OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of functional health literacy (FHL) on preferences for decision-making; and among those initially preferring a passive decision-making role, to explore how preferences change if their physician actively encourages their involvement. METHODS: Consecutive older adults with cardiovascular disease receiving complex antithrombotic therapy completed a comprehensive assessment including measures of FHL and preferences for shared decision making. RESULTS: Half of all participants had inadequate or marginal FHL. Those with inadequate FHL were more likely (P=0.01) to prefer passive rather than active decision making styles even after controlling for age, education, and numeracy. However, 40% of patients preferring passive styles had adequate FHL and these patients were significantly more likely to change their preference to more active styles (odds ratio=7.17, P<.01) if their physician "was more supportive or encouraged participation". CONCLUSIONS: Screening FHL can provide insight into patients' preferences for active participation in decision making. Clinicians' encouragement of participation can increase engagement by patients with adequate FHL. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: We propose an algorithm for screening FHL and preferences for participating in decisions about complex medication regimens. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of functional health literacy (FHL) on preferences for decision-making; and among those initially preferring a passive decision-making role, to explore how preferences change if their physician actively encourages their involvement. METHODS: Consecutive older adults with cardiovascular disease receiving complex antithrombotic therapy completed a comprehensive assessment including measures of FHL and preferences for shared decision making. RESULTS: Half of all participants had inadequate or marginal FHL. Those with inadequate FHL were more likely (P=0.01) to prefer passive rather than active decision making styles even after controlling for age, education, and numeracy. However, 40% of patients preferring passive styles had adequate FHL and these patients were significantly more likely to change their preference to more active styles (odds ratio=7.17, P<.01) if their physician "was more supportive or encouraged participation". CONCLUSIONS: Screening FHL can provide insight into patients' preferences for active participation in decision making. Clinicians' encouragement of participation can increase engagement by patients with adequate FHL. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: We propose an algorithm for screening FHL and preferences for participating in decisions about complex medication regimens. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Authors: Darren A Dewalt; Nancy D Berkman; Stacey Sheridan; Kathleen N Lohr; Michael P Pignone Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Lorraine S Wallace; Edwin S Rogers; Steven E Roskos; David B Holiday; Barry D Weiss Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Aanand D Naik; Dena Schulman-Green; Ruth McCorkle; Elizabeth H Bradley; Sidney T Bogardus Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Lorraine S Wallace; David C Cassada; Edwin S Rogers; Michael B Freeman; Oscar H Grandas; Scott L Stevens; Mitchell H Goldman Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2007-06-15 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: P Michael Ho; Eric D Peterson; Li Wang; David J Magid; Stephan D Fihn; Greg C Larsen; Robert A Jesse; John S Rumsfeld Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-02-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Joann Seo; Melody S Goodman; Mary Politi; Melvin Blanchard; Kimberly A Kaphingst Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Kathryn M Goggins; Kenneth A Wallston; Samuel Nwosu; Jonathan S Schildcrout; Liana Castel; Sunil Kripalani Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2014
Authors: Chelsea Leonard; George Sayre; Sienna Williams; Alison Henderson; Daniel Norvell; Aaron P Turner; Joseph Czerniecki Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-03-18 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: France Légaré; Nora Moumjid-Ferdjaoui; Renée Drolet; Dawn Stacey; Martin Härter; Hilda Bastian; Marie-Dominique Beaulieu; Francine Borduas; Cathy Charles; Angela Coulter; Sophie Desroches; Gwendolyn Friedrich; Amiram Gafni; Ian D Graham; Michel Labrecque; Annie LeBlanc; Jean Légaré; Mary Politi; Joan Sargeant; Richard Thomson Journal: J Contin Educ Health Prof Date: 2013 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Alison Beauchamp; Rachelle Buchbinder; Sarity Dodson; Roy W Batterham; Gerald R Elsworth; Crystal McPhee; Louise Sparkes; Melanie Hawkins; Richard H Osborne Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-07-21 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Vanessa Rodríguez; Allen D Andrade; Rocio García-Retamero; Ramanakumar Anam; Remberto Rodríguez; Miriam Lisigurski; Joseph Sharit; Jorge G Ruiz Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2013
Authors: LeChauncy D Woodard; Cassie R Landrum; Amber B Amspoker; David Ramsey; Aanand D Naik Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2014-07-24 Impact factor: 2.711