Literature DB >> 21240639

Value of FDG PET/CT in patients with treated ovarian cancer and raised CA125 serum levels.

Azahara Palomar1, Cristina Nanni, Paolo Castellucci, Valentina Ambrosini, Gian Carlo Montini, Vincenzo Allegri, Cinzia Pettinato, Adil Al-Nahhas, Angel Soriano, Gaia Grassetto, Domenico Rubello, Stefano Fanti.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients treated for ovarian cancer are usually referred for 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) in case of increased Carcinoma Antigen 125 (CA125) but negative conventional imaging. However, there is not enough in the literature to support the value of FDG PET/CT in this context. This study aimed to assess role of FDG PET/CT in a cohort of patients with treated ovarian cancer and correlate the results with serum levels of CA125. PROCEDURES: We retrospectively studied 175 patients, mean age 65.2 years (range 24-88 years) who had radical treatment for ovarian cancer (chemotherapy, surgery or combination). The patients had a standard FDG PET/CT and measurement of serum CA125 within a month of the scan. PET/CT was considered positive if demonstrated areas of abnormally increased metabolic activity unrelated to physiological distribution, on the basis of a visual analysis. The results of PET/CT imaging were compared to the level of CA125, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted and area-under-the curve (AUC) statistics were computed. Cytologic or histologic data or clinical and imaging follow-up were taken as gold standard.
RESULTS: Patients were divided into five groups based on CA125 values. The average level of CA125 was 107.7 (range 3-867, SD 166.1). PET/CT was positive in 125/175 cases (71.4%), mean value of CA125 132.2 (SD 182.9) and negative in 50/175 (28.6%), mean value of CA125 46.4 (SD 89.3). In descriptive ROC analyses, the discriminatory power of this marker was relatively high (AUC statistics 0.77, range = 0.703-0.8). The optimal cut-off point of CA125 after treatment to reflect active disease on PET/CT was 18 U/mL achieving a detection rate of 85.6%. There was no relation between PET/CT negativity and the histological type of the tumor.
CONCLUSION: PET/CT was able to detect active disease at relatively low levels of CA125, thereby facilitating the early diagnosis of recurrence or residual disease. Also in patients with low CA125 levels (<30), PET/CT had a relatively high detection rate (53%). According to our preliminary results, the use of FDG PET/CT in this setting is justified even with low serum CA125 levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21240639     DOI: 10.1007/s11307-010-0468-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  18 in total

1.  CA125 expression pattern, prognosis and correlation with serum CA125 in ovarian tumor patients. From The Danish "MALOVA" Ovarian Cancer Study.

Authors:  Estrid V S Høgdall; Lise Christensen; Susanne K Kjaer; Jan Blaakaer; Anette Kjaerbye-Thygesen; Simon Gayther; Ian J Jacobs; Claus K Høgdall
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  Cancer of the ovary.

Authors:  Stephen A Cannistra
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Preoperative serum CA-125 levels and risk of suboptimal cytoreduction in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sokbom Kang; Tae-Joong Kim; Byung-Ho Nam; Sang-Soo Seo; Byoung-Gie Kim; Duk-Soo Bae; Sang-Yoon Park
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 4.  Ovarian cancer: epidemiology, biology, and prognostic factors.

Authors:  C H Holschneider; J S Berek
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug

5.  Doubling time of serum CA125 is an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with ovarian cancer relapsing after first-line chemotherapy.

Authors:  Liz Y Han; Vasilios Karavasilis; Tom van Hagen; Shibani Nicum; Karen Thomas; Michelle Harrison; Panagiotis Papadopoulos; Peter Blake; Desmond P J Barton; Martin Gore; Stan B Kaye
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Ovarian cancer recurrence: role of whole-body positron emission tomography using 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy- D-glucose.

Authors:  Tatsuo Torizuka; Shuji Nobezawa; Toshihiko Kanno; Masami Futatsubashi; Etsuji Yoshikawa; Hiroyuki Okada; Munetaka Takekuma; Makoto Maeda; Yasuomi Ouchi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Use of CA-125 to define progression of ovarian cancer in patients with persistently elevated levels.

Authors:  G J Rustin; M Marples; A E Nelstrop; M Mahmoudi; T Meyer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  A radioimmunoassay using a monoclonal antibody to monitor the course of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  R C Bast; T L Klug; E St John; E Jenison; J M Niloff; H Lazarus; R S Berkowitz; T Leavitt; C T Griffiths; L Parker; V R Zurawski; R C Knapp
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-10-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  The CA 125 tumour-associated antigen: a review of the literature.

Authors:  I Jacobs; R C Bast
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Update in the management of ovarian and cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  A Poveda; R Salazar; J M del Campo; C Mendiola; J Cassinello; B Ojeda; J A Arranz; A Oaknin; J García-Foncillas; M J Rubio; A González Martín
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.340

View more
  9 in total

1.  Benefits of fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in secondary cytoreductive surgery for patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  P Peng; Z H Zhu; Z J Zhong; K Zheng; J X Yang; D Y Cao; K Shen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Impact of FDG PET in optimizing patient selection for cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Ebina; Hidemichi Watari; Masanori Kaneuchi; Mahito Takeda; Masayoshi Hosaka; Masataka Kudo; Hideto Yamada; Noriaki Sakuragi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  New ways of assessing ovarian cancer response: metabolic imaging and beyond.

Authors:  Andrea Rockall; Alice Munari; Norbert Avril
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.909

4.  DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction analysis in peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer: correlation with clinical pathological factors and response to chemotherapy.

Authors:  Silvia Carloni; Giulia Gallerani; Anna Tesei; Emanuela Scarpi; Giorgio Maria Verdecchia; Salvatore Virzì; Francesco Fabbri; Chiara Arienti
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Systematic Review on the Accuracy of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Ovarian Cancer: Is Functional Information Really Needed?

Authors:  Subapriya Suppiah; Wing Liong Chang; Hasyma Abu Hassan; Chalermrat Kaewput; Andi Anggeriana Andi Asri; Fathinul Fikri Ahmad Saad; Abdul Jalil Nordin; Sobhan Vinjamuri
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

6.  Value of [18F]FDG-PET/CT and CA125, serum levels and kinetic parameters, in early detection of ovarian cancer recurrence: Influence of histological subtypes and tumor stages.

Authors:  Azahara Palomar Muñoz; José Manuel Cordero García; Mª Del Prado Talavera Rubio; Ana Mª García Vicente; Francisco José Pena Pardo; Germán Andrés Jiménez Londoño; Ángel Soriano Castrejón; Enrique Aranda Aguilar
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 7.  A Review of Nuclear Medicine Approaches in the Diagnosis and the Treatment of Gynecological Malignancies.

Authors:  Nasim Vahidfar; Saeed Farzanefar; Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar; Eóin N Molloy; Elisabeth Eppard
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Clinical and Survival Impact of FDG PET in Patients with Suspicion of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A 6-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Daniela Rusu; Thomas Carlier; Mathilde Colombié; Dorothée Goulon; Vincent Fleury; Nicolas Rousseau; Dominique Berton-Rigaud; Isabelle Jaffre; Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré; Loic Campion; Caroline Rousseau
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2015-07-22

9.  Posttreatment FDG PET/CT in predicting survival of patients with ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Linda C Chu; Hua-Ling Tsai; Hao Wang; John Crandall; Mehrbod S Javadi; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.138

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.