Literature DB >> 21245071

Quality of life and functional results of submucosal injection therapy using dextranomer hyaluronic acid for fecal incontinence.

Oliver Schwandner1, Marion Brunner, Otto Dietl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The aim of this prospective study was to analyze safety and functional outcome of transanal submucosal injection of dextranomer hyaluronic acid ("bulking agents therapy") in patients with passive fecal incontinence.
METHODS: All patients who underwent transanal injection therapy were prospectively enrolled in this study. Inclusion criteria included fecal incontinence (internal anal sphincter dysfunction) after failed conservative treatment. The procedure was performed in a standardized technique, including submucosal injection of 4 × 1 mL dextranomer hyaluronic acid 5 mm above the dentate line. The primary endpoint focused on symptom improvement provided as the change in incontinence status and quality of life using validated scores (Wexner incontinence score, symptom-specific Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life [FIQoL] scale, and generic EQ-5D-Visual Analogue Scale [EQ-5D-VAS]).
RESULTS: Within the observation period (July 2007 to May 2009), a total of 21 patients (17 women) with passive fecal incontinence were treated. Neither morbidity nor adverse events were documented. Three months postoperatively, 61.1% (11/18) showed significant improvement of symptoms (reduction of incontinence episodes and soiling), which was sustained after 20 months in 55.6% (10/18). Wexner incontinence score decreased from 16.8 to 12.3 (P > .05). Significant improvement was documented for FIQoL and EQ-5D-VAS (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: The current results indicate that injection therapy using hyaluronic acid is an innovative and minimally invasive procedure with no morbidity. Although Wexner incontinence score is not significantly influenced, a significant improvement in quality of life was observed in more than 50% of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21245071     DOI: 10.1177/1553350610392243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Innov        ISSN: 1553-3506            Impact factor:   2.058


  7 in total

Review 1.  Current management of fecal incontinence: choosing amongst treatment options to optimize outcomes.

Authors:  Julie Ann M Van Koughnett; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Current status: new technologies for the treatment of patients with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Andreas M Kaiser; Guy R Orangio; Massarat Zutshi; Suraj Alva; Tracy L Hull; Peter W Marcello; David A Margolin; Janice F Rafferty; W Donald Buie; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Midterm outcomes of injectable bulking agents for fecal incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  K D Hong; J S Kim; W B Ji; J W Um
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  An evaluation of the long-term effectiveness of Gatekeeper™ intersphincteric implants for passive faecal incontinence.

Authors:  S A A Jabbar; J Camilleri-Brennan
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.699

5.  Long-term efficacy of NASHA Dx injection therapy for treatment of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  A Mellgren; K E Matzel; J Pollack; T Hull; M Bernstein; W Graf
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 6.  Current and emerging treatment options for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Satish S C Rao
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.062

7.  Identifying factors associated with clinical success in patients treated with NASHA(®)/Dx injection for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Howard Franklin; Andrew C Barrett; Ray Wolf
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.