| Literature DB >> 21241476 |
Yasuhiro Mitsui1, Masafumi Gotoh, Nobuhiro Fukushima, Isao Shirachi, Shuichi Otabe, Xiaohong Yuan, Toshihiko Hashinaga, Nobuhiko Wada, Akiko Mitsui, Tatsuhiro Yoshida, Shiro Yoshida, Kentaro Yamada, Kensei Nagata.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that adiponectin, a physiologically active polypeptide secreted by adipocytes, controls not only adipose tissue but also bone metabolism. However, a role for adiponectin in bone development remains controversial.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21241476 PMCID: PMC3029226 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Figure 1Serum levels of human (A) and mouse (B) full-length adiponectin in 12-week-old Ad-Tg and WT littermate mice. Data are expressed as means (bars) ± S.D. (error bar), n = 8. ND, not detected. Significant difference from WT serum level, P < 0.05.
Serum levels of osteocalcin, TRAP5b, RANKL and OPG in 12-week-old Ad-Tg and WT littermate mice.
| WT | Ad-Tg Line11 | Ad-Tg Line13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Osteocaltin (ng/ml) | 25.2 ± 1.1 | 27.8 ± 0.8** | 27.7 ± 0.9** |
| TRAP5b (U/L) | 2.2 ± 0.4 | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 2.3 ± 0.4 |
| RANKL (pg/ml) | 68.6 ± 7.2 | 82.0 ± 24.6 | 77.1 ± 29.1 |
| OPG (ng/ml) | 2226.9 ± 61.4 | 2251.5 ± 212.0 | 2521.9 ± 277.8 |
Data are expressed as means ± S.D. (n = 8). **Significant difference from WT serum level, P < 0.05.
Figure 2BMD (A) and BMC (B) of the entire femur were measured by DEXA. Data are expressed as means (bars) ± S.D. (error bar), n = 8. Significant difference from WT mice, P < 0.05.
Parameters for trabecular bone were measured below the growth plate at the proximal metaphysis of the tibia in Toluidine-Blue and calcein double-labeled sections.
| WT | Ad-Tg Line 11 | Ad-Tg Line 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BV/TV (%) | 12.6 ± 2.7 | 16.1 ± 2.5* | 17.3 ± 1.7** |
| Tb.N (/mm) | 3.3 ± 0.3 | 3.9 ± 0.4* | 3.9 ± 0.5* |
| OS/BS (%) | 7.1 ± 4.1 | 17.7 ± 4.9** | 15.4 ± 3.5* |
| O.Th (μm) | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 3.3 ± 0.1** | 2.8 ± 0.2 |
| Ob.S/BS (%) | 3.3 ± 2.8 | 7.4 ± 2.2* | 9.3 ± 5.4** |
| N.Oc/B.Pm (/100 mm) | 123.7 ± 41.1 | 112.2 ± 41.8 | 132.1 ± 60.7 |
| Oc.S/BS (%) | 1.0 ± 0.5 | 1.1 ± 0.7 | 1.4 ± 0.5 |
| ES/BS (%) | 2.7 ± 1.4 | 3.3 ± 1.5 | 4.4 ± 1.1 |
| MAR (μm/day) | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 1.7 ± 0.1** | 1.6 ± 0.1* |
| MS/BS (%) | 19.1 ± 3.2 | 33.1 ± 2.9** | 26.8 ± 5.2* |
| BFR/BS (mm3/mm2/year) | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.03** | 0.14 ± 0.03** |
| dLS/BS (%) | 7.0 ± 1.0 | 20.7 ± 2.0** | 14.6 ± 4.2** |
BV/TV, bone volume/total tissue volume; Tb. N, trabecular number; OS/BS, osteoid surface/bone surface; O.Th, osteoid thickness; Ob.S/BS, osteoblast surface/bone surface; N.Oc/B.Pm, osteoclast number/bone perimeter; Oc.S/BS, osteoclast surface/bone surface; ES/BS, eroded surface/bone surface; MAR, mineral apposition rate; MS/BS (mineralization ratio), mineralizing surface/bone surface; BFR/BS, bone formation rate/bone surface; dLS/BS, double labeled surface/bone surface. Data are expressed as means ± S.D. of 8 bones/group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, significantly different from WT mice.