Literature DB >> 21248383

Electrode alignment of transverse tripoles using a percutaneous triple-lead approach in spinal cord stimulation.

V Sankarasubramanian1, J R Buitenweg, J Holsheimer, P Veltink.   

Abstract

The aim of this modeling study is to determine the influence of electrode alignment of transverse tripoles on the paresthesia coverage of the pain area in spinal cord stimulation, using a percutaneous triple-lead approach. Transverse tripoles, comprising a central cathode and two lateral anodes, were modeled on the low-thoracic vertebral region (T10-T12) using percutaneous triple-lead configurations, with the center lead on the spinal cord midline. The triple leads were oriented both aligned and staggered. In the staggered configuration, the anodes were offset either caudally (caudally staggered) or rostrally (rostrally staggered) with respect to the midline cathode. The transverse tripolar field steering with the aligned and staggered configurations enabled the estimation of dorsal column fiber thresholds (I(DC)) and dorsal root fiber thresholds (I(DR)) at various anodal current ratios. I(DC) and I(DR) were considerably higher for the aligned transverse tripoles as compared to the staggered transverse tripoles. The aligned transverse tripoles facilitated deeper penetration into the medial dorsal columns (DCs). The staggered transverse tripoles always enabled broad and bilateral DC activation, at the expense of mediolateral steerability. The largest DC recruited area was obtained with the rostrally staggered transverse tripole. Transverse tripolar geometries, using percutaneous leads, allow for selective targeting of either medial or lateral DC fibers, if and only if the transverse tripole is aligned. Steering of anodal currents between the lateral leads of the staggered transverse tripoles cannot target medially confined populations of DC fibers in the spinal cord. An aligned transverse tripolar configuration is strongly recommended, because of its ability to provide more post-operative flexibility than other configurations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21248383     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/1/016010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  6 in total

1.  Spatial channel interactions in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Qing Tang; Raul Benítez; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Design and in vivo evaluation of more efficient and selective deep brain stimulation electrodes.

Authors:  Bryan Howell; Brian Huynh; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Assessment of axonal recruitment using model-guided preclinical spinal cord stimulation in the ex vivo adult mouse spinal cord.

Authors:  Shaquia Idlett; Mallika Halder; Tianhe Zhang; Jorge Quevedo; Natalie Brill; Wendy Gu; Michael Moffitt; Shawn Hochman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Comparison of spinal cord stimulation profiles from intra- and extradural electrode arrangements by finite element modelling.

Authors:  Qiujun Huang; Hiroyuki Oya; Oliver E Flouty; Chandan G Reddy; Matthew A Howard; George T Gillies; Marcel Utz
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Brain fMRI during orientation selective epidural spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Antonietta Canna; Lauri J Lehto; Lin Wu; Sheng Sang; Hanne Laakso; Jun Ma; Pavel Filip; Yuan Zhang; Olli Gröhn; Fabrizio Esposito; Clark C Chen; Igor Lavrov; Shalom Michaeli; Silvia Mangia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Evaluation of intradural stimulation efficiency and selectivity in a computational model of spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Bryan Howell; Shivanand P Lad; Warren M Grill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.