Literature DB >> 21245787

Are we making progress?: the tenth international forum for primary care research on low back pain.

Glenn Pransky1, Jeffrey M Borkan, Amanda E Young, Daniel C Cherkin.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Synthesis and analysis of presentation and discussion highlights, with a focus on emerging trends and promising new directions in primary care research on low back pain (LBP).
OBJECTIVE: To present a summary of findings, themes, and insights from the Tenth International Forum on Primary Care Research on Low Back Pain, a meeting of researchers designed to share the latest concepts, methods, and results of research on LBP diagnosis, treatment, and disability prevention. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Earlier Forum meetings have developed several common themes and general conclusions. These are contrasted with the presentations and discussions at the 10th International Forum.
RESULTS: Major themes included concerns about the epidemic of chronic, disabling LBP, associated treatments, iatrogenesis, and the "LBP medical industrial complex"; the variability and complexity of outcomes and how their importance differed across patients in defining recovery and recurrence; the power of nonspecific effects, expectations, and therapeutic alliance; and the challenges of identifying important therapeutic subgroups. New research addressed early risk factor screening and linked intervention, nonmedical approaches to reframe the LBP problem and avoid unnecessary care, cognitive and behavioral aspects of LBP, and ways to train clinicians to implement these innovations. More appropriate use of longitudinal designs and a greater focus on implementation research was called for.
CONCLUSION: Although the field of primary care LBP research often seems to progress slowly, the Forum highlighted several important, promising developments that could substantially improve LBP research and primary care practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21245787     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f6114e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

1.  The prognostic ability of the STarT Back Tool was affected by episode duration.

Authors:  Lars Morso; Alice Kongsted; Lise Hestbaek; Peter Kent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Subgrouping for patients with low back pain: a multidimensional approach incorporating cluster analysis and the STarT Back Screening Tool.

Authors:  Jason M Beneciuk; Michael E Robinson; Steven Z George
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Identifying Treatment Effect Modifiers in the STarT Back Trial: A Secondary Analysis.

Authors:  Jason M Beneciuk; Jonathan C Hill; Paul Campbell; Ebenezer Afolabi; Steven Z George; Kate M Dunn; Nadine E Foster
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 5.820

4.  An interactive e-learning module to promote bio-psycho-social management of low back pain in healthcare professionals: a pilot study.

Authors:  Antoine Fourré; Auriane Fierens; Jef Michielsen; Laurence Ris; Frédéric Dierick; Nathalie Roussel
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2021-10-22

5.  The STarT back screening tool and individual psychological measures: evaluation of prognostic capabilities for low back pain clinical outcomes in outpatient physical therapy settings.

Authors:  Jason M Beneciuk; Mark D Bishop; Julie M Fritz; Michael E Robinson; Nabih R Asal; Anne N Nisenzon; Steven Z George
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2012-11-02

6.  A novel (targeted) kinesio taping application on chronic low back pain: Randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  María Lourdes Peñalver-Barrios; Juan Francisco Lisón; Javier Ballester-Salvador; Julia Schmitt; Aida Ezzedinne-Angulo; María Dolores Arguisuelas; Julio Doménech
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Ageism, negative attitudes, and competing co-morbidities--why older adults may not seek care for restricting back pain: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Una E Makris; Robin T Higashi; Emily G Marks; Liana Fraenkel; Joanna E M Sale; Thomas M Gill; M Carrington Reid
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.921

8.  Study protocol for patient response to spinal manipulation - a prospective observational clinical trial on physiological and patient-centered outcomes in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Ting Xia; David G Wilder; Maruti R Gudavalli; James W DeVocht; Robert D Vining; Katherine A Pohlman; Gregory N Kawchuk; Cynthia R Long; Christine M Goertz
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.659

9.  Obesity is associated with more disability at presentation and after treatment in low back pain but not in neck pain: findings from the OIOC registry.

Authors:  Maria M Wertli; Ulrike Held; Marco Campello; Shira Schecter Weiner
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Experiences of Rehabilitation Professionals with the Implementation of a Back School for Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Stefan Peters; Hermann Faller; Klaus Pfeifer; Karin Meng
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2016-07-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.