results from a non-designer single surgeon.

Authors:  Jonathan R B Hutt; Avtar Sur; Hartej Sur; Aine Ringrose; Mark S Rickman
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Anthropometry of the medial femoral condyle in the Chinese population: the morphometric analysis to design unicomparmental knee component.

Authors:  Feifan Lu; Xiaowei Sun; Weiguo Wang; Qidong Zhang; Wanshou Guo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  The Anterior Impingement After Mobile-Bearing Unicomparimental Knee Arthroplasty-A Neglected Problem. A Clinical Report of 14 Cases.

Authors:  Timon Röttinger; Leonard Lisitano; Andreas Wiedl; Edgar Mayr; Heinz Röttinger
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-08-19

6.  Intentionally Increased Flexion Angle of the Femoral Component in Mobile Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kye-Youl Cho; Kang-Il Kim; Sang-Jun Song; Kyu-Jin Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-03-01

7.  Two pegs are better than one: rare mode of femoral component failure in unicompartmental arthroplasty requiring revision to total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ryan Stancil; Nathan Summers; Douglas Van Citters; Adam Sassoon
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2017-11-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.