Literature DB >> 21248592

Aortic abutment after direct vertebral rotation: plowing of pedicle screws.

Matthew R Wagner1, Jesus Burgos Flores, Ignacio Sanpera, José Herrera-Soto.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
OBJECTIVE: To report the occurrence of pedicle screw plow after individual-level direct vertebral rotation (DVR) that resulted in critical screw proximity to the aorta, from three institutions over a four-year period (2004-2008). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Thoracic pedicle screws are generally accepted as safe implants that possess sufficient strength to correct the coronal, sagittal, and now transverse plane deformities associated with scoliosis. Structural failure of the bone resulting in translation of the screw in the transverse plane, defined as plow, can occur with individual-level DVR.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all pediatric patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screws for neuromuscular and idiopathic scoliosis and underwent postoperative computed tomographic scan. We identified all patients who required a secondary procedure for implant removal because of malposition of the screw.
RESULTS: Six patients with lateral screw direction after a DVR maneuver required screw removal because of proximity to the aorta. All patients had intraoperative confirmation of adequate screw placement before introducing the rod and performing derotation. CONCLUSIONS.: The biologic limitations of vertebrae are approached as we strive to achieve further correction of the spine. Surgeons' experience and methods to assess proper screw placement may give a false sense of adequate final implant position after DVR. Vigilance to ensure proper pedicle screw position can avoid potential iatrogenic catastrophes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21248592     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820107d0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  Radiographic, clinical, and patients' assessment of segmental direct vertebral body derotation versus simple rod derotation in main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective, comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Xiangyu Tang; Jing Zhao; Yonggang Zhang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  A brief overview of 100 years of history of surgical treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Carol C Hasler
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 1.548

3.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with posteromedial translation: radiologic evaluation with a 3D low-dose system.

Authors:  Brice Ilharreborde; Guy Sebag; Wafa Skalli; Keyvan Mazda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Do vertebral derotation techniques offer better outcomes compared to traditional methods in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Authors:  Paul R P Rushton; Michael P Grevitt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Zonal differences in risk and pattern of pedicle screw perforations in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): a computerized tomography (CT) review of 1986 screws.

Authors:  C Y W Chan; M K Kwan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Scoliosis corrective force estimation from the implanted rod deformation using 3D-FEM analysis.

Authors:  Yuichiro Abe; Manabu Ito; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Hideki Sudo; Remel Salmingo; Shigeru Tadano
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2015-02-11

Review 7.  Safety of Pedicle Screws in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery.

Authors:  Chris Yin Wei Chan; Mun Keong Kwan
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-12-07

8.  Bilateral apical vertebral derotation technique by vertebral column manipulation compared with vertebral coplanar alignment technique in the correction of Lenke type 1 idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Lin Sun; Yueming Song; Limin Liu; Yonggang An; Chunguang Zhou; Zhongjie Zhou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.