Literature DB >> 21239394

A comparative in vitro study of frictional resistance between lingual brackets and stainless steel archwires.

Yildiz Ozturk Ortan1, Tugce Yurdakuloglu Arslan, Bulent Aydemir.   

Abstract

Friction between archwires and labial brackets has received considerable attention; however, information on the frictional behaviour of commercially available lingual brackets is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the frictional resistance resulting from a combination of lingual orthodontic brackets (7th Generation, STb, Magic, and In-Ovation L) and stainless steel archwires at 0, 5, and 10 degrees of second-order angulation. Each bracket type (n = 30) was tested with three different sizes of archwires. Static and kinetic frictional forces were evaluated with a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis of the data was performed with non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's multiple comparison tests. All tested brackets showed higher frictional forces as the wire size and second-order angulation increased. The lowest friction was found with In-Ovation L brackets and 0.016 inch archwires at 0 degrees angulation, and the greatest friction with a combination of STb brackets and 0.017 × 0.025 inch archwires at 10 degrees angulation. For all combinations, Magic and In-Ovation L brackets showed lower frictional resistance when compared with 7th Generation and STb brackets. The slot width (occluso-gingival dimension) of the brackets, measured using the optics of a microhardness machine, showed that all brackets were oversized and that Magic brackets had the largest slot width. Surface roughness of the brackets investigated using atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy, demonstrated that the 7th Generation brackets had the greatest surface roughness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21239394     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  7 in total

1.  Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Graziane Olímpio Pereira; Carla Maria Melleiro Gimenez; Lucas Prieto; Marcos Gabriel do Lago Prieto; Roberta Tarkany Basting
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

2.  In vitro assessment of competency for different lingual brackets in sliding mechanics.

Authors:  S Lalithapriya; N Kurunji Kumaran; K Rajasigamani
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

3.  Frictional property comparisons of conventional and self-ligating lingual brackets according to tooth displacement during initial leveling and alignment: an in vitro mechanical study.

Authors:  Do-Yoon Kim; Bum-Soon Lim; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  Stiffness comparison of mushroom and straight SS and TMA lingual archwires.

Authors:  Luca Lombardo; Antonella Carlucci; Mario Palone; Francesco Mollica; Giuseppe Siciliani
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 2.750

5.  In-vitro investigation of the mechanical friction properties of a computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing lingual bracket system under diverse tooth displacement condition.

Authors:  Do-Yoon Kim; Sang-Woon Ha; Il-Sik Cho; Il-Hyung Yang; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 1.372

6.  Frictional resistance exerted by different lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Luca Lombardo; Weronika Wierusz; Dominique Toscano; Roberto Lapenta; Andrea Kaplan; Giuseppe Siciliani
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 2.750

Review 7.  Resistance to sliding in orthodontics: misconception or method error? A systematic review and a proposal of a test protocol.

Authors:  Fabio Savoldi; Aggeliki Papoutsi; Simona Dianiskova; Domenico Dalessandri; Stefano Bonetti; James K H Tsoi; Jukka P Matinlinna; Corrado Paganelli
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 1.372

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.