Literature DB >> 21245078

Added predictive value of high-throughput molecular data to clinical data and its validation.

Anne-Laure Boulesteix1, Willi Sauerbrei.   

Abstract

Hundreds of 'molecular signatures' have been proposed in the literature to predict patient outcome in clinical settings from high-dimensional data, many of which eventually failed to get validated. Validation of such molecular research findings is thus becoming an increasingly important branch of clinical bioinformatics. Moreover, in practice well-known clinical predictors are often already available. From a statistical and bioinformatics point of view, poor attention has been given to the evaluation of the added predictive value of a molecular signature given that clinical predictors or an established index are available. This article reviews procedures that assess and validate the added predictive value of high-dimensional molecular data. It critically surveys various approaches for the construction of combined prediction models using both clinical and molecular data, for validating added predictive value based on independent data, and for assessing added predictive value using a single data set.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21245078     DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbq085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   11.622


  16 in total

1.  Cross-validation and hypothesis testing in neuroimaging: An irenic comment on the exchange between Friston and Lindquist et al.

Authors:  Philip T Reiss
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Statistical learning approaches in the genetic epidemiology of complex diseases.

Authors:  Anne-Laure Boulesteix; Marvin N Wright; Sabine Hoffmann; Inke R König
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Integrated genomic analysis for prediction of survival for patients with liver cancer using The Cancer Genome Atlas.

Authors:  Yan-Zhou Song; Xu Li; Wei Li; Zhong Wang; Kai Li; Fang-Liang Xie; Feng Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  An argument for mechanism-based statistical inference in cancer.

Authors:  Donald Geman; Michael Ochs; Nathan D Price; Cristian Tomasetti; Laurent Younes
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Computational mass spectrometry-based proteomics.

Authors:  Lukas Käll; Olga Vitek
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Stepwise classification of cancer samples using clinical and molecular data.

Authors:  Askar Obulkasim; Gerrit A Meijer; Mark A van de Wiel
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Comparison of classification methods that combine clinical data and high-dimensional mass spectrometry data.

Authors:  Caroline Truntzer; Elise Mostacci; Aline Jeannin; Jean-Michel Petit; Patrick Ducoroy; Hervé Cardot
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Added predictive value of omics data: specific issues related to validation illustrated by two case studies.

Authors:  Riccardo De Bin; Tobias Herold; Anne-Laure Boulesteix
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 9.  Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: prognostic model research.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Karel G M Moons; Danielle A van der Windt; Jill A Hayden; Pablo Perel; Sara Schroter; Richard D Riley; Harry Hemingway; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Comparison and evaluation of pathway-level aggregation methods of gene expression data.

Authors:  Seungwoo Hwang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.