BACKGROUND: There is a recognized need for a national unified registry to track presenting features, care, and outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction. To address this need, the American Heart Association's Get With the Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease program joined the Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network (ACTION) Registry to create the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ACTION-Get With the Guidelines (AR-G) in June of 2008. This article outlines the objectives, operational structure, patient population, data elements, data collection methodology, and reporting components of this landmark registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: The AR-G was launched in January of 2007. The registry is led by a team of volunteers from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology, and its data coordinating center resides at the Duke Clinical Research Institute. As of December 2008, 344 US hospitals already contributed detailed clinical information on 103 890 myocardial infarction patients (inclusive of 39% ST-segment myocardial infarction and 61% non-ST-segment myocardial infarction patients). Overall data quality has been excellent, with <5% clinical fields missing. Site quality improvement efforts are supported via detailed quarterly feedback reports, routine web educational programs, and sharing of "best practice" clinical support tools. CONCLUSIONS: The AR-G represents a unified, national, acute myocardial infarction registry and supports a robust quality improvement effort designed to encourage evidence-based acute myocardial infarction care and, ultimately, improve patient outcomes.
BACKGROUND: There is a recognized need for a national unified registry to track presenting features, care, and outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction. To address this need, the American Heart Association's Get With the Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease program joined the Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network (ACTION) Registry to create the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ACTION-Get With the Guidelines (AR-G) in June of 2008. This article outlines the objectives, operational structure, patient population, data elements, data collection methodology, and reporting components of this landmark registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: The AR-G was launched in January of 2007. The registry is led by a team of volunteers from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology, and its data coordinating center resides at the Duke Clinical Research Institute. As of December 2008, 344 US hospitals already contributed detailed clinical information on 103 890 myocardial infarctionpatients (inclusive of 39% ST-segment myocardial infarction and 61% non-ST-segment myocardial infarctionpatients). Overall data quality has been excellent, with <5% clinical fields missing. Site quality improvement efforts are supported via detailed quarterly feedback reports, routine web educational programs, and sharing of "best practice" clinical support tools. CONCLUSIONS: The AR-G represents a unified, national, acute myocardial infarction registry and supports a robust quality improvement effort designed to encourage evidence-based acute myocardial infarction care and, ultimately, improve patient outcomes.
Authors: Prashant Kaul; Jerome J Federspiel; Xuming Dai; Sally C Stearns; Sidney C Smith; Michael Yeung; Hadi Beyhaghi; Lei Zhou; George A Stouffer Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-11-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Faraz Kureshi; Ali Shafiq; Suzanne V Arnold; Kensey Gosch; Tracie Breeding; Ashwath S Kumar; Philip G Jones; John A Spertus Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2016-11-07 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Yun Wang; Noel Eldridge; Mark L Metersky; Nancy R Verzier; Thomas P Meehan; Michelle M Pandolfi; JoAnne M Foody; Shih-Yieh Ho; Deron Galusha; Rebecca E Kliman; Nancy Sonnenfeld; Harlan M Krumholz; James Battles Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-01-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alexis L Beatty; Shuang Li; Laine Thomas; Ezra A Amsterdam; Karen P Alexander; Mary A Whooley Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-04-23 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Ambarish Pandey; Harsh Golwala; Hurst M Hall; Tracy Y Wang; Di Lu; Ying Xian; Karen Chiswell; Karen E Joynt; Abhinav Goyal; Sandeep R Das; Dharam Kumbhani; Howard Julien; Gregg C Fonarow; James A de Lemos Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Jonathan R Enriquez; James A de Lemos; Shailja V Parikh; DaJuanicia N Simon; Laine E Thomas; Tracy Y Wang; Paul S Chan; John A Spertus; Sandeep R Das Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2015-10-20
Authors: James G Jollis; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Mayme L Roettig; Peter B Berger; Claire C Corbett; Harold L Dauerman; Christopher B Fordyce; Kathleen Fox; J Lee Garvey; Tammy Gregory; Timothy D Henry; Ivan C Rokos; Matthew W Sherwood; Robert E Suter; B Hadley Wilson; Christopher B Granger Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Deborah B Diercks; Michael C Kontos; Judd E Hollander; Bryn E Mumma; DaJuanicia N Holmes; Stephen Wiviott; Jorge F Saucedo; James A de Lemos Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2013-05-20 Impact factor: 2.469