Literature DB >> 21244179

Within- and between-culture variation: individual differences and the cultural logics of honor, face, and dignity cultures.

Angela K-Y Leung1, Dov Cohen.   

Abstract

The CuPS (Culture × Person × Situation) approach attempts to jointly consider culture and individual differences, without treating either as noise and without reducing one to the other. Culture is important because it helps define psychological situations and create meaningful clusters of behavior according to particular logics. Individual differences are important because individuals vary in the extent to which they endorse or reject a culture's ideals. Further, because different cultures are organized by different logics, individual differences mean something different in each. Central to these studies are concepts of honor-related violence and individual worth as being inalienable versus socially conferred. We illustrate our argument with 2 experiments involving participants from honor, face, and dignity cultures. The studies showed that the same "type" of person who was most helpful, honest, and likely to behave with integrity in one culture was the "type" of person least likely to do so in another culture. We discuss how CuPS can provide a rudimentary but integrated approach to understanding both within- and between-culture variation. (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21244179     DOI: 10.1037/a0022151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  26 in total

1.  Perceived Social Support and Mental Health Problems Among Pakistani University Students.

Authors:  Tahira Jibeen
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2015-10-09

2.  Science as a Matter of Honour: How Accused Scientists Deal with Scientific Fraud in Japan.

Authors:  Pablo A Pellegrini
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Subjective and Objective Hierarchies and Their Relations to Psychological Well-Being: A U.S/Japan Comparison.

Authors:  Katherine B Curhan; Cynthia S Levine; Hazel Rose Markus; Shinobu Kitayama; Jiyoung Park; Mayumi Karasawa; Norito Kawakami; Gayle D Love; Christopher L Coe; Yuri Miyamoto; Carol D Ryff
Journal:  Soc Psychol Personal Sci       Date:  2014-11

4.  Honor, face, and dignity norm endorsement among diverse North American adolescents: Development of a Social Norms Survey.

Authors:  Karin S Frey; Adaurennaya C Onyewuenyi; Shelley Hymel; Randip Gill; Cynthia R Pearson
Journal:  Int J Behav Dev       Date:  2020-09-10

5.  Interaction between games give rise to the evolution of moral norms of cooperation.

Authors:  Mohammad Salahshour
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.779

6.  From virility to virtue: the psychology of apology in honor cultures.

Authors:  Ying Lin; Nava Caluori; Engin Bağış Öztürk; Michele J Gelfand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  Accounting for Plural Cognitive Framings of Growth and Sustainability: Rethinking Management Education in Latin America.

Authors:  Maria Jose Murcia; Pilar Acosta
Journal:  J Bus Ethics       Date:  2022-06-26

8.  The surprising underperformance of East Asians in US law and business schools: The liability of low assertiveness and the ameliorative potential of online classrooms.

Authors:  Jackson G Lu; Richard E Nisbett; Michael W Morris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 12.779

9.  Trolls Without Borders: A Cross-Cultural Examination of Victim Reactions to Verbal and Silent Aggression Online.

Authors:  Christine Linda Cook; Juliette Schaafsma; Marjolijn L Antheunis; Suleman Shahid; Jih-Hsuan Tammy Lin; Hanne W Nijtmans
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-01

10.  Cultural regulation of emotion: individual, relational, and structural sources.

Authors:  Jozefien De Leersnyder; Michael Boiger; Batja Mesquita
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.