Literature DB >> 21239466

Expectations about and impact of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying patient in an Italian hospital.

Silvia Di Leo1, Monica Beccaro, Stefania Finelli, Claudia Borreani, Massimo Costantini.   

Abstract

This study is aimed at exploring the expectations about and the impact on healthcare staff of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying patient (LCP) in an Italian hospital. Qualitative information was derived from four focus group (FG) meetings that were carried out separately by profession and scheduled before the beginning and after the end of the implementation process of the Italian version of LCP for hospitals (LCP-I). Interview topics concerned end-of-life care related problems and expectations about the impact of the LCP-I programme. Tape recordings of the FGs were transcribed verbatim, and transcripts analysed independently by two research psychologists using thematic analysis. Five major topics were identified: managing pain and discontinuing inappropriate treatments, communicating with patients, communicating with relatives, communicating between professionals and practical issues. As compared with those reported in the initial FGs, responses from the final FGs highlighted that physicians felt more confident with pain management and with discontinuing inappropriate treatment, and were more inclined to recognize the value of the nurses' work. Nurses underlined advantages in using pro re nata medication, but stressed lack of personnel and time as obstacles in consistent improvement of end-of-life care. All participants seemed to acquire greater awareness of their difficulties in communication and, paradoxically, became more uncertain of their ability to liaise with dying patients and their families. LCP-I implementation may improve both knowledge about physical symptom management and professional awareness of the problems related to emotional and informative support in end-of-life care.
© The Author(s) 2011

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21239466     DOI: 10.1177/0269216310392436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Med        ISSN: 0269-2163            Impact factor:   4.762


  12 in total

1.  Registration in a quality register: a method to improve end-of-life care--a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Lisa Martinsson; Carl Johan Fürst; Staffan Lundström; Lena Nathanaelsson; Bertil Axelsson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Understanding integrated care pathways in palliative care using realist evaluation: a mixed methods study protocol.

Authors:  Sonia Michelle Dalkin; Diana Jones; Monique Lhussier; Bill Cunningham
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Development of the care programme for the last days of life for older patients in acute geriatric hospital wards: a phase 0-1 study according to the Medical Research Council Framework.

Authors:  Rebecca Verhofstede; Tinne Smets; Joachim Cohen; Massimo Costantini; Nele Van Den Noortgate; Agnes van der Heide; Luc Deliens
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 3.234

4.  Should Patients and Family be Involved in "Do Not Resuscitate" Decisions? Views of Oncology and Palliative Care Doctors and Nurses.

Authors:  Grace M Yang; Ann K Kwee; Lalit Krishna
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2012-01

5.  Why is the Liverpool care pathway used for some dying cancer patients and not others? Healthcare professionals' perspectives.

Authors:  Alison Freemantle; Jane Seymour
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-09-24

6.  'It doesn't do the care for you': a qualitative study of health care professionals' perceptions of the benefits and harms of integrated care pathways for end of life care.

Authors:  Katherine E Sleeman; Jonathan Koffman; Katherine Bristowe; Caroline Rumble; Rachel Burman; Sara Leonard; Jo Noble; Odette Dampier; William Bernal; Myfanwy Morgan; Philip Hopkins; Wendy Prentice; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Development and evaluation of the feasibility and effects on staff, patients, and families of a new tool, the Psychosocial Assessment and Communication Evaluation (PACE), to improve communication and palliative care in intensive care and during clinical uncertainty.

Authors:  Irene J Higginson; Jonathan Koffman; Philip Hopkins; Wendy Prentice; Rachel Burman; Sara Leonard; Caroline Rumble; Jo Noble; Odette Dampier; William Bernal; Sue Hall; Myfanwy Morgan; Cathy Shipman
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Implementing the care programme for the last days of life in an acute geriatric hospital ward: a phase 2 mixed method study.

Authors:  Rebecca Verhofstede; Tinne Smets; Joachim Cohen; Massimo Costantini; Nele Van Den Noortgate; Luc Deliens
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 3.234

9.  The characteristics of patients who discontinue their dying process - an observational study at a single university hospital centre.

Authors:  Christian Schulz; Daniel Schlieper; Christiane Altreuther; Manuela Schallenburger; Katharina Fetz; Andrea Schmitz
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  Embedding a Palliative Approach in Nursing Care Delivery: An Integrated Knowledge Synthesis.

Authors:  Richard Sawatzky; Pat Porterfield; Della Roberts; Joyce Lee; Leah Liang; Sheryl Reimer-Kirkham; Barb Pesut; Tilly Schalkwyk; Kelli Stajduhar; Carolyn Tayler; Jennifer Baumbusch; Sally Thorne
Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci       Date:  2017 Jul/Sep       Impact factor: 1.824

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.