Literature DB >> 21240001

Computer decision support software safely improves glycemic control in the burn intensive care unit: a randomized controlled clinical study.

Elizabeth A Mann1, John A Jones, Steven E Wolf, Charles E Wade.   

Abstract

The optimal method for glycemic control in the critically burned patient is unknown. The purpose of this randomized controlled study was to determine the safety and efficacy of computer decision support software (CDSS) to control serum glucose concentration in a burn intensive care unit. Eighteen adult burn/trauma patients receiving continuous insulin infusion were initially randomized to receive glucose management by a traditional paper protocol or a computer protocol (CP) for 72 hours and then crossed over to the alternate method for an additional 72 hours. Time in target glucose range (range: 80-110 mg/dl) was higher in the CP group (47 ± 17% vs 41 ± 16.6%; P ≤ .05); time over target range was not significantly reduced in the CP group (49 ± 17.8% vs 54 ± 17.1%; P = .08); and no difference was noted in time under target range of 80 mg/dl (CP: 4.5 ± 2.8%, paper protocol: 4.8 ± 3.3%; P = .8), less than 60 mg/dl (P = .7), and less than 40 mg/dl (P = 1.0). Severe hypoglycemic events (<40 mg/dl) did not differ from the CP group compared with historical controls for patients receiving no insulin (P = .6). More glucose measurements were performed in the CP group (P = .0003), and nursing staff compliance with CP recommendations was greater (P < .0001). Glycemic control using CDSS is safe and effective for the critically burned patient. Time in target range improved without increase in hypoglycemic events. CDSS enhanced consistency in practice, providing standardization among nursing staff.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21240001      PMCID: PMC3042492          DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31820aaebf

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  28 in total

1.  Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients.

Authors:  G van den Berghe; P Wouters; F Weekers; C Verwaest; F Bruyninckx; M Schetz; D Vlasselaers; P Ferdinande; P Lauwers; R Bouillon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Comparison between civilian burns and combat burns from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom.

Authors:  Steven E Wolf; David S Kauvar; Charles E Wade; Leopoldo C Cancio; Evan P Renz; Edward E Horvath; Christopher E White; Myung S Park; Sandra Wanek; Michael A Albrecht; Lorne H Blackbourne; David J Barillo; John B Holcomb
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU.

Authors:  Greet Van den Berghe; Alexander Wilmer; Greet Hermans; Wouter Meersseman; Pieter J Wouters; Ilse Milants; Eric Van Wijngaerden; Herman Bobbaers; Roger Bouillon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Glucommander: a computer-directed intravenous insulin system shown to be safe, simple, and effective in 120,618 h of operation.

Authors:  Paul C Davidson; R Dennis Steed; Bruce W Bode
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Evaluation of nursing work effort and perceptions about blood glucose testing in tight glycemic control.

Authors:  Daleen Aragon
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.228

6.  Impact of tight glycemic control in severely burned children.

Authors:  Tam N Pham; Aimee J Warren; Ho H Phan; Frederick Molitor; David G Greenhalgh; Tina L Palmieri
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2005-11

7.  The effects of hyperglycemia on skin graft survival in the burn patient.

Authors:  A Mowlavi; K Andrews; S Milner; D N Herndon; J P Heggers
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  Hyperglycemia exacerbates muscle protein catabolism in burn-injured patients.

Authors:  Dennis C Gore; David L Chinkes; David W Hart; Steven E Wolf; David N Herndon; Arthur P Sanford
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Acute hyperglycaemia following thermal injury: friend or foe?

Authors:  C Holm; F Hörbrand; M Mayr; G Henckel von Donnersmarck; W Mühlbauer
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.262

10.  Computerized intensive insulin dosing can mitigate hypoglycemia and achieve tight glycemic control when glucose measurement is performed frequently and on time.

Authors:  Rattan Juneja; Corbin P Roudebush; Stanley A Nasraway; Adam A Golas; Judith Jacobi; Joni Carroll; Deborah Nelson; Victor J Abad; Samuel J Flanders
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  7 in total

1.  A Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Bedside Computer Clinical Decision Support Protocol for Hyperglycemia Is Feasible, Safe and Offers Advantages.

Authors:  Eliotte L Hirshberg; Michael J Lanspa; Emily L Wilson; Katherine A Sward; Al Jephson; Gitte Y Larsen; Alan H Morris
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 2.  The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care.

Authors:  Kaveh G Shojania; Alison Jennings; Alain Mayhew; Craig R Ramsay; Martin P Eccles; Jeremy Grimshaw
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

Review 3.  Computerized decision support in adult and pediatric critical care.

Authors:  Cydni N Williams; Susan L Bratton; Eliotte L Hirshberg
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-11-04

4.  Inpatient and Outpatient Technologies to Assist in the Management of Insulin Dosing.

Authors:  Ling Cui; Pamela R Schroeder; Paul A Sack
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2020-12

5.  Effects of computerised clinical decision support systems (CDSS) on nursing and allied health professional performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review of experimental and observational studies.

Authors:  Teumzghi F Mebrahtu; Sarah Skyrme; Rebecca Randell; Anne-Maree Keenan; Karen Bloor; Huiqin Yang; Deirdre Andre; Alison Ledward; Henry King; Carl Thompson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Systematic review of clinical decision support interventions with potential for inpatient cost reduction.

Authors:  Christopher L Fillmore; Bruce E Bray; Kensaku Kawamoto
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Performance of an Electronic Decision Support System as a Therapeutic Intervention During a Multicenter PICU Clinical Trial: Heart and Lung Failure-Pediatric Insulin Titration Trial (HALF-PINT).

Authors:  Eliotte L Hirshberg; Jamin L Alexander; Lisa A Asaro; Kerry Coughlin-Wells; Garry M Steil; Debbie Spear; Cheryl Stone; Vinay M Nadkarni; Michael S D Agus
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 9.410

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.