BACKGROUND: Efforts to improve quality of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are a national priority. To date, there have been few studies that have prospectively evaluated hospital quality improvement (QI) interventions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using hospitals in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) ACTION Registry-GWTG, a cluster randomized trial of the effectiveness of targeted performance feedback to facilitate process improvement for AMI care will be conducted. ACTION Registry-GWTG hospitals with a minimum of 50 AMI patients per 2 quarters are eligible for randomization. The control arm receives standard performance feedback reports, and the intervention arm receives standard performance feedback reports in addition to a supplemental report on the "top 3" centrally identified, hospital-specific performance gaps. The primary outcome will be improvement in a composite of all metrics, and the secondary outcome will be improvement in the targeted metrics. At study inception in January 2009, 149 sites were randomized: 76 to the intervention arm, and 73 to the control arm. Intervention and control sites were well balanced in terms of baseline performance, center characteristics, and AMI volume (≈70 patients per quarter). The intervention phase will continue for 5 feedback cycles, each containing 2 quarters of data feedback over 18 months. A final trial outcome report will follow. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized trial will evaluate a novel hospital-level QI intervention of targeted performance feedback for AMI, thereby demonstrating the effective use of national registries for QI and furthering our understanding of effective QI methods.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Efforts to improve quality of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are a national priority. To date, there have been few studies that have prospectively evaluated hospital quality improvement (QI) interventions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using hospitals in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) ACTION Registry-GWTG, a cluster randomized trial of the effectiveness of targeted performance feedback to facilitate process improvement for AMI care will be conducted. ACTION Registry-GWTG hospitals with a minimum of 50 AMI patients per 2 quarters are eligible for randomization. The control arm receives standard performance feedback reports, and the intervention arm receives standard performance feedback reports in addition to a supplemental report on the "top 3" centrally identified, hospital-specific performance gaps. The primary outcome will be improvement in a composite of all metrics, and the secondary outcome will be improvement in the targeted metrics. At study inception in January 2009, 149 sites were randomized: 76 to the intervention arm, and 73 to the control arm. Intervention and control sites were well balanced in terms of baseline performance, center characteristics, and AMI volume (≈70 patients per quarter). The intervention phase will continue for 5 feedback cycles, each containing 2 quarters of data feedback over 18 months. A final trial outcome report will follow. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized trial will evaluate a novel hospital-level QI intervention of targeted performance feedback for AMI, thereby demonstrating the effective use of national registries for QI and furthering our understanding of effective QI methods.
Authors: Harlan M Krumholz; Jeffrey L Anderson; Brian L Bachelder; Francis M Fesmire; Stephan D Fihn; Joanne M Foody; P Michael Ho; Mikhail N Kosiborod; Frederick A Masoudi; Brahmajee K Nallamothu Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-11-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: S B Soumerai; T J McLaughlin; J H Gurwitz; E Guadagnoli; P J Hauptman; C Borbas; N Morris; B McLaughlin; X Gao; D J Willison; R Asinger; F Gobel Journal: JAMA Date: 1998-05-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: James W Hoekstra; Charles V Pollack; Matthew T Roe; Eric D Peterson; Ralph Brindis; Robert A Harrington; Robert H Christenson; Sidney C Smith; E Magnus Ohman; W Brian Gibler Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Elizabeth H Bradley; Jeph Herrin; Jennifer A Mattera; Eric S Holmboe; Yongfei Wang; Paul Frederick; Sarah A Roumanis; Martha J Radford; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: Med Care Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Rajendra H Mehta; Matthew T Roe; Anita Y Chen; Barbara L Lytle; Charles V Pollack; Ralph G Brindis; Sidney C Smith; Robert A Harrington; Dan Fintel; Elizabeth S Fraulo; Robert M Califf; W Brian Gibler; E Magnus Ohman; Eric D Peterson Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2006-10-09
Authors: T Bruce Ferguson; Eric D Peterson; Laura P Coombs; Mary C Eiken; Meghan L Carey; Frederick L Grover; Elizabeth R DeLong Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-07-02 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jeffrey L Anderson; Cynthia D Adams; Elliott M Antman; Charles R Bridges; Robert M Califf; Donald E Casey; William E Chavey; Francis M Fesmire; Judith S Hochman; Thomas N Levin; A Michael Lincoff; Eric D Peterson; Pierre Theroux; Nanette Kass Wenger; R Scott Wright; Sidney C Smith; Alice K Jacobs; Cynthia D Adams; Jeffrey L Anderson; Elliott M Antman; Jonathan L Halperin; Sharon A Hunt; Harlan M Krumholz; Frederick G Kushner; Bruce W Lytle; Rick Nishimura; Joseph P Ornato; Richard L Page; Barbara Riegel Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-08-14 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Eric D Peterson; Matthew T Roe; John S Rumsfeld; Richard E Shaw; Ralph G Brindis; Gregg C Fonarow; Christopher P Cannon Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2009-09
Authors: Tori Sutherland; Jennifer Beloff; Marie Lightowler; Xiaoxia Liu; Luigino Nascimben; Alan D Kaye; Richard D Urman Journal: Patient Saf Surg Date: 2014-09-17