Literature DB >> 28653168

Science as a Matter of Honour: How Accused Scientists Deal with Scientific Fraud in Japan.

Pablo A Pellegrini1.   

Abstract

Practices related to research misconduct seem to have been multiplied in recent years. Many cases of scientific fraud have been exposed publicly, and journals and academic institutions have deployed different measures worldwide in this regard. However, the influence of specific social and cultural environments on scientific fraud may vary from society to society. This article analyzes how scientists in Japan deal with accusations of scientific fraud. For such a purpose, a series of scientific fraud cases that took place in Japan has been reconstructed through diverse sources. Thus, by analyzing those cases, the social basis of scientific fraud and the most relevant aspects of Japanese cultural values and traditions, as well as the concept of honour which is deeply involved in the way Japanese scientists react when they are accused of and publicly exposed in scientific fraud situations is examined.

Keywords:  Honour; Japan; Research misconduct; Scientific fraud

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28653168     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9937-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  18 in total

1.  Economic factors and suicide rates: associations over time in four countries.

Authors:  Alfonso Ceccherini-Nelli; Stefan Priebe
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?

Authors:  R Grant Steen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  STAP cells are derived from ES cells.

Authors:  Daijiro Konno; Takeya Kasukawa; Kosuke Hashimoto; Takehiko Itoh; Taeko Suetsugu; Ikuo Miura; Shigeharu Wakana; Piero Carninci; Fumio Matsuzaki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The perverse effects of competition on scientists' work and relationships.

Authors:  Melissa S Anderson; Emily A Ronning; Raymond De Vries; Brian C Martinson
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Questionable, Objectionable or Criminal? Public Opinion on Data Fraud and Selective Reporting in Science.

Authors:  Justin T Pickett; Sean Patrick Roche
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Suicide of Japanese Youth.

Authors:  M Iga
Journal:  Suicide Life Threat Behav       Date:  1981

7.  Defending honour, keeping face: Interpersonal affordances of anger and shame in Turkey and Japan.

Authors:  Michael Boiger; Derya Güngör; Mayumi Karasawa; Batja Mesquita
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2014-01-31

8.  The effect of job loss and unemployment duration on suicide risk in the United States: a new look using mass-layoffs and unemployment duration.

Authors:  Timothy J Classen; Richard A Dunn
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Perceptions of Chinese Biomedical Researchers Towards Academic Misconduct: A Comparison Between 2015 and 2010.

Authors:  Qing-Jiao Liao; Yuan-Yuan Zhang; Yu-Chen Fan; Ming-Hua Zheng; Yu Bai; Guy D Eslick; Xing-Xiang He; Shi-Bing Zhang; Harry Hua-Xiang Xia; Hua He
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  2 in total

1.  How Accused Scientists Deal with Scientific Fraud: View from a Different Culture.

Authors:  Beuy Joob; Viroj Wiwanitkit
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Street research market: dealing with scientific misconduct in Iran.

Authors:  Homayoun Sadeghi-Bazargani; Leila Nikniaz; Hamid Reza Yousefi Nodeh
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.652

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.