Literature DB >> 21240045

Subsequent vertebral fracture after vertebroplasty: incidence and analysis of risk factors.

Yi-An Li1, Che-Li Lin, Ming-Chau Chang, Chien-Lin Liu, Tain-Hsiung Chen, Shih-Chang Lai.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective review and analysis of consecutive patients who underwent single-level vertebroplasty at our institute between March 2002 and March 2006.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the risk factors for subsequent fractures after vertebroplasty and to predict the postoperative fracture-free time and rate. The effect of bone cement volume injected was also evaluated. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies of subsequent fractures after vertebroplasty showed conflicting conclusions about risk factors. The frequency of refracture also varied, ranging from 12% to 52%. Most new fractures occurred at adjacent levels, with different risk factors identified. No data were available on the effect of injected bone cement volume, and no consensus had been reached as to the optimal cement volume.
METHODS: All enrolled patients were treated with single-level vertebroplasty and followed a standardized postoperative care protocol. Data from medical records and radiographs were collected and analyzed. Variables included patient constitutional factors, radiographic parameters, and volume of injected bone cement.
RESULTS: A total of 166 patients (76 men, 90 women) with a mean age of 73.4 years were enrolled in this study. The mean follow-up time was 15.3 months. The overall refracture rate was 38%, with a mean fracture-free interval of 32 months. Both a greater volume of bone cement injected and a greater degree of vertebral height restored contributed significantly to the risk of subsequent adjacent fracture. No risk factor for subsequent remote fracture was identified. A greater volume of bone cement injected was positively correlated with deformity correction after vertebroplasty.
CONCLUSION: Most subsequent fractures occurred at the adjacent level within the first 3 months. Patient preoperative condition did not help predict refracture. Although a greater volume of bone cement injected when performing vertebroplasty contributed to the risk of subsequent adjacent fracture, it resulted in a greater improvement of kyphosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21240045     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f72b05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  30 in total

1.  Risk factors of new symptomatic vertebral compression fractures in osteoporotic patients undergone percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Hai-long Ren; Jian-ming Jiang; Jian-ting Chen; Ji-xing Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Is vertebroplasty a risk factor for subsequent vertebral fracture, meta-analysis of published evidence?

Authors:  S L Han; S L Wan; Q T Li; D T Xu; H M Zang; N J Chen; L Y Chen; W P Zhang; C Luan; F Yang; Z W Xu
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Association between handgrip strength and subsequent vertebral-fracture risk following percutaneous vertebral augmentation.

Authors:  Shu-Bao Zhang; Hao Chen; Hao-Wei Xu; Shan-Jin Wang; Yu-Yang Yi; De-Sheng Wu
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Risk factor analysis for re-collapse of cemented vertebrae after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) or percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP).

Authors:  Yong-Xian Li; Dan-Qing Guo; Shun-Cong Zhang; Kai Yuan; Guo-Ye Mo; Da-Xing Li; Hui-Zhi Guo; Yongchao Tang; Pei-Jie Luo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Biomechanical comparison of vertebral augmentation with silicone and PMMA cement and two filling grades.

Authors:  Tobias L Schulte; Alexander Keiler; Felix Riechelmann; Tobias Lange; Werner Schmoelz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Analysis of Clinical Features of Hip Fracture Patients with or without Prior Osteoporotic Spinal Compression Fractures.

Authors:  Gang Deuk Kim; Yeung Jin Kim; Soo Uk Chae; Deok Hwa Choi
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2013-05-13

7.  Subsequent fractures post-vertebral augmentation: analysis of a prospective randomized trial in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  L Gilula; M Persenaire
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Surgical procedure and initial radiographic results of a new augmentation technique for vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Martin Thaler; Ricarda Lechner; Michael Nogler; Michaela Gstöttner; Christian Bach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Late collapse osteoporotic vertebral fracture in an elderly patient with neurological compromise.

Authors:  D Ruiz Picazo; J Ramírez Villaescusa; E Portero Martínez; F Doñate Pérez
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty in Iranian patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Farzad Omidi-Kashani; Ebrahim Ghayem Hasankhani; Mohammad H Ebrahimzadeh; Amir Reza Kachooei; Mohammad Hasani; Ali Moradi
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2013-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.