BACKGROUND: Bortezomib, an inhibitor of the 26S proteasome and NF-κB, may have antitumor activity in adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). Preclinical studies have shown synergy between bortezomib and doxorubicin. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included incurable ACC, any number of prior therapies but without an anthracycline, unidimensionally measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, and ejection fraction within normal limits. Patients with stable disease for ≥9 months were excluded. Patients received bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) by intravenous (IV) push on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11, every 21 days until progression. Doxorubicin 20 mg/m(2) IV on Days 1 and 8 was added at the time of progression. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled, of whom 24 were eligible; the most common distant metastatic sites were the lung (n = 22) and the liver (n = 7). There was no objective response with single-agent bortezomib; best response was stable disease in 15 (71%) of 21 evaluable patients. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.4 months and 21 months, respectively. Of 10 evaluable patients who received bortezomib plus doxorubicin, 1 had a partial response, and 6 had stable disease. The most frequent toxicity with bortezomib was grade 3 sensory neuropathy (16%). With bortezomib plus doxorubicin, serious toxicities seen more than once were grade 3-4 neutropenia (n = 3) and grade 3 anorexia (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: Bortezomib was well tolerated and resulted in disease stabilization in a high percentage of patients but no objective responses. The combination of bortezomib and doxorubicin was also well tolerated and may warrant further investigation in ACC.
BACKGROUND:Bortezomib, an inhibitor of the 26S proteasome and NF-κB, may have antitumor activity in adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). Preclinical studies have shown synergy between bortezomib and doxorubicin. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included incurable ACC, any number of prior therapies but without an anthracycline, unidimensionally measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, and ejection fraction within normal limits. Patients with stable disease for ≥9 months were excluded. Patients received bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) by intravenous (IV) push on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11, every 21 days until progression. Doxorubicin 20 mg/m(2) IV on Days 1 and 8 was added at the time of progression. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled, of whom 24 were eligible; the most common distant metastatic sites were the lung (n = 22) and the liver (n = 7). There was no objective response with single-agent bortezomib; best response was stable disease in 15 (71%) of 21 evaluable patients. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.4 months and 21 months, respectively. Of 10 evaluable patients who received bortezomib plus doxorubicin, 1 had a partial response, and 6 had stable disease. The most frequent toxicity with bortezomib was grade 3 sensory neuropathy (16%). With bortezomib plus doxorubicin, serious toxicities seen more than once were grade 3-4 neutropenia (n = 3) and grade 3 anorexia (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS:Bortezomib was well tolerated and resulted in disease stabilization in a high percentage of patients but no objective responses. The combination of bortezomib and doxorubicin was also well tolerated and may warrant further investigation in ACC.
Authors: Nicholas Mitsiades; Constantine S Mitsiades; Paul G Richardson; Vassiliki Poulaki; Yu-Tzu Tai; Dharminder Chauhan; Galinos Fanourakis; Xuesong Gu; Charles Bailey; Marie Joseph; Towia A Libermann; Robert Schlossman; Nikhil C Munshi; Teru Hideshima; Kenneth C Anderson Journal: Blood Date: 2002-11-07 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: L D Locati; P Bossi; F Perrone; P Potepan; F Crippa; L Mariani; P Casieri; M Orsenigo; M Losa; C Bergamini; C Liberatoscioli; P Quattrone; R G Calderone; G Rinaldi; S Pilotti; L Licitra Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2008-09-18 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: J B Vermorken; J Verweij; P H de Mulder; F Cognetti; M Clavel; S Rodenhuis; A Kirkpatrick; G B Snow Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 1993-11 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Mark H Ma; Hank H Yang; Kimberly Parker; Steven Manyak; Jeffrey M Friedman; Cibby Altamirano; Zhi-qun Wu; Mitesh J Borad; Malka Frantzen; Evanthia Roussos; Jason Neeser; Amy Mikail; Julian Adams; Nelida Sjak-Shie; Robert A Vescio; James R Berenson Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Robert Haddad; A Dimitrios Colevas; Jeffrey F Krane; Dennis Cooper; Bonnie Glisson; Philip C Amrein; Linda Weeks; Rosemary Costello; Marshall Posner Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Patrick M Dillon; Gina R Petroni; Bethany J Horton; Christopher A Moskaluk; Paula M Fracasso; Michael G Douvas; Nikole Varhegyi; Snjezana Zaja-Milatovic; Christopher Y Thomas Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Sarah Atallah; Morgane Marc; Antoine Schernberg; Florence Huguet; Isabelle Wagner; Antti Mäkitie; Bertrand Baujat Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2022-06-04 Impact factor: 3.602
Authors: Charles E Myers; Zoran Gatalica; Anthony Spinelli; Michael Castro; Erica Linden; Oliver Sartor; Mathew Sargent Journal: Case Rep Oncol Date: 2014-01-16