Literature DB >> 21247519

Incidence, predictors, and outcome of conduction disorders after transcatheter self-expandable aortic valve implantation.

Chiara Fraccaro1, Gianfranco Buja, Giuseppe Tarantini, Valeria Gasparetto, Loira Leoni, Renato Razzolini, Domenico Corrado, Raffaele Bonato, Cristina Basso, Gaetano Thiene, Gino Gerosa, Giambattista Isabella, Sabino Iliceto, Massimo Napodano.   

Abstract

The aims of the present study were to investigate the incidence and characteristics of conduction disorders (CDs) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), to analyze the predictors of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, and to evaluate the outcomes of CDs over time. In particular, we sought to investigate whether the depth of deployment and other technical aspects of valve implantation might predict the need for PPM implantation after TAVI. TAVI has been reported to favor the onset or worsening of CDs often requiring PPM implantation. A total of 70 patients with aortic stenosis due to dystrophic calcification underwent TAVI with third-generation CoreValve Revalving System from May 2007 to April 2009. We collected electrocardiograms at baseline, during TAVI, during hospitalization and at the 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits thereafter. The clinical, anatomic, and procedural variables were tested to identify the predictors of PPM implantation. The PPM dependency at follow-up was analyzed. Six patients were excluded from the analysis because of a pre-existing PPM. Of the 64 patients, 32 (50%) had one or more atrioventricular-intraventricular CDs at baseline. TAVI induced a worsening in the CDs in 49 (77%) of the 64 patients, with 25 (39%) requiring in-hospital PPM implantation. On multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of PPM implantation were the depth of the prosthesis implantation (p = 0.039) and the pre-existing right bundle branch block (p = 0.046). A trend in the recovery of the CDs over time was recorded, although 2 patients required PPM implantation 1 month after discharge for late complete atrioventricular block. In conclusion, TAVI often induces or worsens CDs, requiring PPM in more than one third of patients, although a trend in the recovery of CDs during the midterm was recorded. The independent predictors of PPM implantation were the depth of prosthesis implantation and pre-existing right bundle branch block.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21247519     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.10.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  25 in total

1.  Comparison of multicenter registries and randomized control trials for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Authors:  Shikhar Agarwal; E Murat Tuzcu; William Stewart; Navkaranbir Singh Bajaj; Lars G Svensson; Samir R Kapadia
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-07-10

Review 2.  TAVI 2012: state of the art.

Authors:  Jochen Reinöhl; Constantin von Zur Mühlen; Martin Moser; Stefan Sorg; Christoph Bode; Manfred Zehender
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Conduction disorders after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a focused review.

Authors:  Kelly M W McDonnell; Richard K Shepard
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-08

Review 4.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation-induced left bundle branch block: causes and consequences.

Authors:  Thomas T Poels; Patrick Houthuizen; Leen A F M Van Garsse; Jos G Maessen; Peter de Jaegere; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Permanent Pacemaker Implantation after TAVR - Predictors and Impact on Outcomes.

Authors:  Marcel Weber; Jan-Malte Sinning; Christoph Hammerstingl; Nikos Werner; Eberhard Grube; Georg Nickenig
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2015-05

6.  Characteristics of aorto-iliofemoral arterial tree according to aortic valve morphology in chinese patients considered for TAVR.

Authors:  Yuan Wang; Hasan Jilaihawi; Guanyuan Song; Moyang Wang; Bin Lv; Hao Wang; Guannan Niu; Zheng Zhou; Yongjian Wu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Clinical impact of a new left bundle branch block following TAVI implantation: 1-year results of the TAVIK cohort.

Authors:  Gerhard Schymik; Panagiotis Tzamalis; Peter Bramlage; Martin Heimeshoff; Alexander Würth; Rainer Wondraschek; Bernd-Dieter Gonska; Herbert Posival; Claus Schmitt; Holger Schröfel; Armin Luik
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 8.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current and future approaches.

Authors:  Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 9.  Clinical implications of conduction abnormalities and arrhythmias after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Robert M A van der Boon; Patrick Houthuizen; Rutger-Jan Nuis; Nicolas M van Mieghem; Frits Prinzen; Peter P T de Jaegere
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Long-term outcomes and prosthesis performance after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: results of self-expandable and balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves.

Authors:  Giuseppe Tarantini; Paola A M Purita; Augusto D'Onofrio; Chiara Fraccaro; Anna Chiara Frigo; Gianpiero D'Amico; Luca Nai Fovino; Marta Martin; Francesco Cardaioli; Mostafa R A Badawy; Massimo Napodano; Gino Gerosa; Sabino Iliceto
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.