Literature DB >> 21240745

Contributions of familiarity and recollection rejection to recognition: evidence from the time course of false recognition for semantic and conjunction lures.

Laura E Matzen1, Eric G Taylor, Aaron S Benjamin.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that both familiarity and recollection contribute to the recognition decision process. In this paper we leverage the form of false alarm rate functions--in which false alarm rates describe an inverted U-shaped function as the time between study and test increases--to assess how these processes support retention of semantic and surface form information from previously studied words. We directly compare the maxima of these functions for lures that are semantically related and lures that are related by surface form to previously studied material. This analysis reveals a more rapid loss of access to surface form than to semantic information. To separate the contributions of item familiarity and reminding-induced recollection rejection to this effect, we use a simple multinomial process model; this analysis reveals that this loss of access reflects both a more rapid loss of familiarity and lower rates of recollection for surface form information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21240745      PMCID: PMC3059110          DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2010.530271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  25 in total

1.  Item recognition memory and the receiver operating characteristic.

Authors:  Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Recollection rejection: false-memory editing in children and adults.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; V F Reyna; Ron Wright; A H Mojardin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Robust recollection rejection in the memory conjunction paradigm.

Authors:  James M Lampinen; Timothy N Odegard; Jeffrey S Neuschatz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Study repetition and the rejection of conjunction lures.

Authors:  Todd C Jones
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2005-07

5.  Metamemorial influences in recognition memory: pictorial encoding reduces conjunction errors.

Authors:  Marianne E Lloyd
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

6.  Encoding processes and the spacing effect.

Authors:  F S Bellezza; H B Winkler; F Andrasik
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1975-07

7.  Memory for ideas: Synonym substitution.

Authors:  W F Brewer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1975-07

8.  On the dual effects of repetition on false recognition.

Authors:  A S Benjamin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Recollection rejection: gist cuing of verbatim memory.

Authors:  Timothy N Odegard; James M Lampinen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-12

10.  Remembering words not presented in sentences: how study context changes patterns of false memories.

Authors:  Laura E Matzen; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-01
View more
  9 in total

1.  Older and wiser: older adults' episodic word memory benefits from sentence study contexts.

Authors:  Laura E Matzen; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2013-07-08

2.  What happened (and what didn't): Discourse constraints on encoding of plausible alternatives.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; Aaron S Benjamin; Duane G Watson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Tests of the DRYAD theory of the age-related deficit in memory for context: not about context, and not about aging.

Authors:  Aaron S Benjamin; Michael Diaz; Laura E Matzen; Benjamin Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-08-29

4.  Saccade-induced retrieval enhancement and the recovery of perceptual item-specific information.

Authors:  Andrew Parker; Jolyon Poole; Neil Dagnall
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-12-16

5.  Sensory Representations Supporting Memory Specificity: Age Effects on Behavioral and Neural Discriminability.

Authors:  Caitlin R Bowman; Jordan D Chamberlain; Nancy A Dennis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Representational explanations of "process" dissociations in recognition: the DRYAD theory of aging and memory judgments.

Authors:  Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Exploring the use of phonological and semantic representations in working memory.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Dominic Guitard; Nathaniel R Greene; Sylvain Fiset
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.140

8.  Recollection is fast and slow.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; K Nakamura; W-F A Lee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Similar time course of fast familiarity and slow recollection processes for recognition memory in humans and macaques.

Authors:  Zhemeng Wu; Martina Kavanova; Lydia Hickman; Fiona Lin; Mark J Buckley
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.460

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.